Delhi High Court
47,108 judgments
Shyam Sunder Sethi v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking allotment of a plot based on a cancelled registration, holding that delay and laches bar stale claims and ordering refund of the deposited amount with interest.
M/S Fresh Pet Private Limited v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi – 1
The Delhi High Court held that under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, reliefs granted in the original assessment such as carry forward of losses cannot be denied in settlement proceedings and apparent mistakes in Form 3 are rectifiable to prevent placing the declarant in a worse position.
Mamchand v. Shri Vijay Kumar Khanna and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking recall of its order and initiation of contempt proceedings, holding that contempt cannot be invoked without a prior court order being disobeyed and directing the petitioner to seek appropriate civil remedies.
Vijay Gaur v. Mr. Taaha Fahim & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Trial Court to expeditiously decide the pending Order VII Rule 11 application seeking rejection of plaint within six months, emphasizing timely disposal and cooperation of parties.
Din Dayal Agrawal v. Siri In Fin Lease Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court recalled arrest warrants issued in execution proceedings for non-compliance with mandatory procedure, allowing the executing court to reissue warrants after due process.
Manohar Sr v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to treat the writ petition as a representation and communicate reasons for the petitioner's downgraded seniority within eight weeks, ensuring transparency in administrative decisions.
Emerald Industries v. Tata Aldesa JV
The Delhi High Court granted a nine-month extension to the Arbitral Tribunal's mandate under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, with no objection from the respondent.
MINOR N THR MOTHER P v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR
The Delhi High Court allowed a minor rape victim's petition for medical termination of pregnancy beyond 24 weeks gestation, emphasizing reproductive autonomy, comprehensive medical assessment, and informed consent under the amended MTP Act and constitutional rights.
Tek Travels Private Limited v. Gursahib Singh Sethi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that no extension beyond 120 days is permissible for filing written statements under its Rules, but the Supreme Court's pandemic orders excluding limitation period apply to filings during that time, validating defendant no. 2's written statement while dismissing condonation for defendants 1 and 3.
Manisha v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the dismissal of a complaint for bigamy under Section 494 IPC due to lack of prima facie evidence of a second marriage.
Sarpreet Singh Johal v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr
Delhi High Court quashed FIR under Section 25 Arms Act against petitioner for possession of empty magazines, holding absence of conscious possession and inapplicability of minor ammunition exemption.
DELHI STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED v. HARI OM GUPTA
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's order setting aside forfeiture of leave encashment where no financial loss to the government was proved in disciplinary proceedings.
Nidhi Goyal v. Guddu Chaudhary & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging the Trial Court’s refusal to reopen plaintiff’s evidence due to the petitioner’s failure to file the list of witnesses within the mandatory period, affirming the limited scope of revisional jurisdiction under Section 115 CPC.
Staff Selection Commission v. Amitabh Yadav & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the CAT's consent order directing consideration of the candidate as OBC and granting consequential benefits, ordering compliance within four weeks.
Sonu v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279 and 338 IPC following an amicable settlement and compensation, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Amit Kumar & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable matrimonial settlement, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of the court's process.
Union of India and Anr. v. Ashok Kumar Dhiman
The High Court upheld the Tribunal’s order directing payment of interest on delayed leave encashment, affirming that retiral benefits are valuable rights attracting interest on delay.
M/S SS ENTERPRISES v. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER, CGST DELHI, NORTH
The Delhi High Court set aside the rejection of revocation of GST registration cancellation for failure to afford an opportunity of hearing and directed fresh consideration after the petitioner responds to specific allegations.
M/S Chauhan Construction Co. v. Commissioner of DGST and Anr
The Delhi High Court set aside the cancellation of GST registration for failure to provide intelligible reasons and opportunity of hearing, directing restoration of registration subject to compliance.
Himanshu Khatter and Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of process.