Delhi High Court
47,108 judgments
Satish Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed the dismissal of a CISF Sub-Inspector falsely implicated in a sexual harassment case, directing his reinstatement with benefits and partial back wages.
Amarjit Singh Kohli v. Ashok Kumar Sapra
The Delhi High Court held that a suit for specific performance based on an oral agreement to sell immovable property is maintainable and cannot be summarily rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC if the plaint discloses a cause of action.
Ashish Azad v. The National Insurance Company Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal of Ashish Azad, upholding the MACT's finding that he was the driver liable to pay compensation for a motor vehicle accident despite his claim of being a passenger.
KANBE WATER TECH PRIVATE LIMITED v. DOMUS GREENS PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner’s notice satisfied Section 21 requirements and appointed an independent Sole Arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, deleting respondent no.2 from the parties.
KANBE WATER TECH PRIVATE LIMITED v. ANAND DEVINE DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court held that the notice dated 18.03.2024 constituted a valid invocation under Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and appointed an independent Sole Arbitrator under Section 11(6) to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.
Raj Kumar Wadhera v. Canara Bank
The Delhi High Court held that AVSD with severe pulmonary hypertension is not a recognized disability under the Disabilities Acts but ordered restoration of salary deducted without due process during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Abhijit Kumar Ravidas v. The National Insurance Company Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a registered owner remains liable to third-party compensation for a motor vehicle accident until ownership is officially transferred in RTO records, even if the vehicle was sold and possession delivered prior to the accident.
M/S Adams International Exports (P) Ltd & Anr. v. Vishan Dass Narang
The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order under the Delhi Rent Control Act, rejecting tenants' plea of defective summons and delay in filing leave to defend, and held tenants liable to pay user and occupation charges during pendency of revision.
M/S Adam Paper Products Pvt Ltd & Anr v. Vishan Dass Narang
The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order, rejecting tenants' plea of defective summons and delay in filing leave to defend, and held tenants liable to pay user and occupation charges during pendency of revision petition.
Mohan Singh v. Vishan Dass Narang
The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order, dismissed the tenant's revision petition for defective service and delay, and held the tenant liable to pay user and occupation charges during pendency of the revision petition.
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-3 v. ESYS Information Technologies Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue’s appeal, affirming that goodwill paid as part of asset acquisition is an intangible asset eligible for depreciation and rejecting the Revenue’s contention on arm’s length price adjustments involving a foreign associated enterprise.
Lakhan Rajput & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of court process.
Prashant Batra v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354 and 323 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 528 BNSS to prevent abuse of process in minor offences.
Sh. Maganjeet Singh Khara @ Sunder & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323/341/506/509/354/34 IPC arising from a boundary wall dispute due to an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Kamal Kishore Sharma & Anr v. State Through SHO, PS Rajouri Garden & Ors
The Delhi High Court quashed cross FIRs arising from a minor altercation after amicable settlement under Section 528 BNSS, emphasizing the power to prevent abuse of process in minor criminal disputes.
Pradeep Mittal & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed two FIRs involving mutual assault under IPC after amicable settlement between parties, exercising its power under Section 528 BNSS to prevent abuse of process.
Ankit Bansal v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 469, 500, and 509 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process.
Gurmeet Singh & Ors. v. The State
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 363/34 IPC relating to a custody dispute following an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Abrar Bale v. State Through Crime Branch SHO
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of the petitioner accused under the NDPS Act, holding that reasonable grounds exist to believe his guilt and risk of reoffending, thus bail is not warranted under Section 37 of the NDPS Act.
Sunita & Anr. v. Yogesh Kumar
The Delhi High Court allowed the wife's revision petition, setting aside the Family Court's order and directing maintenance payments under Sections 125 and 127 CrPC, holding that the wife was entitled to maintenance as she was forced to live separately due to cruelty.