Delhi High Court

47,108 judgments

Year:

Satish Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.

08 Oct 2024 · Rekha Palli; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:7810-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed the dismissal of a CISF Sub-Inspector falsely implicated in a sexual harassment case, directing his reinstatement with benefits and partial back wages.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant departmental inquiry sexual harassment dismissal from service reinstatement

Amarjit Singh Kohli v. Ashok Kumar Sapra

08 Oct 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:8486

The Delhi High Court held that a suit for specific performance based on an oral agreement to sell immovable property is maintainable and cannot be summarily rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC if the plaint discloses a cause of action.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Oral Agreement to Sell Specific Performance Order VII Rule 11 CPC Cause of Action

Ashish Azad v. The National Insurance Company Limited & Ors.

08 Oct 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:8484

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal of Ashish Azad, upholding the MACT's finding that he was the driver liable to pay compensation for a motor vehicle accident despite his claim of being a passenger.

motor_vehicles appeal_dismissed Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 driver liability compensation FIR

KANBE WATER TECH PRIVATE LIMITED v. DOMUS GREENS PRIVATE LIMITED

08 Oct 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:7878

The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner’s notice satisfied Section 21 requirements and appointed an independent Sole Arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, deleting respondent no.2 from the parties.

arbitration appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Section 21 notice Appointment of Sole Arbitrator

KANBE WATER TECH PRIVATE LIMITED v. ANAND DEVINE DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED

08 Oct 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:7879

The Delhi High Court held that the notice dated 18.03.2024 constituted a valid invocation under Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and appointed an independent Sole Arbitrator under Section 11(6) to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.

other appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Section 21 notice Appointment of arbitrator

Raj Kumar Wadhera v. Canara Bank

08 Oct 2024 · Jyoti Singh · 2024:DHC:8367
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that AVSD with severe pulmonary hypertension is not a recognized disability under the Disabilities Acts but ordered restoration of salary deducted without due process during the COVID-19 pandemic.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant disability definition Persons with Disabilities Act 1995 Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act 2016 AVSD

Abhijit Kumar Ravidas v. The National Insurance Company Limited & Ors.

08 Oct 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:8324

The Delhi High Court held that a registered owner remains liable to third-party compensation for a motor vehicle accident until ownership is officially transferred in RTO records, even if the vehicle was sold and possession delivered prior to the accident.

motor_vehicles_accident_compensation appeal_dismissed Significant registered owner liability motor vehicle accident transfer of ownership RTO records

M/S Adams International Exports (P) Ltd & Anr. v. Vishan Dass Narang

08 Oct 2024 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:8193

The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order under the Delhi Rent Control Act, rejecting tenants' plea of defective summons and delay in filing leave to defend, and held tenants liable to pay user and occupation charges during pendency of revision.

property petition_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 25B eviction leave to defend

M/S Adam Paper Products Pvt Ltd & Anr v. Vishan Dass Narang

08 Oct 2024 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:8192

The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order, rejecting tenants' plea of defective summons and delay in filing leave to defend, and held tenants liable to pay user and occupation charges during pendency of revision petition.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 eviction leave to defend user and occupation charges

Mohan Singh v. Vishan Dass Narang

08 Oct 2024 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:8191

The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order, dismissed the tenant's revision petition for defective service and delay, and held the tenant liable to pay user and occupation charges during pendency of the revision petition.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 leave to defend eviction user and occupation charges

The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-3 v. ESYS Information Technologies Ltd

08 Oct 2024 · Vibhu BakhrU; Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:7812-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue’s appeal, affirming that goodwill paid as part of asset acquisition is an intangible asset eligible for depreciation and rejecting the Revenue’s contention on arm’s length price adjustments involving a foreign associated enterprise.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant goodwill intangible asset depreciation Section 37(1) Income Tax Act

Lakhan Rajput & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr

08 Oct 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:7806

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of court process.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC amicable settlement

Prashant Batra v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

08 Oct 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:7820

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354 and 323 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 528 BNSS to prevent abuse of process in minor offences.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 528 BNSS quashing of FIR amicable settlement minor offences

Sh. Maganjeet Singh Khara @ Sunder & Ors. v. State & Anr.

08 Oct 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:7823

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323/341/506/509/354/34 IPC arising from a boundary wall dispute due to an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR amicable settlement minor offences

Kamal Kishore Sharma & Anr v. State Through SHO, PS Rajouri Garden & Ors

08 Oct 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:7849

The Delhi High Court quashed cross FIRs arising from a minor altercation after amicable settlement under Section 528 BNSS, emphasizing the power to prevent abuse of process in minor criminal disputes.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 528 BNSS quashing of FIR amicable settlement minor offences

Pradeep Mittal & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

08 Oct 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:7875

The Delhi High Court quashed two FIRs involving mutual assault under IPC after amicable settlement between parties, exercising its power under Section 528 BNSS to prevent abuse of process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 528 BNSS quashing of FIR amicable settlement abuse of process

Ankit Bansal v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

08 Oct 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:7825

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 469, 500, and 509 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR amicable settlement abuse of process

Gurmeet Singh & Ors. v. The State

08 Oct 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:7826

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 363/34 IPC relating to a custody dispute following an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR custody dispute Section 363 IPC

Abrar Bale v. State Through Crime Branch SHO

08 Oct 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:7985
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of the petitioner accused under the NDPS Act, holding that reasonable grounds exist to believe his guilt and risk of reoffending, thus bail is not warranted under Section 37 of the NDPS Act.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant NDPS Act Section 37 NDPS Act bail reasonable grounds

Sunita & Anr. v. Yogesh Kumar

08 Oct 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:7978

The Delhi High Court allowed the wife's revision petition, setting aside the Family Court's order and directing maintenance payments under Sections 125 and 127 CrPC, holding that the wife was entitled to maintenance as she was forced to live separately due to cruelty.

family appeal_allowed Significant Section 125 CrPC maintenance deserted wife harassment