Lakhan Rajput & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr

Delhi High Court · 08 Oct 2024 · 2024:DHC:7806
Anoop Kumar Mendiratta
CRL.M.C. 7255/2024
2024:DHC:7806
criminal petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of court process.

Full Text
Translation output
CRL.M.C. 7255/2024
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 08.10.2024
CRL.M.C. 7255/2024
LAKHAN RAJPUT & ORS. .....Petitioners
Through: Mr. R. K. Mishra and Mr. J. K.
Sharma, Advs. alongwith petitioners in person.
VERSUS
THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents
Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for the State
WITH
SI Kunal Kumar, PS Binda Pur.
Mr. Uday Shanker Varshney, Adv. for R-2 alongwith R-2 in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA
JUDGMENT
ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J (ORAL)

1. Petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (‘BNSS’) has been preferred on behalf of the petitioners for quashing of FIR No. 1010/2021, under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, registered at P.S.: Binda Pur and proceedings emanating therefrom.

2. Issue notice. Learned APP for the State and learned counsel for respondent No. 2 along with respondent No. 2 in person appear on advance notice and accept notice.

3. In brief, as per the case of the petitioners, marriage between petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 was solemnized according to Hindu rites and ceremonies in 16.02.2021. No child was born out of the wedlock. Due to matrimonial differences, petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 started living separately. On complaint of respondent No. 2, present FIR was registered on 15.12.2021.

4. The disputes are stated to have been amicably settled between the parties in terms of Settlement dated 21.10.2023. The marriage between petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 has been dissolved by decree of divorce by way of mutual consent under Section 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act vide judgment dated 22.12.2023.

5. An amount of Rs. 20,000/- has been paid to respondent No. 2 today through DD No. 604664 dated 05.10.2024 drawn on Kotak Mahindra Bank, in favour of respondent No. 2.

6. Learned APP for the State submits that in view of amicable settlement between the parties, she has no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed.

7. Petitioners and respondent No. 2 are present in person and have been identified by SI Kunal Kumar, P.S.: Binda Pur. I have interacted with the parties and they confirm that the matter has been amicably settled between them without any threat, pressure or coercion. Respondent No. 2 also states that nothing remains to be further adjudicated upon between the parties and she has no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed.

8. Considering the facts and circumstances, since the matter has been amicably settled between the parties, no useful purpose shall be served by keeping the case pending. It would be nothing but an abuse of the process of Court. The chances of conviction are bleak in view of amicable settlement between the parties. Consequently, FIR No. 1010/2021, under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, registered at P.S.: Binda Pur and proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. Petition is accordingly disposed of. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J OCTOBER 8, 2024 p