Delhi High Court

92,628 judgments

Year:

NARENDRA PATIL v. ZUBAIR RIAZ KAMILI & ORS.

09 Dec 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:9542

The Delhi High Court directed customs authorities to release detained gold chains without insisting on warehouse charges, affirming that such charges cannot justify illegal detention once customs duty and penalty are paid.

administrative petition_allowed Significant customs duty penalty warehouse charges detention of goods

Manish Kumar Mishra v. Union of India

07 Dec 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:3208-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court set aside a medical board's disqualification of a candidate for CISF appointment, holding that absence of functional limitation despite partial finger amputation entitles fitness certification.

administrative petition_allowed medical fitness partial amputation Assistant Sub Inspector Central Industrial Security Forces

The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Shanno & Ors.

06 Dec 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:10150

The Delhi High Court upheld a compensation award based on credible oral evidence of the deceased's income in an unorganized sector, dismissing the insurance company's appeal challenging the quantum.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 compensation loss of dependency unorganized sector

Rashmi Sharma v. Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co Ltd

06 Dec 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:10080

The Delhi High Court allowed an appeal to enhance compensation in a motor accident claim by averaging the deceased's variable monthly income to arrive at a just and reasonable amount.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 compensation enhancement loss of dependency average income

HRTC Nalagarh Ors v. Vijay Ram

06 Dec 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:10155

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging compensation awarded for injuries sustained in a road accident, upholding the Tribunal's quantum based on minimum wages and injury severity despite brief hospitalization.

civil appeal_dismissed Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 compensation loss of income pain and suffering

Abbott Products Operations AG & Anr. v. Atlantis Formulations Private Limited & Ors.

06 Dec 2024 · Mini Pushkarna · 2024:DHC:10073

The Delhi High Court upheld a settlement decree against two defendants and passed an ex parte decree against a third for trademark infringement of pharmaceutical marks, applying stringent scrutiny and Order VIII Rule 10 CPC for non-appearance.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement passing off pharmaceutical products Order VIII Rule 10 CPC

Om Prakash Chauhan v. Union of India and Others

06 Dec 2024 · Jyoti Singh · 2024:DHC:9485

The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing allotment of alternate land to legal heirs of a landowner whose entire land was acquired, holding that subsequent ownership of residential property does not disqualify eligibility under the 1986 policy.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act 1894 alternate plot allotment 1986 policy ownership of residential property

Sh Naresh Rohilla v. M/S Larsen and Toubro Ltd.

06 Dec 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:9445
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a manpower services contract containing an arbitration clause.

other petition_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) arbitral tribunal appointment arbitration agreement

Indraprastha Logistics Private Limited v. Naveen Kumar & Ors.

06 Dec 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:9962

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order granting recovery rights to the insurance company against the vehicle owner and intoxicated driver, holding that driving under influence constitutes a fundamental breach of the insurance policy.

motor_vehicles_accident_claims appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Recovery Rights Intoxication Fundamental Breach

Jai Prakash v. Khalid Hussan

06 Dec 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:9961

The Delhi High Court held that the injured was not a gratuitous passenger and enhanced compensation by holding the Insurance Company liable, applying correct disability assessment, future prospects, and skilled wage classification.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act gratuitous passenger insurance liability functional disability

Charu Pillani v. M/s Frankfinn Aviation Services Pvt. Ltd.

06 Dec 2024 · Vikas Mahajan, J. · 2024:DHC:9739

The Delhi High Court held that a non-signatory to a cheque cannot be prosecuted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and quashed the complaint against the petitioner accordingly.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Cheque dishonour Non-signatory liability Section 141 Negotiable Instruments Act

Bansal Construction Co. v. Union of India

06 Dec 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:9443
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court appointed an independent Sole Arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate contractual disputes between Bansal Construction Co. and Union of India arising from a railway contract.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Section 12(5) Sole Arbitrator appointment

M/S REINFORCED EARTH INDIA PVT LTD v. RK INFRACORP PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR

06 Dec 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:9444
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate payment disputes arising from a tripartite agreement, affirming the validity of the arbitration clause and directing arbitration proceedings to commence.

civil petition_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(5) arbitral tribunal appointment arbitration agreement

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -7, Delhi v. Punjab National Bank

06 Dec 2024 · The Acting Chief Justice; Mr. Justice Tushar Rao Gedela Vibh... · 2024:DHC:9728-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, holding that Section 14A disallowance does not apply to shares held as stock-in-trade with incidental exempt income, and upheld the ITAT's deletion of various additions including pension fund contributions and losses on HTM securities.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 14A Income Tax Act Rule 8D Income Tax Rules exempt income stock-in-trade

J. Chakraborty v. M/S GAIL (INDIA) LIMITED & ANR

06 Dec 2024 · Jyoti Singh, J. · 2024:DHC:9627

The Delhi High Court upheld the downgrading of the petitioner's performance appraisal reports under a valid moderation policy, dismissing his writ petition challenging the same and denying promotion relief.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Performance Appraisal Report Promotion Moderation Policy Performance Management System

Anil Kumar Mokharia v. Union of India and Others

06 Dec 2024 · Navin Chawla; Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:9521-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court allowed the review petition and directed reconsideration of the petitioner’s appointment in armed forces recruitment, holding that mere suspicion of flap-less refractive surgery without conclusive evidence cannot justify rejection.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant medical fitness armed forces recruitment refractive surgery visual acuity

Rajender Singh v. Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co Ltd

06 Dec 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:9642

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by including future prospects and increasing non-pecuniary damages while upholding the assessment of functional disability and wage rate.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim permanent disability functional disability future prospects

CROSSFIT, LLC v. MOHAN LAL SIRVI

06 Dec 2024 · AMIT BANSAL · 2024:DHC:9623

The Delhi High Court granted summary judgment awarding damages and costs to CrossFit, LLC against a defendant infringing its well-known trademark 'CrossFit' who failed to contest the claim.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement passing off summary judgment Order XIII-A CPC

P- 1 & brother of P-2 v. Rajinder Pal and Another

06 Dec 2024 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:9595

The Delhi High Court granted condonation of delay and a conditional stay of an eviction order allowing tenants additional time to vacate subject to payment of occupation charges and compliance with court-ordered undertakings.

property appeal_allowed condonation of delay eviction order stay of eviction user and occupation charges

Sun Broadcast Equipments Pvt Ltd v. Prasar Bharati

06 Dec 2024 · The Acting Chief Justice; Tushar Rao Gedela; Vibhu BakhrU · 2024:DHC:9448-DB

The Delhi High Court held that equipment discontinued by manufacturers is not necessarily "end-of-life" if warranty and maintenance support exist, and dismissed the petition challenging the lowest bid after contract completion.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant end-of-life equipment tender conditions technical specifications warranty