Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
UPSRTC v. Arti Devi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld territorial jurisdiction but reduced compensation by applying Uttar Pradesh minimum wages instead of Delhi wages in a motor accident claim.
Kuljit Singh v. Pawan Goyal
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the decree for recovery of ₹8,23,677 with interest where the defendant had acknowledged liability by agreement and availed GST credit despite alleging conspiracy and forgery.
Rakesh Sabharwal and Anr. v. State and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the order allowing investigation into the alleged forgery of a Will, holding that such allegations constitute cognizable offences warranting criminal inquiry despite concurrent civil disputes.
Dinesh Kumar Dabas & Anr. v. Tilak Raj
The Delhi High Court allowed the revision petition and granted summary decree for refund of advance paid under an Agreement to Sell frustrated by government acquisition of the property.
Jagmohan Mehra thru LR Ajay Mehra v. Trilochan Singh Bawa & Anr
The Delhi High Court granted the tenant additional time to vacate the premises by staying the eviction order subject to an undertaking ensuring vacant possession and payment of dues by 15.01.2025.
Tej Kishen & Ors. v. UOI & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition of Kashmiri Migrant Central Government retirees seeking amendment of payment terms in a housing scheme, holding that the scheme's distinct terms were valid and petitioners' delay and misrepresentation barred relief.
Draka Comteq B.V. v. The Controller of Patents, Designs and Trademarks
The Delhi High Court set aside the refusal of a patent application for a multimode optical fiber, holding that the invention was novel and remanding the matter for a reasoned reconsideration of inventive step.
Largan Precision Co Ltd v. Motorola Mobility India Pvt Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff's application for interrogatories and constitution of a confidentiality club in a patent infringement suit, emphasizing a liberal approach to disclosure to ensure fair and efficient adjudication.
Vijay Kumar v. Farmuda Begum
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order striking off the defence for non-compliance with payment directions, emphasizing that litigants cannot evade liability by blaming their advocates.
Nirmal Chandra Mandal v. Director General CISF
The Delhi High Court directed CISF authorities to reconsider the petitioner's transfer requests in accordance with policy guidelines, emphasizing the need for reasoned orders when denying alternate posting preferences.
Salasar E-Waste LLP v. DY CMM Northern Railway & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the lawful forfeiture of the Earnest Money Deposit due to the bidder's failure to pay the Balance Sale Value within the stipulated auction timelines.
Bal Kishan v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the DDA to treat a writ petition as a representation, provide a personal hearing, and decide the matter by a reasoned order within twelve weeks, allowing further legal recourse if aggrieved.
Nitin Saxena v. Amit Saxena
The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit for cancellation of registered release deeds as barred by limitation and lacking cause of action, affirming that limitation runs from the date of execution and non-payment of consideration does not invalidate the transfer.
Maj. (Retd.) Dr. Rajesh Kumar Bhardwaj v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that the Armed Forces Tribunal erred in adjourning a review application sine die due to a similar pending Supreme Court appeal and must decide the matter on existing law without undue delay.
MWO Prasanna Kumar Mohapatra (Retd) v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging denial of service extension in the Armed Forces due to non-compliance with mandatory medical examination requirements despite personal and pandemic-related hardships.
Manoj Kumar & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed respondents to consider belated representations against recovery of training allowance and restrained recovery pending decision, without expressing opinion on merits.
Shriram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Hardan Yadav & Ors.
The Delhi High Court partly allowed the insurer's appeal in a motor accident claim, revising compensation by adjusting future prospects and loss of consortium while affirming contributory negligence and liability principles.
The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Ombir Singh
The Delhi High Court recalculated compensation for a motor accident victim's family, affirming joint liability of insurance companies and applying enhanced future prospects and appropriate deductions for a deceased homemaker.
IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. v. Pooja & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the sole negligence of a truck driver who negligently parked his vehicle without warning signals causing a fatal accident, dismissing the insurer's appeal and affirming full compensation to the victim's legal heirs.
HRTC Nalagarh v. Savita & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the bus driver was solely negligent in a rear-end collision at a traffic signal, set aside contributory negligence attributed to the deceased Scooty driver, and enhanced the compensation awarded to the claimants.