Delhi High Court

92,628 judgments

Year:

Naresh Chand v. Roshan Lal & Ors.

06 Dec 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:10201

The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of objections in execution proceedings, holding that execution courts cannot re-examine the validity of a final possession decree based on a license under a government rehabilitation scheme.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Section 47 CPC Execution proceedings Rehabilitation Scheme License vs ownership

Ashwani Kumar v. Indian Oil Corporation Limited & Ors.

06 Dec 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:10146-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld cancellation of a compassionate appointment due to medical unfitness and abolition of the post but allowed the appellant to seek monetary rehabilitation benefits in lieu of employment.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant compassionate appointment medical fitness rehabilitation scheme abolition of post

Indian Council of Agricultural Research v. Birender Singh

06 Dec 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:9717-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's interim orders directing payment of salary to a driver whose transfer was challenged, dismissing the petition against the status quo and salary directives.

administrative petition_dismissed transfer order status quo salary payment Central Administrative Tribunal

Manoj Kumar v. Govt. of NCTD Through the Commissioner of Police and Ors.

05 Dec 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:8910-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The High Court set aside the unreasoned Tribunal order dismissing the petition challenging dismissal for unauthorized absence and remanded the matter for fresh consideration with proper reasoning.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant departmental enquiry unauthorized absence dismissal from service disciplinary proceedings

SUN PHARMA LABORATORIES LIMITED v. NARENDER KUMAR & ORS.

05 Dec 2024 · Mini Pushkarna · 2024:DHC:10072

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and summary judgment in favor of Sun Pharma, restraining defendants from using the deceptively similar mark 'CAFTADAY' for pharmaceutical products, emphasizing higher scrutiny for medicinal trademarks and awarding costs.

civil appeal_allowed Significant passing off unfair competition pharmaceutical trademarks deceptive similarity

Jai Prakash v. Smt. Prem Lata

05 Dec 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:10040

The Delhi High Court partly allowed a revision petition permitting examination of a handwriting expert at a belated stage while dismissing the application to summon official witnesses, emphasizing relevancy and procedural propriety.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Revision Petition Section 115 CPC Order XV Rule 1(3) CPC Section 45 Indian Evidence Act

Union of India v. M/S Parishudh Machines Pvt. Ltd.

05 Dec 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:9953

The Delhi High Court held that interest on an arbitration award continues to accrue until the awarded amount is actually deposited and made available to the decree holder, dismissing the petitioner's claim that mere tendering of cheques stopped interest liability.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant arbitration award execution petition interest on decretal amount deposit of award amount

Nandan Mukherjee v. Mohd Rafiq and Ors.

05 Dec 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:9882

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for a motor accident victim by averaging income tax returns, adding future prospects, correcting multiplier, and increasing prosthetic limb and attendant charges while denying loss of consortium claims.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 compensation enhancement income assessment permanent disability

Ayush Verma v. LRS of Beeru Verma & Anr.

05 Dec 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:9871

The Delhi High Court held that negligence of the deceased driver was established and remanded the matter for compensation determination under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, allowing the appellant's appeal.

motor_vehicles/compensation appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166 Section 163A negligence

Davinder Goyal & Anr. v. Vikram Singh & Ors.

05 Dec 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:9807

The Delhi High Court allowed the motor accident claim appeal, holding that the driver's own statement established rashness and negligence, and remanded the matter for fresh compensation determination.

motor_accident_claims appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166 rashness and negligence DD entry

Ajit Kumar v. State NCT of Delhi

05 Dec 2024 · Vikas Mahajan · 2024:DHC:9716

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings against a police constable after his exoneration in departmental enquiry on identical charges, holding that continuation of prosecution would be an abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing FIR departmental enquiry exoneration standard of proof

Federated Hermes Ltd v. John Doe & Ors.

05 Dec 2024 · Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:9689

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction against unknown defendants for fraudulent use of Federated Hermes’ trademarks and copyrights in investment scams and decreed the suit under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC due to non-contestation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement copyright infringement passing off permanent injunction

Commissioner of Central Tax, GST Delhi East v. A S P Metal Industries

05 Dec 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:9415-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the CESTAT order dismissing the Revenue's demand for duty and confiscation due to lack of credible evidence of clandestine removal under the Central Excise Act.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant clandestine removal central excise preponderance of probabilities retracted statements

Sandeep Kumar v. Director General Coast Guard Headquarters and Ors.

05 Dec 2024 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:9422-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking exemption from reporting for duty before resignation, holding that procedural requirements must be followed and the court will not interfere under Article 226 without violation of law.

administrative petition_dismissed resignation from service reporting for duty marked state Article 226

MajorAnish Muralidhar v. COL Bhaskar Dev Burman

05 Dec 2024 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:9498-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting disability pension broad-banded to 50% for life to a retired army officer, affirming entitlement based on medical certification of service aggravation and limiting arrears due to delay.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension broad-banding Armed Forces Tribunal service aggravation

Singh, Sgt. Mritunjay, Legal Cell, Air Force v. GP Capt S Mediratta

05 Dec 2024 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:9500-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting disability pension after finding that administrative interference in medical board opinion was illegal and unjustified.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant disability pension medical board opinion Armed Forces Tribunal mala fide

Sh Raghuveer Singh v. Union of India

05 Dec 2024 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:9456-DB

The Delhi High Court directed reconsideration of a BSF officer's transfer order on medical grounds and restrained its enforcement pending decision.

administrative other transfer order medical condition government servant dialysis

Union of India & Ors. v. SL-3939F COL MPC Rao (Retd.)

05 Dec 2024 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:9497-DB

The High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting disability pension after finding that the medical board's altered opinion was influenced by administrative pressure and thus illegal.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension medical board opinion mala fide Armed Forces Tribunal

Umang Realtech Pvt Ltd v. Mrs Daphne Reita Rajan Sharma & Anr

05 Dec 2024 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:9426-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the mandatory pre-deposit requirement under Section 43(5) of RERA for appeals filed by promoters, rejecting exemption claims based on insolvency moratorium and security offered.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant RERA Section 43(5) pre-deposit requirement Real Estate Appellate Tribunal moratorium

Subhash Chand v. Union of India

05 Dec 2024 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:9419-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the removal of a CISF constable for misconduct and unauthorized absence, finding no procedural irregularity or violation of natural justice in the departmental inquiry.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant departmental inquiry natural justice overstay of leave unauthorized absence