Delhi High Court
38,124 judgments
Triveni Engineering and Industries Ltd. v. Vijay Bhatia and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that registration under the MSMED Act must precede contract execution to claim its benefits, setting aside Facilitation Council orders referring disputes to arbitration for lack of jurisdiction.
Noor Ahamd & Anr v. Mohd Sadiq
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenants' revision petition challenging eviction after possession was restored to the landlord, holding such petitions infructuous and affirming the limited scope of revisional jurisdiction under the Delhi Rent Control Act.
MONEYWISE FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT LTD v. STAR MARINE SOLUTIONS THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR SH ANUJ SHARMA AND ANR
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate loan repayment disputes arising from a valid arbitration agreement despite respondents' non-appearance.
Bhojraj v. HDFC Ergo Gen. Ins. Co. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal seeking enhancement of compensation for permanent disability in a motor accident case, upholding the Tribunal's award based on functional disability assessed as a percentage of the whole body and absence of loss of income.
The Chief Executive Officer J&K ERA v. M/S Abhiram Infra Projects Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that an application to set aside an arbitral award filed beyond the prescribed limitation period under the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot be condoned, and the Jammu & Kashmir Arbitration Act or its amendments do not apply when the seat of arbitration is outside Jammu & Kashmir.
Tushar Tamang v. State N.C.T. of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court refused to quash the FIR based on unverified CCTV footage but directed further investigation to include this evidence to ensure a fair trial.
Smt. Mani Kapoor v. U.P.S.R.T.C. Through Its Regional Manager Bhaemsali Depot, Meerut
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by upholding functional disability assessment and increasing non-pecuniary damages, recognizing the economic value of a housewife's work based on skilled worker wages.
Sunder Singh Bisht v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's refusal to recall the child victim for re-examination after a five-year delay, emphasizing protection of the child witness and preventing abuse of process under the POCSO Act.
FENA PRIVATE LTD v. BALWINDER KUMAR & ANR
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to cancel the trademark 'NIPPU' for deceptive similarity with the prior registered and extensively used trademark 'NIP', directing its removal from the Register of Trade Marks.
Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)-2 v. Genpact Consulting Singapore Pte Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's quashing of revisional proceedings under Section 263, holding that the Assessing Officer's order was not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue and that the Commissioner cannot revise an order based on mere change of opinion or inadequate inquiry.
Daljeet Auto Centre v. Jagmohan Singh Bakshi
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction petition under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, affirming the landlord's bona fide requirement and limiting the scope of revision under Section 25-B(8) to supervisory review without reappraisal of evidence.
Ajay Vishwakarma & Ors. v. The New India Assurance Co. Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside 50% contributory negligence against a deceased pedestrian, applied Uttar Pradesh minimum wages for compensation, enhanced loss of consortium and interest, and directed the Insurance Company to pay Rs. 16,32,500/-.
SH Nepal Singh Koli v. SH Mukesh Chand & Anr.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation under non-pecuniary heads in a motor accident claim while upholding the functional disability assessment, increasing total compensation from Rs. 9.28 lakh to Rs. 10.28 lakh.
Manisha v. Mukesh Chand & Anr.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for a motor accident victim by aligning functional disability with certified permanent impairment, recognizing household work as basis for loss of future earnings.
M/S Sunrise Enterprises v. Irrigation and Flood Control Department Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate contract disputes after exhaustion of the contractual dispute resolution mechanism.
MONEYWISE FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT LTD v. GOEL TRADERS THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR SH SANJAY KUMAR AND ANR
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to adjudicate loan repayment disputes arising from a valid arbitration agreement.
PNB Housing Finance Ltd v. M/S K.K BANIJYA PVT LTD & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that where an arbitration agreement exists and is undisputed, the court must appoint an arbitral tribunal under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, regardless of disputes on merits or settlement claims.
Rajbala v. Mukesh Chand & Anr.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for a motor accident victim by aligning Functional Disability with Permanent Physical Impairment, recognizing loss of future earnings for a housewife.
M/S SAMSUNG INDIA ELECTRONICS PRIVATE LIMITED v. JAISWAL TECHNO COMMERCIAL & ORS
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator through DIAC under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, directing arbitration to proceed despite respondent’s non-appearance, affirming the validity and enforceability of the arbitration agreement.
Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan & Ors. v. Dr Arvind Kumar
The Delhi High Court declined to interfere with a Tribunal's ad interim order, allowing the writ petition to be withdrawn subject to caveats and directing the Tribunal to proceed with the OA.