Delhi High Court
38,124 judgments
Golf Designs v. Shapoorji Pallonji and Company Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate payment disputes, holding that limitation and jurisdiction objections are to be decided by the arbitrator.
Jitender Kumar Tomar v. Jitender Singh
The High Court upheld a money recovery decree under Order XXXVII CPC, holding that service of summons at the counsel's address furnished by the defendant is valid and the defendant cannot claim deprivation of opportunity to defend.
MS RRB ENERGY LIMITED v. MS LAPLIFE ELECTRONICS PVT LTD & ORS
The Delhi High Court disposed of a contempt petition by recording parties' consent for inspection of leased premises as per court directions, emphasizing compliance and trial court jurisdiction over objections.
Pushpa Pandey v. Shivam & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition for non-compliance of demolition directions, holding that partial compliance and availability of alternative remedies preclude contempt proceedings.
New India Structures Pvt. Ltd. v. Bird Execujet Airport Services Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to adjudicate contractual disputes after failed mediation and non-appointment by parties.
Siya Ram v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court directed the DDA to execute the conveyance deed without sale restrictions as the five-year embargo period from restoration of allotment had elapsed, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.
Ravinder Kaur v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court held that the five-year embargo on sale of a DDA flat is reckoned from the date of restoration of allotment, and since this period had elapsed, the petitioner was entitled to execution of the conveyance deed without sale restrictions.
Rekha Gupta v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court directed the DDA to regularize a minor delayed payment with interest and hand over vacant possession of the plot within eight months or provide an alternative plot to the petitioner.
Raj Kumar v. Reserve Bank of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the bank to restrict lien to the disputed amount credited in the petitioner's account during a criminal investigation, allowing the petitioner to operate the remainder of the account.
Bonanza Enterprises v. The Assistant Commissioner of Customs & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside a Customs adjudication order for failure to properly serve the Show Cause Notice, directing fresh service by email and hearing in compliance with Section 153 of the Customs Act.
Bonanza Enterprises v. The Assistant Commissioner of Customs & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside a Customs Order for lack of proper service, directing fresh notice by email and hearing, emphasizing that service under Section 153 of the Customs Act must ensure actual receipt to uphold natural justice.
Shri Balaji Enterprises v. Additional Director General New Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an eight-year delayed show-cause notice under the Customs Act, holding that statutory time limits for adjudication must be strictly adhered to and unexplained delays render proceedings invalid.
Staff Selection Commission & Anr. v. Mukul Choudhary
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing a fresh digital measurement of the respondent's height due to discrepancies in earlier tests, dismissing the petition challenging the same.
Shabana v. New India Assurance Company Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that in motor accident claims where the driver is deceased, his legal heirs must be impleaded to establish negligence, but inability to trace them should not lead to dismissal of the claim petitions.
M/S Anand and Co v. Airport Authority of India
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate contractual disputes where the respondent failed to respond to arbitration notice, and directed interim relief applications to be decided by the arbitrator.
Elder Orgichem Pvt Ltd v. Elder Prroject Ltd
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte injunction restraining trademark use due to alleged concealment and directed a fresh hearing of the injunction application with both parties heard.
Harish Verma v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court modified interim custody arrangements prioritizing the children's welfare, ensuring visitation rights, and discharged contempt proceedings against the petitioner with conditions.
Nitin Khandelwal v. Union of India and Others
The Delhi High Court directed the government respondents to finalize and release the petitioner's outstanding salary and allowances within four weeks, emphasizing timely settlement of dues and transparency.
Ranjan Kumar v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an honourable acquittal precludes withdrawal of a provisional appointment in CISF without due process and directed reinstatement of the petitioner.
Ankit Tracom Pvt Ltd v. Imperia Structures Ltd
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that the arbitration agreement in the Unit Buyer Agreement subsists despite subsequent sale deeds and that jurisdictional objections are to be decided by the arbitral tribunal.