Delhi High Court

103,150 judgments

Year:

Harmanjit Singh v. State & Anr.

22 Feb 2013 · Sunil Gaur · 2013:DHC:6918

The Delhi High Court quashed FIR No. 230/1999 under Section 379 IPC read with the Indian Electricity Act against the petitioners based on the prosecution's no objection affidavit.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 379 IPC Indian Electricity Act Section 482 CrPC

Sushila Kaul v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

22 Feb 2013 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Veena Birbal · 2013:DHC:1000-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's dismissal of a delayed claim for pay revision and arrears as barred by limitation under the Administrative Tribunals Act.

administrative petition_dismissed limitation pay revision arrears Administrative Tribunals Act

Om Prakash & Ors. v. Commissioner, North Municipal Corporation of Delhi

22 Feb 2013 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Veena Birbal · 2013:DHC:1005-DB

The Delhi High Court held that posts sanctioned by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi form a promotional hierarchy for ACP financial upgradation even without Delhi Government approval of Recruitment Rules, entitling petitioners to higher pay scales.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Assured Career Progression Scheme Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme Municipal Corporation of Delhi promotional hierarchy

Babita Pathak & Others v. High Court of Delhi

22 Feb 2013 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; V.K. Jain · 2013:DHC:995-DB

The Delhi High Court held that carry-forward of reserved vacancies for physically handicapped persons beyond one recruitment year is permissible and does not confer appointment rights on General category candidates, dismissing their challenge to the reservation scheme in the Delhi Judicial Service Examination 2010.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995 Section 36 Reservation Carry-forward vacancies

Manoj v. The State of NCT of Delhi

22 Feb 2013 · S.P. Garg · 2013:DHC:1004

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for rape based on credible uncorroborated testimony of the prosecutrix and corroborative medical evidence, dismissing the appeal despite delay in FIR and defence of false implication.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rape prosecutrix testimony uncorroborated evidence delay in FIR

Javed @ Bhura v. The State (NCT of Delhi)

22 Feb 2013 · S.P. Garg · 2013:DHC:1003

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for armed robbery based on credible eyewitness and medical evidence despite delay in arrest and absence of recovery from the accused.

criminal appeal_dismissed robbery Sections 394, 397, 34 IPC disclosure statement eyewitness testimony

Delhi Development Authority v. Santosh Kumari Khanna

22 Feb 2013 · The Chief Justice; V. K. Jain · 2013:DHC:1011-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the DDA must send allotment letters to all known addresses if the primary address communication fails and fixed the cost payable by the allottee as per rates at the time of writ petition filing, setting aside cancellation of allotment due to nonpayment.

property appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Development Authority New Pattern Registration Scheme 1979 MIG flat allotment demand-cum-allotment letter

East Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Sattar Sheikh & Ors.

22 Feb 2013 · THE CHIEF JUSTICE; V.K. JAIN · 2013:DHC:1012-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld compensation awarded against the Municipal Corporation for death caused by an uncovered manhole, applying res ipsa loquitur and affirming writ jurisdiction to award damages for breach of public duty.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant res ipsa loquitur public duty compensation uncovered manhole

Narayan Singh v. Sanjeev Kumar & Ors.

22 Feb 2013 · G. P. Mittal · 2013:DHC:1010

The Delhi High Court held that amendment deleting some complainants in a Section 138 NI Act complaint is permissible and dismissed the petition seeking quashing of the complaint on that ground.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 482 CrPC amendment of complainants dishonour of cheque

Rakesh @ Raku v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

22 Feb 2013 · G. P. Mittal · 2013:DHC:1009

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction for rape, holding that the prosecutrix's credible testimony and corroborative evidence established guilt beyond reasonable doubt, rejecting the appellant's claim of consensual intercourse and false implication.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rape consent prosecutrix testimony sexual intercourse

Anil Kochhar v. The D.S.I.I.DC

22 Feb 2013 · Manmohan Singh · DHC:1013
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a party’s right to appoint an arbitrator under Section 11(6) is forfeited upon filing of a Section 11 petition, and appointed a sole arbitrator after invalidating the respondent’s belated appointment.

other petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) appointment of arbitrator forfeiture of right

Pradeep Khatri v. State NCT of Delhi

22 Feb 2013 · Sunil Gaur · 2013:DHC:1014

Bail was denied to the accused in a murder trial at the stage of leading defense evidence due to the gravity of the offense and risk of tampering, as defense evidence can be led while in custody.

criminal petition_dismissed bail murder trial Section 302 IPC defense evidence

Shri Varinder Sahni v. Pratap K. Kaula and Others

22 Feb 2013 · Manmohan J · 2013:DHC:1002

The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for specific performance as infructuous following a prior Division Bench judgment upholding a decree in favor of defendants, emphasizing that no two decrees can coexist for the same property and cause of action.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance bona fide purchaser infructuous suit Section 151 CPC

RBI AND ANR v. RAMESH SINGH AND ANR

22 Feb 2013 · THE CHIEF JUSTICE; V.K. JAIN · 2013:DHC:1006-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a writ Court can correct an arbitrary denial of marks for a correct answer in a departmental exam, awarding promotion prospectively but denying retrospective benefits due to delay.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant writ jurisdiction examination evaluation arbitrariness reasonable person test

Shivani Sharma v. Ram Chander and Ors.

22 Feb 2013 · J.R. Midha · 2013:DHC:1007

The Delhi High Court upheld its power under Section 165 of the Indian Evidence Act to actively elicit truth and allowed enhancement of compensation in a motor accident injury claim considering the appellant's permanent disability and losses.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 165 Indian Evidence Act Compensation enhancement Motor accident claim Permanent disability

Real Lifestyle Broadcasting Pvt. Ltd. v. Turner Asia Pacific Ventures Inc.

22 Feb 2013 · S. Muralidhar · 2013:DHC:996

The Delhi High Court held that it cannot modify a sanctioned Scheme of Arrangement to impose new obligations not agreed upon, dismissing RLB's application seeking transfer of encryption keys and restoration of the distribution network.

corporate petition_dismissed Significant Scheme of Arrangement Companies Act 1956 Section 392 modification of scheme

Babita Pathak & Others v. High Court of Delhi

22 Feb 2013 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; V.K. Jain · 2013:DHC:997-DB

The Delhi High Court held that carry-forward of reserved vacancies for physically handicapped persons under Section 36 of the Persons with Disabilities Act is directory, does not create rights for General category candidates, and appointments beyond advertised vacancies are impermissible, dismissing the writ petitions challenging the reservation scheme.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Persons with Disabilities Act 1995 Section 36 reservation carry-forward vacancies

Dharam Raj v. The Chairman Cum-MD, D.T.C. and Ors.

22 Feb 2013 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Veena Birbal · 2013:DHC:999-DB

The Delhi High Court held that an employee suspended for technical lapses caused by wrongful assignment of duties is entitled to full salary and service benefits for the suspension period despite a penalty of censure.

labor petition_allowed Significant suspension period subsistence allowance technical lapses service benefits

R N Malhotra v. Dhanesh Kumar Jain & Ors.

21 Feb 2013 · G. P. Mittal · 2013:DHC:336

The High Court of Delhi dismissed the petition in CRL.M.C. 2787/2010 by referring to the judgment in a related case, without elaborating further.

criminal petition_dismissed Procedural petition dismissal criminal miscellaneous case High Court of Delhi reference to related judgment

Mukesh Gupta & Ors. v. Daljeet Singh Uberoi

21 Feb 2013 · S. P. Garg · 2013:DHC:963

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Section 447 IPC for lack of prima facie evidence and abuse of process where disputed ownership and possession of an industrial plot were involved.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. Section 447 IPC quashing of criminal proceedings partnership firm