Delhi High Court

103,150 judgments

Year:

Subhash v. State (NCT) of Delhi

21 Feb 2013 · S.P. Garg · 2013:DHC:961
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction for robbery based on prompt identification and recovery despite absence of Test Identification Parade, modifying only the fine imposed.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant robbery identification Test Identification Parade prompt FIR

Rajbir Khatri v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

21 Feb 2013 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Veena Birbal · 2013:DHC:962-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the CAT’s dismissal of a driver recruitment claim, directing fresh consideration of the petitioner’s eligibility based on possession of a valid Heavy Motor Vehicle licence.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant eligibility criteria Heavy Motor Vehicle licence Delhi Transport Corporation Central Administrative Tribunal

Jitender v. State

21 Feb 2013 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Pratibha Rani · 2013:DHC:964-DB

R N Malhotra v. Bhupesh Kumar Jain & Ors.

21 Feb 2013 · G. P. Mittal · 2013:DHC:971

The High Court of Delhi dismissed petition CRL.M.C. 2786/2010 filed by R N Malhotra in terms of the judgment passed in a related petition CRL.M.C. 2782/2010.

other petition_dismissed Procedural petition dismissal CRL.M.C. 2786/2010 CRL.M.C. 2782/2010 High Court of Delhi

R N Malhotra v. Surender Kumar Jain & Ors.

21 Feb 2013 · G. P. Mittal · 2013:DHC:975

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition CRL.M.C. 2785/2010 by referring to its contemporaneous judgment in a related case, without elaborating on the merits.

criminal petition_dismissed Procedural petition dismissal criminal miscellaneous case Delhi High Court reference to related judgment

R N Malhotra v. Surender Kumar Jain & Ors.

21 Feb 2013 · G. P. Mittal · 2013:DHC:977

The High Court of Delhi dismissed the petition CRL.M.C. 2783/2010 filed by R N Malhotra in terms of the judgment passed in the connected petition CRL.M.C. 2782/2010.

criminal petition_dismissed Procedural petition dismissal connected case criminal miscellaneous case High Court of Delhi

R N Malhotra v. Bhupesh Kumar Jain & Ors.

21 Feb 2013 · G. P. Mittal · 2013:DHC:972

The Delhi High Court held that a Company Law Board order cancelling cheques does not absolve liability under Section 138 NI Act, and winding up proceedings do not bar criminal complaints without Company Court permission.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Company Law Board order Cheque dishonor Winding up proceedings

Tata Motors Limited v. JSC VTB Bank

21 Feb 2013 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Veena Birbal · 2013:DHC:957-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a foreign corporation with its sole office in India can be sued at that office under Section 20 CPC, clarifying that branches are not separate juristic entities for jurisdictional purposes and allowing clarificatory amendments to the plaint.

civil appeal_allowed Significant territorial jurisdiction Section 20 CPC foreign corporation juristic entity

Tata Motors Limited v. JSC VTB Bank

21 Feb 2013 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Veena Birbal · 2013:DHC:958-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a foreign corporation with a sole office in India can be sued at that office under Section 20(a) CPC, allowing amendment of the plaint to clarify defendant's identity and restoring suits dismissed for lack of territorial jurisdiction.

civil appeal_allowed Significant territorial jurisdiction Section 20 CPC foreign corporation sole office

Tata Motors Limited v. JSC VTB Bank

21 Feb 2013 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Veena Birbal · 2013:DHC:959-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a foreign corporation carrying on business through its sole office in India can be sued there, allowing clarificatory amendments to the plaint and restoring suits dismissed for lack of territorial jurisdiction.

civil appeal_allowed Significant territorial jurisdiction Section 20 CPC foreign bank sole office

Indus Towers Limited v. Unitech Wireless (Tamil Nadu) Pvt. Ltd. and Anr

21 Feb 2013 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Veena Birbal · 2013:DHC:960-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to modify the interim order by mandating an escrow deposit as security for exit compensation claims in a telecom infrastructure asset transfer dispute, emphasizing assignability of contractual obligations and encouraging settlement.

commercial appeal_allowed Significant assignability exit compensation telecom infrastructure passive infrastructure

Shubit Education Society v. Govt. of NCT

21 Feb 2013 · The Chief Justice; V. K. Jain · 2013:DHC:955-DB

The Delhi High Court held that an Essentiality Certificate limits school establishment to the specified location, and land allotment inconsistent with it is invalid, dismissing the appellant's claim for allotment in a different locality.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Essentiality Certificate Delhi Development Authority land allotment Delhi School Education Rules

Mohdirfan v. State

21 Feb 2013 · Sunil Gaur · 2013:DHC:6622

The Delhi High Court held that an earlier order exempting a guest house from licence requirements is not binding if passed without considering relevant regulations, and dismissed the petition challenging prosecution for running the guest house without a licence.

criminal appeal_dismissed res judicata licence guest house Delhi Police Act

R N Malhotra v. Dhanesh Kumar Jain & Ors.

21 Feb 2013 · G. P. Mittal · 2013:DHC:6864

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition Crl.M.C. 2787/2010 filed by R.N. Malhotra by referring to the judgment in a related petition decided on the same day.

criminal petition_dismissed petition dismissal criminal miscellaneous case Delhi High Court R.N. Malhotra

850c33cad9e8941b16dda8e08aebff3f0616743762884dbf970220d1247ca6d5

21 Feb 2013 · 2013:DHC:7265

The High Court dismissed a batch of writ petitions for non-prosecution due to non-filing of written submissions and absence of petitioners at the hearing.

administrative petition_dismissed writ petitions non-prosecution dismissal written submissions

Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi-VM v. REI Infra

21 Feb 2013 · Badar Durrani Ahmed; R. V. Easwar · 2013:DHC:7844-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the revenue's appeals challenging the remand of issues on higher depreciation, interest-free loans, and Rule 8D applicability to the Assessing Officer, affirming the Tribunal's directions and existing precedents.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 14A Rule 8D higher depreciation

Parnika Commercial & Estate (P) Ltd v. Govt of NCT

21 Feb 2013 · Manmoihan Singh · 2013:DHC:8059

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to raise additional claims before the appointed arbitrator and directed the arbitrator to consider all claims in accordance with law under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) appointment of arbitrator additional claims

R N Malhotra v. Dhanesh Kumar Jain & Ors.

21 Feb 2013 · G. P. Mittal · 2013:DHC:974

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition in CRL.M.C. 2789/2010 in terms of the judgment passed in a connected case CRL.M.C. 2782/2010.

criminal petition_dismissed Procedural petition dismissal criminal miscellaneous case connected judgment Delhi High Court

Anil Dass & Ors. v. Babulal Gupta & Ors.

21 Feb 2013 · Suresh Kait · 2013:DHC:8494

The High Court dismissed the appeal for default and non-prosecution due to the appellants' failure to appear and pursue the appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed appeal dismissal for default non-prosecution non-appearance

R N Malhotra v. Dhanesh Kumar Jain & Ors.

21 Feb 2013 · G. P. Mittal · 2013:DHC:973

The High Court of Delhi dismissed petition CRL.M.C. 2788/2010 by referring to its concurrent judgment in CRL.M.C. 2782/2010.

criminal petition_dismissed Procedural petition dismissal criminal miscellaneous case High Court of Delhi reference to related judgment