Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Ajay @ Ganga Ram v. State

16 Dec 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:11463

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for kidnapping and sexually assaulting a child under the POCSO Act, affirming the statutory presumption and rejecting the appellant's alibi and false implication plea.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant kidnapping sexual assault POCSO Act statutory presumption

Nasir v. State NCT of Delhi

16 Dec 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:11429
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a murder case based on circumstantial evidence, emphasizing the right to liberty and speedy trial under Article 21 despite the seriousness of the offence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail circumstantial evidence Article 21 right to speedy trial

Ankush @ Dal Chand v. State NCT of Delhi

16 Dec 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:11426
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in serious sexual offence and domestic violence cases due to prolonged trial delay, emphasizing the right to a speedy trial under Article 21 with conditions to protect the victim and witnesses.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail prolonged incarceration speedy trial Article 21

Yogesh Kumar & Ors. v. The State (N.C.T of Delhi)

16 Dec 2025 · Sanjeev Narula · 2025:DHC:11455
Cites 2 · Cited by 1

The High Court upheld the dowry death and cruelty convictions against the husband but acquitted the in-laws due to insufficient evidence of dowry-related cruelty soon before the deceased's suicide.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dowry death Section 304B IPC Section 498A IPC Section 113B Evidence Act

Ranjana Rajagopalan v. Lt. Governor of Delhi & Ors.

16 Dec 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:11386-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court held that a co-operative housing society member may nominate a single non-blood relative as nominee, reading down Rule 91 and Form 17 to conform with Section 78 of the Act, while upholding blood relation restriction for joint nominations as constitutionally valid.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 2003 Rule 91 Form 17 Nomination

Ranjana Arora v. Devender Kumar Legal Heirs & Ors.

16 Dec 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:11406

The court dismissed the petition seeking to file additional documents at the final stage of a long-pending suit due to lack of sufficient cause and to prevent reopening of evidence and delay.

civil petition_dismissed Order VII Rule 14 CPC additional documents final arguments delay in filing documents

Farhad Suri v. Praveen Choudhary

16 Dec 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:11418

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal complaints under Section 138 NI Act against company directors for cheques dishonoured due to statutory moratorium during insolvency proceedings, holding that such cheques were not validly issued and no offence was made out.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 Moratorium

Md. Aniqul Islam v. Directorate of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence, Delhi

16 Dec 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:11427

The Delhi High Court held that summons issued under Section 70 CGST Act for inquiry are valid procedural steps and dismissed writ petitions challenging them as premature.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Section 70 CGST Act summons GST investigation search and seizure tax summons validity

Anandam Minerals Private Limited v. Union of India

16 Dec 2025 · Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2025:DHC:11403-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the preferred bidder declaration in a mineral block auction, relying on expert reports that found no server-side technical glitch and emphasizing limited judicial interference in tender processes absent mala fide or arbitrariness.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant e-auction technical glitch expert committee judicial review

M/S RAMACIVIL INDIA CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD v. UNION OF INDIA

16 Dec 2025 · Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya, C.J.; Tushar Rao Gedela, J. · 2025:DHC:11387-DB

Appeals against enforcement orders of arbitral awards are maintainable under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 only if the orders are enumerated in Order XLIII CPC; otherwise, such appeals are not maintainable and are dismissed.

commercial appeal_dismissed Significant Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Section 13 Delhi High Court Act, 1966 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

National Insurance Company Limited v. Ombeer & Anr

16 Dec 2025 · Chandrasekharan Sudha · 2025:DHC:11372
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court allowed the insurer’s appeal and set aside the compensation award due to lack of credible evidence and failure to prove the accident and disability despite condonation of delay.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923 compensation claim delay in filing claim disability certificate

Sense Accu Tras Infra Jubi Alliance Pvt Ltd v. Neelam Rawat & Ors

16 Dec 2025 · Chandrasekharan Sudha · 2025:DHC:11402

The Delhi High Court upheld compensation liability under the Employee’s Compensation Act for death by heart attack caused by work-related stress, dismissing the employer’s appeal challenging causal connection.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Employee’s Compensation Act work-related stress heart attack causal connection

Chandra Abhishek Raj Srivastava v. Dr. Akshay Mehra and Ors

16 Dec 2025 · Chandrasekharan Sudha · 2025:DHC:11401

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal seeking to set aside an ex-parte eviction decree and condone delay, holding that judicial custody does not excuse non-appearance or liability for mesne profits without sufficient cause.

civil appeal_dismissed ex-parte decree condonation of delay judicial custody mesne profits

Anupma Mitra v. Amit Mitra through LR Prerna Seemar Kalra

16 Dec 2025 · Chandrasekharan Sudha · 2025:DHC:11400

The Delhi High Court held that substitution of a legal representative in a civil suit cannot be allowed solely on a registered Will without an enquiry into its genuineness as mandated under Order XXII Rule 5 CPC.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XXII Rule 5 CPC legal representative substitution registered Will

Chaman Lal v. Manish Kumar & Ors.

16 Dec 2025 · Saurabh Banerjee · 2025:DHC:11408

The Delhi High Court upheld dismissal of an eviction petition due to the landlord's failure to prove ownership and landlord-tenant relationship amid discrepancies in ownership documents and identity.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 eviction petition landlord-tenant relationship ownership documents

HAV / GD VIKKY NO. 115261259 v. Union of India

16 Dec 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:11506-DB

The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging departmental proceedings as infructuous after the petitioner was medically invalidated out of service.

administrative petition_dismissed departmental proceedings medical invalidation service termination writ petition

Daya Nand v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

16 Dec 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:11510

The Delhi High Court upheld the framing of charges for rape and related offences where the accused allegedly deceived the prosecutrix by falsely promising marriage, holding that a prima facie case existed warranting trial.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant framing of charges prima facie case Section 376 IPC deception

Afzal Hussain v. Sana Khan

16 Dec 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:11428

The Delhi High Court upheld the grant of interim maintenance to the wife under the DV Act, refusing to interfere with concurrent findings of subordinate courts despite the husband's claim of unemployment.

family petition_dismissed interim maintenance Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 revisional jurisdiction Section 438 BNSS

Sh Krishan Kumar Sharma v. Sh Naresh Kumar Sharma & Ors.

16 Dec 2025 · Subramonium Prasad · 2025:DHC:11547

The Delhi High Court granted a preliminary decree of partition based on clear admissions by defendants under Order XII Rule 6 CPC, rejecting vague claims of severance without evidence.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XII Rule 6 CPC judgment on admissions partition suit preliminary decree

S. K. Shah v. Union of India

16 Dec 2025 · Dinesh Mehta; Vimal Kumar Yadav · 2025:DHC:11480-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a penalty order set aside after the relevant period cannot be used to deny Non-Functional Selection Grade benefits and quashed the denial communication, directing grant of benefits with arrears.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Non-Functional Selection Grade NFSG penalty order administrative decision