Delhi High Court

101,979 judgments

Year:

Karan Singh @ Deva v. State

07 Mar 2013 · S.P. Garg · 2013:DHC:1250

The Delhi High Court upheld conviction for robbery under Sections 120-B and 392 IPC based on reliable witness identification but set aside conviction under Section 397 IPC due to lack of evidence of use of deadly weapon, reducing the sentence accordingly.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant robbery identification parade adverse inference Section 397 IPC

Deepak Kumar v. State (Delhi)

07 Mar 2013 · S.P. Garg · 2013:DHC:1251
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Deepak Kumar for attempted murder based on reliable injured witness testimony and adverse inference from refusal to participate in Test Identification Parade.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant injured witness testimony test identification parade Section 34 IPC common intention

Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board v. Lokesh Kumar and Ors.

07 Mar 2013 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Rani · 2013:DHC:1249-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the Selection Board must forward the next eligible candidate's name for appointment after disqualifying an ineligible candidate, and the decision to fill vacancies rests with the user department, dismissing the Board's writ petition.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Selection Board Reservation OBC candidate Ineligibility

Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board v. Hariom Ahlawat & Ors.

07 Mar 2013 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Rani · 2013:DHC:1265-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision directing DSSSB to fill vacancies by eligible candidates beyond the initially notified select list, emphasizing merit, age criteria, and consistent application of reservation rules.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board reservation merit list waitlist

Bhagirath v. State of NCT of Delhi

07 Mar 2013 · G. P. Mittal · 2013:DHC:1248

The High Court of Delhi dismissed the criminal appeal of Bhagirath by applying the precedent set in Rajender Yadav v. State of NCT of Delhi.

criminal appeal_dismissed criminal appeal dismissal precedent High Court of Delhi

Rajender Yadav v. State of NCT of Delhi; Bhagirath v. State of NCT of Delhi

07 Mar 2013 · G. P. Mittal · 2013:DHC:1253
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for robbery under Section 397 IPC, ruling that any knife used to cause terror qualifies as a deadly weapon and that identification and recovery evidence sufficiently proved the appellants' guilt.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant robbery deadly weapon knife Section 397 IPC

Ram Singh & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi

07 Mar 2013 · G. P. Mittal · 2013:DHC:1247
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a video interview of a rape complainant is not illegal under Section 327(3) CrPC and can be used to confront the witness, setting aside the trial court's order rejecting its use.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 327 CrPC in-camera trial rape trial video interview admissibility

Ram Kishore Sharma v. State

07 Mar 2013 · Manmohan · 2013:DHC:1260

The Delhi High Court granted Letters of Administration to the petitioner as the sole Class-II heir of an intestate deceased, subject to procedural compliance.

civil petition_allowed Letters of Administration Indian Succession Act Intestate succession Class-I heirs

Om Prakash v. Delhi Development Authority

07 Mar 2013 · The Chief Justice; V. K. Jain · 2013:DHC:1278-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld DDA's revised land allotment rates and allowed a limited extension for payment with interest, dismissing appellants' claims for lower rates and interest waiver on larger plots.

property appeal_dismissed land allotment Delhi Development Authority plot size land premium

CIT DELHI-IV v. HUGHES COMMUNICATION INDIA LTD

07 Mar 2013 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; R.V. Easwar · 2013:DHC:1252-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's deletion of income tax additions relating to stock impairment and sales tax adjustments, affirming the accepted accounting principle of valuing stock at the lower of cost or net realizable value.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 260A valuation of stock net realizable value

Om Prakash v. Delhi Development Authority

07 Mar 2013 · Chief Justice; V. K. Jain · 2013:DHC:1284-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed appeals by granting appellants time to pay the balance premium with interest for 300 sq. meter plots allotted by DDA and directed consideration of NOC requests for mortgage.

property appeal_allowed land allotment Delhi Development Authority plot size land premium

Om Prakash v. Delhi Development Authority

07 Mar 2013 · The Chief Justice; V. K. Jain · 2013:DHC:1283-DB

The Delhi High Court held that appellants must pay the revised land premium with interest for larger plots allotted by DDA and dismissed their claims for allotment at earlier lower rates, granting limited extension for payment and directions on NOC issuance.

property appeal_dismissed Delhi Development Authority plot allotment land premium interest on delayed payment

Om Prakash v. Delhi Development Authority

07 Mar 2013 · Chief Justice; V. K. Jain · 2013:DHC:1282-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed appeals granting limited time to pay revised land premium with interest for plots allotted by DDA, rejecting claims for lower rates and directing consideration of mortgage NOC applications.

property appeal_allowed Significant land allotment Delhi Development Authority plot size land premium

Om Prakash v. Delhi Development Authority

07 Mar 2013 · Chief Justice; V. K. Jain · 2013:DHC:1281-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld DDA's revised plot allotment rates and interest charges, granting appellants limited time to pay dues and directing consideration of mortgage NOC requests.

property appeal_dismissed Delhi Development Authority plot allotment land premium extension of time

Om Prakash v. Delhi Development Authority

07 Mar 2013 · Chief Justice; V. K. Jain · 2013:DHC:1280-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed appellants three months to pay revised land premium with interest for 300 sq. meter plots allotted by DDA, rejecting claims for lower rates and directing consideration of mortgage NOC requests.

property appeal_allowed Delhi Development Authority plot allotment land premium interest on delayed payment

Om Prakash v. Delhi Development Authority

07 Mar 2013 · The Chief Justice; V. K. Jain · 2013:DHC:1279-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld DDA's revised land rates and interest charges for allotment of 300 sq. meter plots, granting appellants limited time to pay and directing consideration of mortgage requests as per policy.

property appeal_dismissed Delhi Development Authority plot allotment land premium interest on delayed payment

Om Prakash v. Delhi Development Authority

07 Mar 2013 · The Chief Justice; V. K. Jain · 2013:DHC:1276-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed appeals by granting time to pay revised land premium with interest for larger plots allotted by DDA, rejecting claims for allotment at earlier lower rates or waiver of interest.

property appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Development Authority plot allotment land premium interest on delayed payment

Upendernath Bhardwaj v. Yogender Nath Bhardwaj & Ors.

07 Mar 2013 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Indermeet Kaur · 2013:DHC:7999-DB

The High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn on the appellant's request, advising amendment of the plaint for better case establishment, without commenting on merits.

civil appeal_dismissed Order 1 Rule 2 CPC amendment of plaint withdrawal of appeal legal heirs

M/S RELIANCE CAPITAL LTD v. RAJ GANGWANI & ORS

07 Mar 2013 · Manmohan Singh · 2013:DHC:7995

The Delhi High Court allowed the decree-holder to withdraw execution petitions after partial payment and loan revival, vacating the attachment order.

civil appeal_allowed execution petition loan revival partial payment attachment order

Mohd. Parviz Sonij v. Respondent

07 Mar 2013 · G. S. Sistani · 2013:DHC:7169

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking compensation for electrocution injuries, holding that disputed factual issues preclude adjudication under Article 226 and such claims must be pursued in appropriate civil proceedings.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Article 226 writ petition compensation electrocution