M/S RELIANCE CAPITAL LTD v. RAJ GANGWANI & ORS

Delhi High Court · 07 Mar 2013 · 2013:DHC:7995
Manmohan Singh
EX.P. 376/2012 & E.A.938/2012
2013:DHC:7995
civil appeal_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed the decree-holder to withdraw execution petitions after partial payment and loan revival, vacating the attachment order.

Full Text
Translation output
$-13 & 14 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
EX.P. 376/2012 & E.A.938/2012
M/S RELIANCE CAPITAL LTD Decree Holder
Through Ms.Priya Darshini Arora, Adv. along with Mr.Sonmath Pandey, AR
VERSUS
RAJ GANGWANI & ORS
Through
JUDGMENT
Debtors Mr.Gajinder Kumar, Adv. with
Mr.Chandra Shekhar, Adv. along with JD-3 in person.
EX.P. 379/2012 & E.A.939/2012
M/S RELIANCE CAPITAL LTD Decree Holder
Through Ms.Priya Darshini Arora, Adv. along with Mr.Somnath Pandey, AR
versus
RAJ GANGWANI & ORS
Through
Judgment Debtors Mr.Gajinder Kumar, Adv. with
Mr.Chandra Shekhar, Adv. along with JD-3 in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH
ORDER
07.03.2013 In terms of the last order, the judgment-debtors have paid the sum of
^40 lac to the decree-holder. As agreed between the parties, the loan in question has been revived. Learned counsel for the decree-holder states that
2013:DHC:7995 his client will give the details ofrescheduled terms to the judgment-debtors within one week so that the balance amount will be paid by the judgment- debtors.
In view of the above, leamed counsel for the decree-holder wishes to withdraw the present execution petitions. As prayed, the same are dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. The attachment order as passed on 4"' December, 2012 stands vacated.
MANMOHANSINGH,^ ^ MARCH 07, 2013 2013:DHC:7995