Delhi High Court
101,979 judgments
Om Prakash v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court upheld DDA's revised land rates for larger plots, granted a limited payment extension with interest, and directed DDA to consider mortgage NOC requests as per policy.
Om Prakash v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court allowed appellants three months to pay revised land premium with interest for larger plots allotted by DDA, rejecting claims for earlier lower rates and directing consideration of mortgage permissions.
Om Prakash v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court held that appellants are not entitled to earlier lower rates for larger plots never offered at such rates and must pay revised premium with interest within a stipulated time, allowing limited extension and consideration of mortgage permissions.
Om Prakash v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court allowed appeals granting appellants time to pay revised premium with interest for larger plots allotted by DDA, rejecting claims for earlier lower rates and directing consideration of mortgage permissions.
Om Prakash v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court upheld DDA's revised land rates for larger plots, denied allotment at earlier lower rates, and granted limited extension for payment with interest and consideration of NOC requests.
Om Prakash v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court upheld DDA's allotment of 300 sq. meter plots at revised rates with interest, granting appellants limited time to pay and directing consideration of mortgage-related NOCs.
AKS PROPERTIES LTD AND ORS v. M.B.R. AASTHA BHAGWATI EDUCATIONAL TRUST AND ORS
The Delhi High Court decreed recovery of a loan secured by land based on the defendants' admission, permitting sale of the secured property to satisfy the debt.
New India Assurance Co Ltd v. Dayal Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's award, holding that police records and investigation reports suffice to prove negligence under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act without mandatory eyewitness testimony.
Som Dutt v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that failure to indicate post preference in a recruitment application does not justify rejection of a meritorious candidate, directing his appointment in violation of arbitrary selection procedures.
Neera Mehta v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail, holding that mere disputes over dowry valuation do not justify bail cancellation absent cogent evidence of abuse or interference with justice.
Subhash Chandra v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 306 IPC for abetment of suicide, holding that continuous cruelty and harassment by the husband, even without his presence at the time of suicide, can constitute abetment.
Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi v. Delhi Apartments Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's deletion of additions treating advance receipt as non-taxable in the year received and confirmed gains from sale of land held as fixed asset as capital gains, dismissing the revenue's appeal.
Mansa Ram v. Sudhir Krishna Secy Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition against DDA and others for alleged non-compliance of possession-related orders, emphasizing conditionality of injunctions on certified revenue records and the cautious exercise of contempt jurisdiction.
UP STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION v. SEENA @SEEMA
The Delhi High Court modified the interest rate on compensation awarded against the UP State Road Transport Corporation from 18% to 12% per annum due to the Corporation's negligent conduct during litigation, while upholding litigation costs imposed by the Tribunal.
Ram Bachan v. Mahavir Parshad Sharma & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant's appeal by enforcing a Lok Adalat settlement enhancing compensation to Rs.4,75,000 with directions for timely payment and interest on delay.
Dharmender Kumar Pal v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for murder and robbery based on a complete chain of circumstantial evidence including last seen theory, recovery of stolen cash, and forensic proof linking the weapon to the crime.
Udai Shankar Kumar v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for raping an eight-year-old girl, holding that the prosecutrix's credible testimony and satisfactory explanation for delay in FIR outweighed defence claims of false implication and investigation irregularities.
Lakhi Ram @ Kacha v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal holding the appellant to be a juvenile at the time of offence and ordered his immediate release, deeming the sentence under IPC and Arms Act ineffective under the Juvenile Justice Act.
M/S SPR SALES PVT.LTD v. M/S OJAS INDUSTRIES PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court held that a summary suit under Order 37 CPC can be based on invoices constituting a written contract and granted conditional leave to defend upon deposit of the principal amount, rejecting the defendant's claim for liquidated damages due to acceptance of delayed supplies without notice.
Grasim Industries Ltd. v. The Secy., Deptt. of Science & Technology, Govt. of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner was entitled to certificates under section 32A(2B)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for using government-developed technology in manufacturing caustic soda, allowing a higher investment allowance.