Delhi High Court

98,981 judgments

Year:

Sanjeev Sharma v. The State

11 Sep 2012 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:475
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Delhi High Court allowed the transfer of a criminal case from Saket Court to Patiala House Courts based on territorial jurisdiction as per government notification.

criminal appeal_allowed transfer petition territorial jurisdiction Patiala House Courts Munirka

F.HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE LTD & ANR v. CIPLA LTD

07 Sep 2012 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:9674-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld Roche's patent validity for Erlotinib Hydrochloride but held Cipla's polymorph B product did not infringe, clarifying inventive step and Section 3(d) standards under Indian patent law.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Inventive step Section 3(d) Patents Act Patent infringement Polymorphs

F.HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE LTD & ANR v. CIPLA LTD

07 Sep 2012 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:9677-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld Roche's patent validity but held Cipla's polymorph B product does not infringe, clarifying inventive step and Section 3(d) standards in pharmaceutical patents.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Inventive step Section 3(d) Patent infringement Polymorphs

Cadbury India Ltd v. Varsha Trading Corporation & Anr

31 Aug 2012 · Manmohan · 2013:DHC:7506

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and restored a complaint dismissed for non-prosecution due to non-service of default notice and genuine misunderstanding of hearing dates under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act default notice non-prosecution dismissal of complaint

Amit Kumar v. Union of India and Ors

30 Aug 2012 · C. Hari Shankar; Amit Sharma · 2024:DHC:9041-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 8

The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition and directed appointment of the petitioner after forensic examination confirmed his thumb impressions matched, overruling earlier rejection based on handwriting mismatch.

administrative petition_allowed Significant forensic expert report handwriting mismatch thumb impression natural justice

Himani Malhotra v. Indraprastha College for Women and Anr

21 Aug 2012 · Anu Malhotra · 2017:DHC:3762

The Delhi High Court held that a suspended teacher cannot be arbitrarily denied permission to attend UGC Orientation and Refresher courses and directed the college to issue the necessary No Objection Certificate and attest application forms.

administrative petition_allowed Significant suspension No Objection Certificate Orientation Programme Refresher Course

Satinder Mahendru v. New Delhi Municipal Council

17 Aug 2012 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2014:DHC:293

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner’s claim for alternate premises, holding that an unauthorized occupant without a valid license cannot claim parity with license holders evicted for public purposes under Article 14.

administrative petition_dismissed unauthorized occupant alternate accommodation Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 Article 14

Kalpana & Anr v. Shiam Beharilal Sharma & Ors

13 Aug 2012 · Manmohan Singh J. · 2013:DHC:7596

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's refusal to allow a late-stage amendment of the written statement based on a suspicious document, dismissing the petition for delay and lack of due diligence.

civil petition_dismissed Order 6 Rule 17 CPC Amendment of pleadings Delay in litigation Article 227 Constitution of India

Chief Secretary, Govt. of NCT of Delhi v. Satish Kumar & Ors.

09 Aug 2012 · Pradeep Nandrajog; V. Kameswar Rao · 2013:DHC:5628-DB

The Delhi High Court held that contract appointed Craft Instructors are entitled to basic pay plus certain allowances but not increments or leave benefits, directed application of last come first go principle in future disengagements, and required the Government to consider applicability of the Maternity Benefits Act.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant contract employees Craft Instructors last come first go allowances

Chief Secretary, Govt. of NCT of Delhi v. Satish Kumar & Ors.

09 Aug 2012 · Pradeep Nandrajog; V. Kameswar Rao · 2013:DHC:5629-DB

The Delhi High Court held that contract-appointed Craft Instructors are entitled to basic pay, grade pay, DA, HRA, and transport allowance but not full leave benefits, and directed application of the 'last come first go' principle in future terminations.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant contract employees Craft Instructors allowances last come first go

Union of India v. Anand Mohan Sharan

26 Jul 2012 · C. Hari Shankar; Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:7900-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 22

The Delhi High Court held that the Disciplinary Authority's order remitting a disciplinary matter for fresh inquiry without proper reasons and in violation of procedural rules was unsustainable and set aside the order.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant All India Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1969 Disciplinary Authority Inquiry Officer Central Vigilance Commission

Devender v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi; Pappu Ram Meena v. Commissioner of Police

23 Jul 2012 · Pradeep Nandrajog; V. Kameswar Rao · 2013:DHC:2490-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that acquittal circumstances must be carefully examined before denying public employment, quashing mechanical rejection of a police constable candidate despite his honourable acquittal.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant public employment criminal antecedents acquittal false implication

Devender v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi through the Commissioner of Police & Anr.

23 Jul 2012 · Pradeep Nandrajog; V. Kameswar Rao · 2013:DHC:2491-DB

The Delhi High Court held that denial of public employment solely on the basis of criminal charges or acquittal without examining the nature of offence and manner of acquittal is impermissible, directing reinstatement of a falsely implicated candidate and proper reconsideration of another's case.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant public employment criminal antecedents acquittal moral turpitude

Hindustan Zinc Ltd v. Durha Construction Pvt Ltd

17 Jul 2012 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2021:DHC:697

The Delhi High Court upheld striking off the appellant's defence for wilful non-compliance with a discovery order under Order 11 Rule 12 CPC, emphasizing the obligation to produce relevant documents and the consequences of contumacious conduct.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant discovery order Order 11 Rule 12 CPC Order 11 Rule 21 CPC striking off defence

Mr.M.L.Yadav, Advocate v. STATE .....

06 Jul 2012 · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG; HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE M... · 2014:DHC:6269-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Janardhan Gupta for attempted rape of his mentally disabled sister-in-law, holding that credible eyewitness testimony and circumstances established the offence despite absence of medical injuries.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant attempted rape medical evidence mental disability credibility of witness

Mr.M.L.Yadav, Advocate v. STATE .....

06 Jul 2012 · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG; HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE M... · 2014:DHC:6268-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Janardhan Gupta for attempted rape of a mentally disabled minor, affirming that credible witness testimony and circumstantial evidence suffice to prove the offence despite absence of physical injuries or semen.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant attempted rape medical examination mental disability forensic evidence

M/S. KUSUM SAHNI PVT. LTD. v. NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.

28 May 2012 · M.L. Mehta · 2013:DHC:2818

The Delhi High Court held that breach of policy conditions was waived by insurer's conduct, limitation runs from repudiation, and allowed partial recovery based on joint surveyors' loss assessment in a fire insurance claim dispute.

civil appeal_allowed Significant insurance policy breach limitation period arbitration clause loss assessment

Cpl Gaurav Badhwar v. Union of India & Ors.

18 May 2012 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Rani · 2015:DHC:1454-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that denial of discharge on grounds of trade criticality is arbitrary when objective evidence shows the trade is redundant and personnel are assigned non-technical duties, directing the Air Force to grant discharge to Cpl. Gaurav Badhwar.

service_law petition_allowed Significant criticality of trade discharge from armed forces instrument fitter trade modernization of armed forces

S. L. Saini v. Gyanender Bharti & Ors.

17 May 2012 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:2261

The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition against the Delhi Jal Board and GNCTD, holding that no wilful disobedience occurred as the land acquisition process under the 2013 LA Act is underway in accordance with law.

administrative petition_dismissed contempt of court land acquisition Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 wilful disobedience

Krishna Kumari v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

09 May 2012 · Pradeep Nandrajog; V. Kameswar Rao · 2013:DHC:6337-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a senior teacher entitled to retrospective appointment and pay fixation must have her pay stepped up to match juniors receiving ACP/MACP benefits, setting aside the tribunal’s denial and cost imposition.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Assured Career Progression Scheme Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme pay anomaly seniority