Delhi High Court

98,981 judgments

Year:

C&C Constructions Ltd. v. IL&FS Trust Company Limited & Ors.

24 Dec 2012 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Yogesh Khanna · 2017:DHC:396-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a sole arbitrator appointment by party consent, confirmed service on promoter group heads as valid, recognized trustee's locus standi to enforce the award, and set aside costs imposed on the non-liable company.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant arbitration agreement sole arbitrator service of notice trustee locus standi

Bijender v. State

20 Dec 2012 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2014:DHC:4827-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the murder conviction relying on the initial credible testimony of a key witness despite her contradictory cross-examination, emphasizing that ocular evidence prevails over medical evidence and minor discrepancies do not vitiate the prosecution case.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant witness credibility examination-in-chief hostile witness ocular evidence

RAMA ASSOCIATES PVT. LTD. v. D.D.A./M.C.D. (SLUM WING)

16 Dec 2012 · M.L. Mehta · 2013:DHC:6463

The Delhi High Court upheld the forfeiture of earnest money paid by the plaintiff in a DDA auction, holding the auction valid under the Slum Areas Act and rejecting the plaintiff's claim for refund and interest.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant earnest money forfeiture auction Delhi Development Authority

Kanwal Kishore Manchanda and Anr. v. S.D. Technical Services Pvt. Ltd.

06 Dec 2012 · M.L. Mehta, J. · 2013:DHC:6307

The Delhi High Court held that the plaintiffs waived the termination of license by claiming rent for continued occupation, the defendant is liable for outstanding electricity dues, and the plaintiffs are entitled to a mandatory injunction to recover such dues but not to occupation charges or damages.

civil appeal_allowed Significant license termination landlord-tenant relationship waiver of termination notice electricity dues liability

Sunita Devi v. Union of India & Ors.

05 Dec 2012 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Rani · 2015:DHC:2351-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Delhi High Court allowed writ petitions directing retention of candidates promoted under OBC reservation in LDCE-2011 by creating supernumerary posts adjusted against future vacancies, balancing legal correctness with equity.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Limited Departmental Competitive Examination OBC reservation promotion supernumerary posts

Sunita Devi v. Union of India & Ors.

05 Dec 2012 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Rani · 2015:DHC:2352-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed retention of candidates wrongly promoted under OBC reservation in LDCE-2011 by directing creation of supernumerary posts adjustable against future vacancies, balancing legal correctness with equity.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Limited Departmental Competitive Examination OBC reservation promotion supernumerary posts

Sunita Devi v. Union of India & Ors.

05 Dec 2012 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Rani · 2015:DHC:2350-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed writ petitions directing creation of supernumerary posts to accommodate candidates erroneously promoted under OBC reservation in LDCE promotions, preventing their reversion while adjusting seniority below meritorious candidates.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Limited Departmental Competitive Examination OBC reservation promotion supernumerary posts

Fateh Singh Chauhan v. Union of India

30 Nov 2012 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:706-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 27

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition, holding that the petitioner was barred by res judicata from seeking second financial upgradation under the MACP Scheme after earlier tribunal and court decisions.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme financial upgradation promotion res judicata

Raisham Sharma v. Rekha Datta & Anr

22 Nov 2012 · Pradeep Nandrajog · 2016:DHC:8392

The Delhi High Court quashed the complaint under the Domestic Violence Act against petitioners due to vague allegations while allowing proceedings to continue against the husband.

criminal appeal_dismissed Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12 quashing of complaint vague allegations

BPTP Limited v. CPI India Limited & Ors.

09 Nov 2012 · Pradeep Nandrajog; V. Kameswar Rao · 2013:DHC:5230-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed applications seeking clarification and modification of its ad-interim order in a shareholder dispute, emphasizing that interim reliefs must be sought before the Arbitral Tribunal and that court intervention is limited to exceptional necessity.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 9 Section 17 interim relief

BPTP Limited v. CPI India Limited & Ors.

09 Nov 2012 · Pradeep Nandrajog; V. Kameswar Rao · 2013:DHC:5229-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed BPTP Ltd.'s applications seeking clarification and modification of its interim order, emphasizing that interim reliefs must be sought before the Arbitral Tribunal and that court intervention is limited absent exceptional circumstances.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 9 petition Section 17 interim relief Doctrine of necessity

Manish Saini v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Another

08 Nov 2012 · C. Hari Shankar; Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:8452-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the cancellation of a police recruitment appointment based on the Screening Committee’s lawful assessment that an acquittal on benefit of doubt does not guarantee suitability for service in a disciplined force.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant acquittal honourable acquittal benefit of doubt Screening Committee

Surinder Pal Kapoor v. Swaran Katyal & Ors.

31 Oct 2012 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:6274-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the invalidation of a sale deed executed by an infirm mother shortly before death, affirming the rightful ownership of the front portion of the property by the daughter and dismissing the son's appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant sale deed property dispute capacity to contract manipulation

HPCL-Mittal Pipeline Limited v. Coastal Marine Construction and Engineering

31 Oct 2012 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:3290

The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award for breach of natural justice where the tribunal ignored the respondent's defence without adequate notice or opportunity, emphasizing the need for fair procedure in arbitration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 natural justice Statement of Defence para-wise denial

Union of India v. Nisha Priya Bhatia

21 Oct 2012 · S. Ravindra Bhat; R.V. Easwar · 2013:DHC:5341-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's order directing regularization of the respondent's absence and pension revision, emphasizing employer's duty to act fairly and comply with Vishaka guidelines before initiating departmental inquiry.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant unauthorized absence regularization of absence departmental inquiry CCS Pension Rules

Animesh Rastogi, Vibhav Singh, Rajat Dubey and Shashank Pandey v. 658200 EX WO Raj Kishor Singh

18 Oct 2012 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:3112-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 21

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's petition and upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption of service-attributable disability and the limited scope of writ jurisdiction.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal certiorari jurisdiction

Gold Cause Construction Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Anand Prakash Gupta

17 Oct 2012 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:3374
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Delhi High Court is considering whether the executing court exceeded its jurisdiction by directing possession of shops differing in number and area from those decreed in a specific performance suit.

civil other specific performance execution of decree shop number specific area specific

Naresh Kumar Chander v. Delhi University

10 Oct 2012 · V. Kameswar Rao, J · 2017:DHC:2813

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition of a student seeking a special chance to appear in B.Sc. examinations beyond the prescribed span period due to his failure to submit examination forms and fees despite the University’s offer.

administrative petition_dismissed special chance span period examination form examination fee

b3cffcc0c709074263bec75006f5a0b453921cf9d60bea91c2db97cc1445a45e

20 Sep 2012 · S. Muralidhar · 2017:DHC:8935-DB

The Court dismissed appeals challenging the deletion of penalty under Sections 271D and 271E of the Income Tax Act imposed on Sahara Indian Financial Corporation Ltd., affirming the ITAT's order.

tax appeal_dismissed Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 271D Section 271E penalty deletion

S.P. Sharma v. IFCI Ltd. & Anr.

11 Sep 2012 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:6769-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a termination letter citing 'lapses committed' is stigmatic, requiring a prior inquiry, and quashed the termination of a probationer’s service without such inquiry.

labor appeal_allowed Significant stigmatic termination probationer service termination natural justice reputation as legal right