Delhi High Court

98,981 judgments

Year:

Surjeet Singh and Anr v. Delhi Development Authority and Anr

07 Mar 2013 · Reva Khetrapal · 2013:DHC:1246

The Delhi High Court quashed the DDA's arbitrary withdrawal of a developed plot allotment under the Gadgil Assurance Scheme, affirming the petitioners' right to possession and condemning malafide administrative conduct.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Gadgil Assurance Scheme Delhi Development Authority alternative allotment developed land

Ravi Mittal v. Pankaj Agrawal

07 Mar 2013 · Manmohan Singh · 2013:DHC:1274

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award allowing the respondent to abandon a revival agreement under contractual clauses and directed refund of Rs. 25 lakhs, dismissing the petitioner's challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Arbitral award Contract interpretation

Bhawani Singh v. Union of India and Anr

07 Mar 2013 · S. Ravindra Bhat; A. K. Pathak · 2013:DHC:1270-DB

The Delhi High Court held that failure to indicate preference in paramilitary recruitment cannot unfairly exclude a candidate from border area vacancies, directing his consideration for appointment.

administrative petition_allowed Significant paramilitary recruitment selection process preference indication border area reservation

Bharat Bhushan v. Union of India & Ors.

07 Mar 2013 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2013:DHC:1271

The Delhi High Court held that acceptance of lesser VRS benefits without objection bars an employee from claiming higher benefits based on adhoc promotion not confirmed due to non-completion of mandatory rural posting.

employment petition_dismissed Significant Voluntary Retirement Scheme VRS benefits adhoc promotion rural/semi-urban posting

Ajit Rai Rehal & Ors. v. Mangal Dass & Ors.

07 Mar 2013 · V.K. Shali · 2013:DHC:1272

The Delhi High Court dismissed a 31-year-old regular second appeal against eviction for non-conforming use, holding no substantial question of law arises after lease termination and eviction orders under the Public Premises Act.

property appeal_dismissed Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(k) non-conforming use eviction

Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate. v. JAG MOriAN LAL VARSHNEY

06 Mar 2013 · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BI.E MS. JUSTICE V... · 2013:DHC:7747

The Delhi High Court held that employees of a school taken over by the government acquire government employee status only from the formal takeover date, and prior service cannot be counted for Assured Career Progression benefits.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Assured Career Progression Scheme Delhi School Education Rules 1973 service reckoning government takeover

S BAKEMANS INDUSTRIES PVT LTD v. H 5 CEYLON BISCUITS PVT LTD & ORS

06 Mar 2013 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Indermeet Kaur · 2013:DHC:8292-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal withdrawn by the appellant and directed the Official Liquidator to negotiate electricity dues with PSEB based on actual usage during receivership.

corporate appeal_dismissed Official Liquidator electricity charges court-appointed Receiver Punjab State Electricity Board

Madan Singh & Anr. v. Vee Pee International Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

06 Mar 2013 · G. P. Mittal · 2013:DHC:7722

The Delhi High Court quashed a Section 138 NI Act complaint against petitioners wrongly prosecuted as partners of a proprietorship firm, holding that inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC permits quashing where unimpeachable evidence disproves the prosecution's case.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 482 CrPC quashing of complaint proprietorship vs partnership

GNCT OF DELHI v. RATI RAM

06 Mar 2013 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Veena Birbal · 2013:DHC:7483-DB

The Delhi High Court held that employees of a school taken over by the government acquire government service status only from the formal takeover date, limiting ACP/MACP benefits to service from that date onward.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Assured Career Progression Scheme Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme service reckoning government takeover

Vijay Thukral and Anr. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Anr.

06 Mar 2013 · G. S. Sistawi · 2013:DHC:7412

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioners to repair a dangerous building portion under MCD supervision instead of vacating the premises, disposing of the writ petition on agreed terms.

administrative petition_allowed Article 226 Constitution of India Section 349 Delhi Municipal Corporation Act dangerous building writ of certiorari

Prabha Gautam v. State & Ors.

06 Mar 2013 · Kailash Gambhir · 2013:DHC:7310

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the respondent, holding that cancellation requires strong grounds and the bail order was passed after proper consideration of facts.

criminal petition_dismissed anticipatory bail cancellation of bail Section 439(2) Cr.P.C. Section 482 Cr.P.C.

Amritabaweja; Amandeep Baweja; Pawandeep Baweja v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

06 Mar 2013 · S. P. Garg · 2013:DHC:6955

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to accused in dowry and criminal breach of trust case subject to bond, surety, payment of ₹3 lakhs compensation, and cooperation with investigation.

criminal appeal_allowed anticipatory bail Section 406 IPC Section 498A IPC Section 34 IPC

Through: Mr. Gaurav Bahl, Adv v. MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS & ANR

06 Mar 2013 · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL; HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE... · 2013:DHC:7190-DB

The petitioner withdrew the writ petition and connected application, leading to their dismissal, while the exemption application was allowed subject to exceptions.

other petition_dismissed Procedural writ petition withdrawal exemption application dismissal

Sikander Mirza and Ors. v. State & Ors.

06 Mar 2013 · Sunil Gaur · 2013:DHC:1245

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order framing charges against the petitioners for attempt to murder, poisoning, cruelty, and dowry offences, dismissing the revision petition for discharge at the charge framing stage.

criminal appeal_dismissed charge framing unexplained delay in FIR FSL report attempt to poison

Ritu Kaushal v. Directorate of Education & Ors.

06 Mar 2013 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2013:DHC:1234

The Delhi High Court held that removal from an additional duty without substantive post or pay reduction does not amount to demotion or loss of rank, dismissing the teacher's petition challenging her removal as Primary Wing Coordinator.

labor petition_dismissed Significant Primary Wing Coordinator demotion loss of rank additional duty

State Trading Corporation of India Ltd v. State Bank of India & Ors.

06 Mar 2013 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Indermeet Kaur · 2013:DHC:1224-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld foreign arbitration awards and Swiss Court injunctions, dismissed the writ petition, and held the petitioner liable to repay amounts wrongfully obtained under a bank guarantee, emphasizing the binding nature of foreign judgments and the doctrine of unjust enrichment.

civil petition_dismissed Significant bank guarantee foreign award arbitration Swiss Court injunction

Shambhu Nath Das and Ors. v. Director of Education and Ors.

06 Mar 2013 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2013:DHC:1232

The Delhi High Court directed payment of Sixth Pay Commission arrears with interest to school employees, rejecting delay due to change in Managing Committee.

labor petition_allowed Significant Sixth Pay Commission monetary benefits arrears writ petition

Ram Sarup @ Nathan Ram v. Kokila Devi & Ors.

06 Mar 2013 · V.K. Shali · 2013:DHC:1233

The Delhi High Court dismissed a regular second appeal in a possession suit, holding that disputed ownership and municipal records raised questions of fact, not substantial questions of law.

civil appeal_dismissed regular second appeal substantial question of law possession suit ownership proof

Bijoy Kumar Bazaz v. M/S Yamaha Motor Pvt. Ltd.

06 Mar 2013 · Manmohan Singh · 2013:DHC:1227

The Delhi High Court held that delay of 225 days in re-filing objections under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act cannot be condoned as the statutory limitation period is mandatory and unextendible.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 condonation of delay limitation period

Food Corporation of India v. Guru Ram Das Rice & Oil Mills and Partners & Ors.

06 Mar 2013 · Manmohan Singh · 2013:DHC:1226

The Delhi High Court held that delay in re-filing objections to an arbitral award beyond the statutory limitation under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot be condoned, dismissing the petition for delay caused by negligence.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 condonation of delay limitation period