Delhi High Court
98,981 judgments
Umesh Barthwal v. GNCT of Delhi and Ors.
Delhi High Court held that out of turn promotions under Rule 19 of Delhi Police Rules must be granted retrospectively from the date vacancies accrue, interpreting the 5% quota liberally to reward gallantry and devotion to duty.
Umesh Barthwal v. GNCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that out of turn promotions under Rule 19 of the Delhi Police Rules can be granted retrospectively as vacancies accrue, entitling officers to notional seniority and pay increments.
Umesh Barthwal v. GNCT of Delhi and Ors.
Delhi High Court held that out of turn promotions under Rule 19 of Delhi Police Rules must be granted retrospectively from the date vacancies accrue, interpreting the 5% quota purposively to reward gallantry.
Dr. Sabita Shome v. The Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the department's refusal to permit withdrawal of resignation after more than a year of acceptance, emphasizing limited judicial review over discretionary administrative decisions under CCS (Pension) Rules.
Union of India v. Laxmi Devi
The Delhi High Court held that the widow of a railway employee who died in service is entitled to family pension and gratuity payable on death in harness, quashed excessive penal rent demands for unauthorized occupation, and directed equitable release of terminal benefits.
Jarnail Singh v. UOI
The Court held that contracting a second marriage without legal divorce constitutes misconduct, but allowed the petitioner to seek modification of punishment upon proof of valid divorce.
Amrik Singh v. DTC
The Delhi High Court held that removal from service for unauthorized absence was disproportionate and substituted it with compulsory retirement entitling the petitioner to pension and gratuity under CCS Pension Rules.
Delhi Development Authority v. Bandana Mukherjee
The Delhi High Court held that failure to intimate change of address and sending allotment letters to a deceased husband's occupational address does not entitle a registrant to challenge cancellation of housing allotment under NPRS 1979.
Commissioner of Police v. Badal Singh
The Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's order directing promotion and ACP benefits to a police officer with multiple finalized penalties, holding that adverse service record and penalties independently justify denial of promotion.
Shikha Sharma v. Guru Harkrishan Public School & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that employees of unaided minority schools are entitled to 6th and 7th CPC benefits under Section 10 of the DSE Act, rejecting financial hardship and fee revision approval as preconditions.
Charanjit Kaur v. Guru Harkrishan Public School
The Delhi High Court directed the school to pay arrears and terminal benefits under the 6th and 7th CPC to the petitioner’s late husband’s estate with interest, affirming statutory entitlement and timelines for compliance.
Daljeet Kaur Bindra & Ors. v. Directorate of Education & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed an unaided minority school to implement 6th and 7th CPC pay revisions, release arrears with interest, and pay terminal benefits to serving and retired employees, affirming their entitlement under law and prior judgments.
Jasneet Kaur & Ors. v. Directorate of Education & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed unaided private school employees to be paid arrears and terminal benefits as per 6th and 7th CPC recommendations with interest, affirming their entitlement under law and prior judgments.
Sudha Katoch v. Directorate of Education
Delhi High Court directs unaided minority school to implement 6th and 7th CPC pay revisions, release arrears with interest, and pay terminal benefits to serving and retired employees in line with statutory and judicial mandates.
Maninder Kaur Sawhney v. Education Department & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that employees of unaided minority schools are entitled to salary revision and arrears as per the 7th CPC and directed payment of arrears with interest, while confirming the statutory gratuity ceiling.
Raghuvinder Kaur Grover v. Directorate of Education & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed an unaided minority school to implement 6th and 7th CPC pay revisions, release arrears and terminal benefits with interest, affirming employees' entitlement to pay parity with government schools.
Rakesh Kumar Bhagat & Ors. v. Guru Harkishan Public School & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that recognized private unaided minority schools are statutorily bound under Section 10(1) of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 to implement 6th and 7th Pay Commission recommendations and pay arrears to their employees, rejecting claims of exemption based on minority status or financial constraints.
Yog Raj Chopra v. S.C. Chopra
The High Court of Delhi dismissed two appeals filed by Yog Raj Chopra as withdrawn upon the appellant's counsel's request.
Kumar Goyal v. Advanced Medical Optics P. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act must be filed in courts having jurisdiction over the place of cheque dishonour and quashed complaints filed in Delhi for lack of territorial jurisdiction.
Swastik Sales Corporation & Ors. v. Advanced Medical Optics I P. Ltd.
Delhi High Court held that criminal complaints under Section 138 NI Act must be tried by courts where the cheque is dishonoured, quashing complaints filed in Delhi for lack of territorial jurisdiction.