Full Text
Translation output
^:l f $-R-72 HIGH COURT OF DELHI Crl. Rev. P. No.713/2007
SURESH KUMAR
Through: Nemo.
NEW DELHI..... Petitioner rJ GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Sunil Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for State
SURESH KUMAR
Through: Nemo.
NEW DELHI..... Petitioner rJ GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Sunil Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for State
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ST]NIL GAT]R
Vo 15.03.2013 While entertaining this revision petition against impugned order of 20ft November, 2007 upholding petitioner's sentence of rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months for the offences punishable under Sections 379 read With Section 34 of IPC, the substantive sentence imposed upon petitioner was suspended.
At the final hearing of this revision petition, to secure presence of petitioner bailable warants were ordered to be issued against him, which have been received back with the report that his whereabouts are not known.
Learned Additional Public Prosecutor points out that the conviction of the petitioner is well merited on the basis of evidence of Ishwari Prasad, (PW-4) and stolen articles were recovered from one Kulamma @ Laxmi, who has been also convicted for the
I
Crl.Rev.P. No. 7 73 / 2007 Page 1 2013:DHC:7823
?' t offence punishable under Sections 411 of IPC.
Upon perusal of this revision petition and the impugned order, I find no illegality or infirmity in i!. Consequently, this revision petition is dismissed.
Let the trial court ensure that the petitioner serves out the sentence as awarded to him.
Accordingly, this petition is disposed of.
(srrNrl GAIIR)
JT]DGE MARCH 15,2013 pkb a Crl.Rev.P. No. 7 t3 / 2007 Page2
2013:DHC:7823
Vo 15.03.2013 While entertaining this revision petition against impugned order of 20ft November, 2007 upholding petitioner's sentence of rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months for the offences punishable under Sections 379 read With Section 34 of IPC, the substantive sentence imposed upon petitioner was suspended.
At the final hearing of this revision petition, to secure presence of petitioner bailable warants were ordered to be issued against him, which have been received back with the report that his whereabouts are not known.
Learned Additional Public Prosecutor points out that the conviction of the petitioner is well merited on the basis of evidence of Ishwari Prasad, (PW-4) and stolen articles were recovered from one Kulamma @ Laxmi, who has been also convicted for the
I
Crl.Rev.P. No. 7 73 / 2007 Page 1 2013:DHC:7823
?' t offence punishable under Sections 411 of IPC.
Upon perusal of this revision petition and the impugned order, I find no illegality or infirmity in i!. Consequently, this revision petition is dismissed.
Let the trial court ensure that the petitioner serves out the sentence as awarded to him.
Accordingly, this petition is disposed of.
(srrNrl GAIIR)
JT]DGE MARCH 15,2013 pkb a Crl.Rev.P. No. 7 t3 / 2007 Page2
2013:DHC:7823
JUDGMENT