Delhi High Court

98,981 judgments

Year:

National Insurance Company Ltd v. Sanwar Mal & Ors.

15 Apr 2013 · Suresh Kait

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order allowing vehicle owner and driver to defend against insurer's recovery claim despite initial non-appearance, emphasizing insurer's liability and owners' right to contest.

civil appeal_dismissed Motor Accident Claims Tribunal recovery rights insurance liability valid permit

STORE ONE RETAILINDIA LTD v. M/SPRAGYAPRODUCTSPVT LTD

15 Apr 2013 · Manmohan · 2013:DHC:6677

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate multiple interconnected commercial disputes, directing timelines for claims and replies and granting liberty to file applications under Section 1B of the Court Fees Act.

civil other arbitration sole arbitrator appointment of arbitrator Court Fees Act Section 1B

Surya Kumar v. Union of India

15 Apr 2013 · S. RAVINDRA BHAT; SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA · 2013:DHC:1899-DB

The Delhi High Court held that under BSF Rules, a resignation once accepted cannot be withdrawn before its effective date, and dismissed the petitioner’s claim for reinstatement due to delay and acquiescence.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant resignation withdrawal of resignation Border Security Force Rules, 1969 Article 226

SHRI DEVINDER SINGH DABBAS & ORS. v. THE ADMINISTRATOR OF UNION TERRITORY OF DELHI & ORS.

15 Apr 2013 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2013:DHC:1896

The Delhi High Court held that retrospective regularization of ad hoc appointees without following service rules is invalid and they cannot claim seniority over regularly appointed employees.

administrative petition_allowed Significant regularization seniority ad hoc appointment service rules

M/S. AJANTA OFFSET & PACKAGING LTD. v. M/S. HEAD START ADVERTISING & MARKETING (P) LTD.

15 Apr 2013 · M.L. Mehta · 2013:DHC:1891

The Delhi High Court held that the plaintiff and its divisions are not separate legal entities and decreed recovery of outstanding dues with interest against the defendant in a suit for money recovery.

civil appeal_allowed recovery of money mis-joinder of parties division of company interest pendente lite

Delhi Transport Corporation v. Satbir Singh

15 Apr 2013 · THE CHIEF JUSTICE; V.K. JAIN · 2013:DHC:1894-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a workman is entitled to 100% back wages from the date a Labour Court award becomes enforceable until reinstatement if the employer delays implementation beyond the award's prescribed period.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Labour Court award back wages reinstatement

Pran Nath Bararoo v. Estate Officer & Anr.

15 Apr 2013 · Chief Justice; V. K. Jain · 2013:DHC:1895-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and remanded the eviction matter for fresh consideration of a retired Kashmiri Pandit BSF employee's right to retain government accommodation due to unsafe conditions in Jammu and Kashmir.

property appeal_allowed Significant Public Premises (Eviction and Unauthorized Occupants) Act government accommodation Kashmiri Pandits right to shelter

P.K. Gupta v. Director Nehru Memorial Museum & Library

15 Apr 2013 · CHIEF JUSTICE; V.K. Jain · 2013:DHC:1892-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of a writ petition challenging disciplinary penalty, remanding the matter for fresh consideration of denial of cross-examination and sufficiency of evidence.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant disciplinary inquiry natural justice cross-examination evidence

Rajiv Bansal; Parambir Singh; Swati v. Kiran Kohli

15 Apr 2013 · The Chief Justice; V. K. Jain · 2013:DHC:1893-DB

The Delhi High Court held that unauthorized transfer of leasehold property by Will without lessor's consent violates sub-lease terms, justifying DDA's suspension of mutation and refusal of freehold conversion absent required documents.

property appeal_allowed Significant leasehold property sub-lease deed earned increase mutation

IUP Jindal Metals & Alloys Ltd. v. M/S Conee Chains Private Ltd.

15 Apr 2013 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2013:DHC:1898

The Delhi High Court dismissed the defendant's leave to defend application in a suit under Order 37 CPC for recovery of unpaid invoices, holding the court had territorial jurisdiction and awarding the plaintiff principal and interest from the date of acknowledgment.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order 37 CPC leave to defend territorial jurisdiction acknowledgment of debt

State v. Rahul

15 Apr 2013 · Gita Mittal; J. R. Midha · 2013:DHC:1897-DB

The Delhi High Court clarified the legal standards and procedures for assessing the competency of child witnesses in criminal trials, emphasizing child-friendly approaches and adherence to statutory and judicial guidelines to protect the best interests of the child.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant child witness competency Section 118 Indian Evidence Act sexual offences child testimony guidelines

Sita Devi & Anr v. Munne & Ors

15 Apr 2013 · Suresh Kait, J. · 2013:DHC:1890

The Delhi High Court held that the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal has jurisdiction to entertain claims where the claimant resides in Delhi, even if the accident occurred outside Delhi, and remanded the matter for inquiry and adjudication.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 jurisdiction claim petition residence of claimant

NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD v. SANWAR MAL

15 Apr 2013 · SURESH KAIT · 2013:DHC:1888

The Delhi High Court upheld the tribunal's order allowing insured parties to contest insurer's recovery claim by leading evidence on vehicle permit validity, dismissing the insurer's petitions.

civil appeal_dismissed Motor Vehicles Act insurance recovery permit validity fitness certificate

Mukhtiar Singh v. Union of India & Anr.

15 Apr 2013 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Rani · 2013:DHC:1887-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition holding that financial upgradation and pay parity claims must align with departmental hierarchies and that absorption on a lower pay scale with pay protection does not entitle an employee to higher pay or parity with others.

service_law petition_dismissed Significant Assured Career Progression Scheme Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme financial upgradation pay parity

State Bank of India v. Union of India and Ors.

15 Apr 2013 · Rajiv Shakdher, J · 2013:DHC:1889
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that earnest money paid to SBI under a government scheme became SBI's property and could not be forfeited under SAFEMA as SBI was a bona fide transferee without knowledge of taint.

administrative petition_allowed Significant earnest money forfeiture SAFEMA bona fide transferee

Dev Sagar v. State of Delhi

12 Apr 2013 · Mukta Gupta · 2013:DHC:8647

The Delhi High Court upheld convictions under Section 18(c) NDPS Act but reduced the sentence from 13 to 10 years, emphasizing proper procedural compliance and moderation in sentencing.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 18(c) Section 50 NDPS Act commercial quantity

Ryan International School & Anr. v. Chips School for Professional Education

12 Apr 2013 · A.K. Pathak · 2013:DHC:8569

The Delhi High Court disposed of two civil appeals as settled after the appellants paid the respondent the agreed sum, ordering refund of half the court fee and dismissal of related applications.

civil settled amicable settlement decree satisfaction appeal disposal court fee refund

Ryan International School & Anr v. Chips School for Professional Education

12 Apr 2013 · A.K. Pathak · 2013:DHC:8568

The Delhi High Court disposed of civil appeals as settled following amicable resolution and payment satisfying the decree, ordering partial refund of court fees.

civil settled amicable settlement appeal disposal decree satisfaction court fee refund

Deshraj Gupta & Ors. v. Shivraj Gupta & Ors.

12 Apr 2013 · Manmohan Singh · 2013:DHC:8390

The Delhi High Court granted assistance under Section 27 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to summon a witness at his residential address and allowed cross-examination on all relevant matters in arbitration proceedings.

civil petition_allowed Section 27 Arbitration and Conciliation Act summoning witness arbitration proceedings cross-examination rights

Choice Hospitality (India) Pvt Ltd v. Bhatnagar Hotel & Resort Limited

12 Apr 2013 · Manmohan Singh · 2013:DHC:8368

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve disputes arising from a franchise agreement involving alleged breach and termination.

civil appeal_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(5) Franchise Agreement Arbitrator appointment