Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
GURUCHARAN SINGH WASON v. PRAFUL PRAKASH RAMANAND
The Delhi High Court held that the Rent Controller has no power to condone delay beyond 15 days in filing leave to defend under Section 25B of the Delhi Rent Control Act, dismissing the tenant's challenge but granting reasonable time to vacate the premises.
Ashok Kumar v. State
The Delhi High Court modified the appellant's conviction from Section 307 IPC to Section 326 IPC, reducing the sentence based on lack of intent to kill and nature of injuries.
Pawan Kumar v. Shiv Chaudhary & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal for enhancement of compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act due to the appellant's failure to show sufficient cause for condonation of a 252-day delay in filing the appeal.
Rajeshwari v. Shiv Chaudhary & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal for enhancement of compensation due to the appellant's failure to show sufficient cause for a 252-day delay in filing the appeal under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
Manish Kumar v. Hemlata Sharma
The Delhi High Court held that the Rent Controller has no jurisdiction to condone delay beyond 15 days for filing leave to defend under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, upholding eviction but granted the tenant reasonable time to vacate the premises.
Narender v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld robbery and arms possession convictions but set aside abduction with intent to murder charges, reducing sentences accordingly.
Narender v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for armed robbery and firearm possession but reduced sentences, clarifying the scope of abduction and related charges under IPC and Arms Act.
Narender v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for robbery with firearms and possession of illegal arms but set aside abduction with intent to murder, reducing sentences accordingly.
SHRI PHOOL SINGH v. SH. MAMAN & ANR.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's regular second appeal in a suit for possession due to failure to prove ownership, upholding the concurrent findings of the lower courts.
Ram Janam v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of four appellants for armed robbery based on spot arrest and recovery of stolen property and weapons, dismissing their claims of false implication despite minor discrepancies in the complainant's testimony.
Ram Janam v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of four appellants for armed robbery based on spot arrest and recovery evidence, dismissing their claims of false implication despite minor discrepancies in the complainant's testimony.
Ram Janam v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of four appellants for armed robbery based on spot arrest and recovery, dismissing their appeals despite minor discrepancies in the complainant's testimony.
Director of Income Tax v. The Guru Harkishan Medical Trust
The Delhi High Court held that the Delhi Sikh Gurudwara Management Committee lacked statutory power to create the Guru Harkishan Medical Trust, rendering the trust illegal and ineligible for income tax exemption under Section 12A.
Sh. Pradyot K. Misra v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed the reassessment notice under Sections 147/148 of the Income Tax Act for lack of tangible material and unreasonable exercise of power, emphasizing that reopening requires a reasonable opinion based on fresh evidence.
Shamshad v. State
The Delhi High Court acquitted appellants Shaqueel and Shamshad of dacoity charges due to inconsistencies in prosecution evidence and extended the benefit of doubt following the acquittal of co-accused.
YAHOO INC. v. FIROZ NADIAWALA & ORS
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction restraining defendants from using the well-known trademark "YAHOO" as a film title, holding it infringed and passed off the plaintiff's registered mark.
Delhi Stock Exchange Association Ltd. v. Hari Om Maheshwari
The Delhi High Court modified a compromise decree to remove the bank guarantee condition, directing payment to the plaintiff where the respondent failed to initiate arbitration as mandated, enabling enforcement of the decree.
Jeevan Dass v. Anil Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld equitable partition of residential premises held in permissive possession by family members without title but denied partition or share in the business absent proof of joint family business.
Jeevan Dass v. Anil Sharma
The Delhi High Court affirmed equitable partition of residential premises held by permissive family occupation but denied partition or share in a business takhat absent proof of joint family business or title.
Deepak Khosla v. High Court of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that its inherent power to regulate vexatious litigation and impose costs is subject to statutory limits and that judicial orders of the High Court cannot be challenged under writ jurisdiction bypassing appellate remedies.