Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
Sanjay v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for armed train robbery based on eyewitness identification, recovery of stolen mobile phones, and adverse inference from refusal to join identification parade, while acquitting two accused for lack of evidence.
Sanjay v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for train dacoity based on eyewitness identification and recovery of stolen mobile phones, while acquitting two accused for lack of evidence.
S.K. Jain v. Vijay Kalra
The High Court upheld dismissal of complaints under Section 138 NI Act, holding that the respondent successfully rebutted the presumption of consideration for the cheques by adducing credible evidence.
S.K. Jain v. Vijay Kalra
The High Court dismissed appeals challenging dismissal of complaints under Section 138 N.I. Act, holding that the respondent successfully rebutted the presumption of consideration for the cheques.
Bharat Bhushan Khatri v. I.G.I.P.ED. & Sport Sciences
The Delhi High Court directed regularization of petitioners' appointments and promotions by considering them for promotion through a valid Departmental Promotion Committee despite earlier procedural irregularities.
Bharat Bhushan Khatri v. I.G.I.P.ED. & Sport Sciences
The Delhi High Court directed reconsideration of petitioners' promotions through a valid Departmental Promotion Committee after finding procedural irregularities in their initial appointments and promotions.
Sh. Chhinda v. Ms. Sunita Jain & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal, upholding the respondents' possession suit based on proved ownership and rejecting the appellant's claim of municipal land occupation and adverse possession.
Chandre (Deceased) Through LRs & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for category 'A' land acquisition to Rs.16.50 lakhs per precedent, allowing the appeal but denying interest for delay.
Shapoorji Pallonji & Co Ltd v. M/S Bhasin Infotech & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court modified an interim injunction to restrict it to adequate security furnished by the respondent and appointed a sole Arbitrator to adjudicate disputes under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Shapoorji Pallonji & Co Ltd v. M/S Bhasin Infotech & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court modified an interim injunction to restrict it to an exclusive first charge over specified commercial property as security and appointed a sole Arbitrator to adjudicate disputes under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Allauddin v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court acquitted appellants charged with robbery under Sections 392 and 397 IPC due to major inconsistencies in prosecution evidence and investigative lapses, granting them benefit of doubt.
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD v. KRISHNA DEVI & ORS.
The Delhi High Court partially allowed the insurer's appeal, recalculating compensation by applying 15% future prospects addition and one-fourth deduction for personal expenses, while enhancing amounts for loss of consortium and funeral expenses.
Anil Kumar Yadav v. State
The Delhi High Court acquitted appellants of robbery and conspiracy charges due to unreliable witness identification and failure to prove stolen property identity beyond reasonable doubt.
Kuldeep Singh @ Kalli v. State
The Delhi High Court allowed Kuldeep Singh's criminal appeal relying on a detailed common judgment in a related case.
Tinku @ Danish v. State
The High Court of Delhi allowed the appellant's criminal appeal based on a detailed common judgment in a connected case.
Mahender @ Dharmender v. State
The Delhi High Court allowed the criminal appeal of Mahender @ Dharmender by referring to a detailed common judgment delivered in a related case on the same day.
Kuldeep Singh @ Kalli v. State
The High Court of Delhi allowed Kuldeep Singh's criminal appeal by referring to a detailed common judgment in a related case.
Rohtas Singh & Anr. v. Bhateri Devi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that defendants cannot remain absent indefinitely after suit transfer without making enquiries, and dismissed their appeal against refusal to set aside ex parte decree in a possession suit.
Santu Dass v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside the conviction under Section 363 IPC, holding that the prosecutrix was not proven to be a minor and the benefit of doubt regarding age must be given to the accused.
REAL HOUSE DISTILLERY PVT LTD v. PERNOD RICARD S.A.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appellants to use their new label including navy blue color, holding it not deceptively similar to the respondents' registered trade mark, and upheld the injunction against the old label.