Delhi High Court

92,628 judgments

Year:

Lalan Verma v. Sonu Kumar Yadav & Ors.

04 Mar 2014 · Suresh Kait · 2014:DHC:1174

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to enhance compensation for 25% permanent disability of the appellant's left lower limb, directing payment with interest and recognizing loss of earning capacity.

civil appeal_allowed Significant permanent disability functional disability compensation loss of earning capacity

New India Assurance Co Ltd v. Lakhan Singh Bisht & Ors

04 Mar 2014 · Suresh Kait · 2014:DHC:1173

The Delhi High Court held that an insurer is liable to pay compensation in a motor accident claim even if the driver was unlicensed, but retains the right to recover the amount from the vehicle owner.

motor_accident_claims appeal_dismissed Significant motor accident claim insurance liability invalid driving licence right of recovery

CIT v. Jain Cooperative Bank Ltd

04 Mar 2014 · S. RAVINDRA BHAT; R.V. EASWAR · 2014:DHC:1180-DB

Judgment dated 04.03.2014 in ITA 315/2012 between CIT and Jain Cooperative Bank Ltd by Delhi High Court; detailed order referenced but text not provided.

other

Maharaj Singh v. Satbir Singh

04 Mar 2014 · Manmohan Singh · 2014:DHC:1167
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The High Court held that when summons are served twice, the tenant's 15-day limitation period to file leave to defend runs from the second service, allowing the tenant's application filed within that period.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 leave to defend eviction petition service of summons

Ram Janam v. State

04 Mar 2014 · Sunil Gaur · 2014:DHC:1196

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of four appellants for armed robbery based on credible police and complainant evidence despite minor discrepancies in identification.

criminal appeal_dismissed robbery Section 392 IPC Section 397 IPC Section 25 Arms Act

Sri Balaji Financer v. Suraj Prakash

04 Mar 2014 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2014:DHC:1183

The Delhi High Court dismissed the defendant's leave to defend in a loan recovery suit under Order 37 CPC, holding that admitted receipt of loan and cheques coupled with mala fide denial of promissory notes justified summary decree for the plaintiff.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order 37 CPC leave to defend promissory notes loan recovery

Revenue v. Jain Cooperative Bank Ltd

04 Mar 2014 · S. RAVINDRA BHAT; R.V. EASWAR · 2014:DHC:1178-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's decision allowing a cooperative bank's deduction for bad debts written off under RBI's one-time settlement scheme, clarifying the interplay of Sections 36, 41, and 80P of the Income Tax Act.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant bad debts deduction Section 36(1)(viia) Section 36(2)

Singhasan v. State of NCT of Delhi

03 Mar 2014 · V.K. Jain, J. · 2014:DHC:1130
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that weapons recovered pursuant to accused's disclosure statements are admissible without independent witnesses, acquitted two appellants of Section 308 IPC charges, convicted one under Section 324 IPC, and granted all benefit of probation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 27 Evidence Act Section 308 IPC Section 324 IPC Section 323 IPC

Singhasan v. State of NCT of Delhi

03 Mar 2014 · V.K. Jain, J. · 2014:DHC:1140
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court modified convictions in a group assault case, holding that only the owner who used an iron rod was guilty under Section 324 IPC, while others were liable for lesser injuries, and granted probation with compensation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 308 IPC Section 324 IPC Section 323 IPC disclosure statement

Chhatravas, Chandra Arya Vidya Mandir v. The Director, Deptt of Women and Child Dev. & Anr

03 Mar 2014 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Jayant Nath · 2014:DHC:1128-DB

Delhi High Court held that institutions housing children in need of care and protection must obtain registration under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000, and cannot rely solely on licenses under the repealed Women and Children Institutions Licensing Act, 1956.

administrative other Significant Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 Women and Children Institutions Licensing Act, 1956 registration under Section 34(3) recognition of institutions

S.P. Singh v. Union of India & Ors.

03 Mar 2014 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Jayant Nath · 2014:DHC:1129-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a CISF Head Constable for assault and misconduct, ruling that procedural lapses were cured by a fresh inquiry and minor amendments to charges did not vitiate the disciplinary proceedings.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disciplinary proceedings charge memorandum amendment of charge procedural fairness

Singhasan v. State of NCT of Delhi

03 Mar 2014 · V.K. Jain · 2014:DHC:1139
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court modified convictions in a group assault case, holding that recovery of weapons under accused's disclosure is admissible without independent witnesses and that only the appellant using an iron rod was liable for grievous injury, while others were liable for simple injuries.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 308 IPC Section 324 IPC Section 323 IPC Section 27 Evidence Act

Punjab & Sind Bank v. Mohd. Tayyab & Ors.

03 Mar 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:1153

Delhi courts have territorial jurisdiction over a money recovery suit where the loan was granted and defendants reside, and courts may reduce interest rates pendente lite and future under Section 34 CPC in light of Supreme Court precedents.

civil appeal_allowed Significant territorial jurisdiction money recovery suit mortgaged property Order 34 CPC

Sarita Arora & Anr. v. Kiran Kad & Anr.

03 Mar 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:1154

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's grant of interim injunction restraining alienation of disputed property, affirming the necessity of prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury for such relief.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant interim injunction Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC prima facie case balance of convenience

Ranjeet v. State (NCT of Delhi)

03 Mar 2014 · Deepa Sharma · 2014:DHC:1157

The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction under Section 307 IPC based on credible identification evidence and adverse inference from refusal to participate in TIP, but acquitted him of theft under Section 379 IPC due to lack of corroborative evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Test Identification Parade Identification evidence Adverse inference Section 307 IPC

Naresh Chadha & Ors. v. Dharamveer Singh & Ors.

03 Mar 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:1156

The Delhi High Court held that tenancy rights under the Delhi Rent Control Act are inherited by all legal heirs if the contractual tenancy was not terminated during the tenant's lifetime, dismissing the appeal and upholding the appellate court's decision denying possession.

property appeal_dismissed Significant contractual tenancy Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 106 Transfer of Property Act tenancy termination notice

Sharad P Jagtiani v. M/S Edelweiss Securities Limited

03 Mar 2014 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2014:DHC:1148

The Delhi High Court held that a plea invoking arbitration raised in the written statement suffices under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to oust court jurisdiction and mandate reference to arbitration, even without a separate application or specific prayer.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration Agreement Section 8 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Jurisdiction Maintainability

R R Gautam v. P K Gupta

03 Mar 2014 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2014:DHC:1158

The Delhi High Court dismissed a contempt petition challenging the UPSC recommendation and MCD's regularization order, affirming that ad hoc doctors' regularization is effective only from the date of UPSC recommendation as per Supreme Court precedent.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant regularization ad hoc doctors Union Public Service Commission Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Bhanmati Devi & Ors. v. Singh Raj & Ors.

03 Mar 2014 · Suresh Kait · 2014:DHC:1151

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by adding 30% future prospects to the deceased's income and increasing amounts for loss of consortium and funeral expenses, directing the insurer to pay the enhanced amount with interest.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation future prospects loss of consortium

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD v. PHOOL CHAND & ORS

03 Mar 2014 · Suresh Kait · 2014:DHC:1149

The Delhi High Court allowed the insurer's appeal and reduced the compensation awarded under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act to the fixed amounts prescribed in the Second Schedule.

civil appeal_allowed Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 163-A Section 166 Second Schedule