Delhi High Court

92,628 judgments

Year:

Yogesh Kumar & Ors. v. State

04 Mar 2014 · V.K. Jain · 2014:DHC:1160

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the husband for dowry death under Sections 304B and 498A IPC while acquitting other in-laws due to insufficient evidence, reducing the husband's sentence from 10 to 7 years.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dowry death Section 304B IPC Section 498A IPC cruelty

M/S JACONDE OVERSEAS PVT. LTD. v. HALLAX APPLIED POWER PVT.LTD

04 Mar 2014 · V.K. Shali · 2014:DHC:1188

The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff's appeal against closure of evidence for non-payment of costs, holding that actual payment with receipts on record precludes such closure and granted one final opportunity to complete evidence.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 35B CPC costs closure of evidence affidavit evidence

Union of India v. M/S Gupta Construction Co and Anr.

04 Mar 2014 · Manmohan Singh · 2014:DHC:1184

The Delhi High Court allowed condonation of delay in re-filing objections under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 when the original petition was timely filed but returned for lack of pecuniary jurisdiction.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 condonation of delay pecuniary jurisdiction

Sanjeev Mittal v. M/S Tirupati Infraprojects Pvt. Ltd.

04 Mar 2014 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2014:DHC:1181

The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for injunction enforcing an exclusive liquor vending right in a mall, holding such agreements void as restraint of trade and unenforceable against third-party transferees under property and competition laws.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant exclusive no objection certificate restraint of trade transfer of property injunction

DSOI v. Employees’ Provident Fund Organization

04 Mar 2014 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2014:DHC:1182

The Delhi High Court upheld that casual laborers are covered under the Employees’ Provident Fund Act from their date of joining, dismissing the petitioner’s challenge to provident fund contributions liability.

labor petition_dismissed Significant Employees’ Provident Fund Act casual laborers definition of employee provident fund contributions

Kailash Chand v. Defence Service Officers Institute

04 Mar 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:1179

The Delhi High Court held that a licensee cannot claim injunction to protect possession after licence termination and dismissed the second appeal against concurrent judgments refusing such relief.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant licensee injunction licence deed possession

Mokul International Ltd. & Anr. v. Veena Paintal

04 Mar 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:1187

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the open unbuilt area was not transferred under the Agreement to Sell and upheld the decree granting mandatory and permanent injunctions with mesne profits in favor of the plaintiff.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant mandatory injunction permanent injunction mesne profits Agreement to Sell

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Pushpa Devi & Ors.

04 Mar 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:1186

The Delhi High Court held that death due to heart failure accelerated by employment-related strain qualifies as an accident under the Employee’s Compensation Act, dismissing the insurer's appeal and upholding compensation to the deceased's dependants.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923 accident death due to heart failure strain and stress

The Coca-Cola Company & Anr v. K.M Salim

04 Mar 2014 · Manmohan Singh · 2014:DHC:1166

The Delhi High Court held that the Defendant infringed the Plaintiffs' well-known trademarks SPRITE and THUMS UP, their copyright in labels, and committed passing off, granting permanent injunction and damages in favor of the Plaintiffs.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement copyright infringement passing off unfair competition

ION EXCHANGE (INDIA) LTD. v. PANASONIC ELECTRIC WORKS CO. LTD.

04 Mar 2014 · BADAR DURREZ AHMED, ACJ; CHIEF JUSTICE; SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J · 2014:DHC:1177-DB

The Delhi High Court held that courts at the agreed seat of arbitration have territorial jurisdiction to entertain Section 9 petitions under the Arbitration Act, 1996, even if the cause of action arose elsewhere and parties reside outside Delhi.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 9 territorial jurisdiction seat of arbitration

Amit Kumar Chopra v. Narain Cold Storage & Allied Industries Pvt. Ltd & Others

04 Mar 2014 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2014:DHC:1176
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Plaintiff's application for decree on admissions under Order XII Rule 6 CPC for refund of Security Deposit, holding that the Defendants' plea of forfeiture and breach raised factual disputes precluding summary judgment.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Order XII Rule 6 CPC judgment on admissions Security Deposit forfeiture

Shri Nabi Khan & Anr. v. Shri Haji Gyasuddin

04 Mar 2014 · Manmohan Singh · 2014:DHC:1171

The Delhi High Court held that the Rent Controller has no power to condone even a one-day delay in filing leave to defend under Section 25B of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, upholding the eviction order but granted the tenant two years to vacate the premises.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 25B leave to defend eviction

K.C Sethi v. Bishambar Nath Batra

04 Mar 2014 · G.S. Sistani · 2014:DHC:1191

The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit as infructuous, holding that a comprehensive settlement between parties extinguished the cause of action in the pending civil dispute.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant settlement cause of action collaboration agreement arbitration

Shakeel Ahmad v. State

04 Mar 2014 · S.P. Garg · 2014:DHC:1164

The High Court of Delhi allowed Shakeel Ahmad's criminal appeal by adopting the reasoning in a contemporaneously delivered common judgment in a related case.

criminal appeal_allowed Procedural criminal appeal High Court of Delhi appeal allowed common judgment

Kancho Devi v. Saurabh Srivastava

04 Mar 2014 · Manmohan Singh · 2014:DHC:1168

The Delhi High Court held that the Rent Controller has no power to condone delay in filing leave to defend applications beyond 15 days under Section 25-B(4) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, upholding eviction but granted the tenant reasonable time to vacate.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 25-B(4) leave to defend condonation of delay

Jodhpal v. State

04 Mar 2014 · Kailash Gambhir; Sunita Gupta · 2014:DHC:1185-DB

The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of murder and evidence concealment charges due to unreliable child witness testimony, unexplained FIR delay, inconclusive medical evidence, and flawed investigation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant child witness testimony delay in FIR weapon of offence homicidal death

AMCO BATTERIES LTD v. COMMISSIONER OF VALUE ADDED TAX

04 Mar 2014 · S. RAVINDRA BHAT; R. V. EASWAR · 2014:DHC:1169-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the Objection Hearing Authority cannot impose interest under Section 74(7) of the Delhi VAT Act without proper verification and acceptance of the dealer’s contentions, setting aside the direction for interest recovery as premature.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 Section 74(7) interest recovery Objection Hearing Authority

Shyamal Prasad Das v. Anita Verma

04 Mar 2014 · Manmohan Singh · 2014:DHC:1170

The Delhi High Court held that the Rent Controller has no jurisdiction to condone delay beyond 15 days in filing leave to defend under Section 25-B(4) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, and upheld the eviction order while granting the tenant one year to vacate the premises.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 25-B(4) leave to defend eviction

Neelam Devi & Ors. v. Bikramjeet Singh & Ors.

04 Mar 2014 · Suresh Kait · 2014:DHC:1172

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a death claim by recognizing the deceased as a skilled worker and increasing non-pecuniary damages in line with Supreme Court precedents.

civil appeal_allowed Significant compensation loss of dependency Minimum Wages Act, 1948 skilled worker

Santosh @ Santosh Sav v. Gopal Singh & Ors.

04 Mar 2014 · Suresh Kait · 2014:DHC:1175

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for a young disabled rickshaw puller by adding future prospects and awarding damages for disfigurement and loss of marriage prospects, setting a precedent on assessing compensation in motor accident claims.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident compensation future prospects permanent disability loss of disfigurement