Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
THDC India Ltd v. R.K. Raturi
The Delhi High Court held that disclosure of DPC proceedings involving third party information requires compliance with RTI Act’s exemption and procedural safeguards, while an employee is entitled to access his own ACR with necessary redactions.
Dena Bank v. AAIFR & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that proceedings before BIFR abate upon possession taken under Section 13(4) of SARFAESI with consent of secured creditors representing three-fourths of debt, notwithstanding interim stays by DRT.
Ahmed Sikander v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking parole for a life convict who had previously violated parole conditions and was involved in further crimes, holding that parole rejection was justified and lawful.
Shiela Sen Gupta v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the CBDT circular permitting negotiations for government property disposal only with PSUs and government departments, rejecting a tenant’s challenge of discrimination and affirming government discretion in property disposal under Chapter XX-C of the Income Tax Act.
Avikash v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that repeated loss or damage of Passport without malafide intent does not justify denial of Passport, affirming the Fundamental Right to travel abroad under Article 21.
Commissioner of Customs v. Ginni International Ltd.
The Delhi High Court allowed the Customs Commissioner’s appeal, holding that claiming DTA benefits post conversion from EOU requires proper verification and documentary evidence existing at export time, and remitted the matter for reconsideration.
Charanjeet Singh Rekhi v. Harish Ahuja
The Delhi High Court held that persons claiming to be the original parties disputing identity must be impleaded in suits for specific performance under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC for effective adjudication, setting aside the dismissal of their impleadment applications.
Charanjeet Singh Rekhi v. Harish Ahuja
The Delhi High Court held that in a suit for specific performance, persons claiming to be the original parties or their successors may be impleaded under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC to resolve disputes over identity, remanding the matter for fresh consideration.
Mithlesh Kumar Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking investigation into alleged railway scams, holding that repeated litigation on matters already investigated by the CBI and accepted by authorities is impermissible without exhausting statutory remedies.
Deepender Kumar @ Chhotu v. The State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under NDPS Act despite a fifteen-day delay in sending narcotic samples to the FSL, holding that intact seals and credible police evidence suffice to prove possession beyond reasonable doubt.
Bimla Devi & Anr. v. State
The Delhi High Court acquitted appellants convicted of murder due to failure of prosecution to establish a complete chain of incriminating circumstances beyond reasonable doubt.
Darshan v. Raj Kumar & Others
The Delhi High Court set aside probate granted for a Will due to failure to prove proper execution and attestation as required under Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.
Virtus Dordrecht B.V. & Anr. v. Vikram Bhargava & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit for recovery and declaration due to plaintiffs' failure to prove the joint venture, remittances, and compliance with foreign exchange laws restricting land acquisition by foreign entities.
Charanjeet Singh Rekhi v. Harish Ahuja
The Delhi High Court held that persons claiming to be the original parties to a contract in a suit for specific performance disputing the defendants' identity can be impleaded as necessary parties under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC for effective adjudication.
Mitsubishi Corporation India Pvt. Ltd. v. Additional Commissioner of Income Tax
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's characterization of the appellant's international transactions as trading activities for transfer pricing, dismissing the appeal and affirming the application of appropriate comparables based on functional and risk profiles.
M/S BDR BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD v. SHRI SHYAM LAL ARORA
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for specific performance of a property sale agreement, holding no representation of commercial use was made, the plaintiff was not ready and willing to perform, and the defendant was entitled to forfeit the earnest money.
Paramjit Singh v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Paramjit Singh for attempted murder under Sections 307/34 IPC, modifying the sentence from three to two years imprisonment based on credible evidence and mitigating circumstances.
Man Singh Tusaria v. J M Financial Asset Reconstruction Co. Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that a securitization company acquiring financial assets under the SARFAESI Act can be substituted as complainant in pending NI Act proceedings relating to assigned loans.
DELHI STATE INDUSTRIAL & INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD v. M/S RAMA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY THR ITS PARTNER R.N. GUPTA
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award granting loss of profit, holding that courts cannot interfere under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act merely on grounds of erroneous appreciation of facts or law.
The New India Assurance Co Ltd v. Shweta & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal, upholding the compensation awarded with 50% future prospects addition and rejecting contributory negligence in a motor accident claim.