Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
Commissioner of Income Tax-III v. Dimension Apparels Pvt. Ltd.
Delhi High Court decided multiple income tax appeals filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax against Dimension Apparels Pvt. Ltd. on July 8, 2014, referring to a related judgment for detailed reasoning.
Commissioner of Income Tax-III v. Dimension Apparels Pvt. Ltd.
Delhi High Court decided multiple income tax appeals filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax against Dimension Apparels Pvt. Ltd. on July 8, 2014, referencing a related detailed judgment in ITA 327/2014.
Commissioner of Income Tax-III v. Dimension Apparels Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court heard multiple income tax appeals filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax against Dimension Apparels Pvt. Ltd., referencing a related decision for detailed reasoning.
Commissioner of Income Tax-III v. Dimension Apparels Pvt. Ltd.
Assessment orders passed against a company dissolved by amalgamation are invalid and cannot be cured as procedural defects; assessments must be made on the successor company under the Income Tax Act.
Idrish v. The State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) NDPS Act for possession of charas but modified the default sentence for non-payment of fine considering the appellant's poor economic condition.
Umed Singh & Ors. v. The State, N.C.T. of Delhi
The Delhi High Court acquitted appellants in a dowry death case due to lack of cogent and corroborated evidence proving cruelty or harassment leading to the victim's suicide.
Shri Lakshmi Narayan B v. International Orthopedic Rehabilitation & Prevention (India) Pvt. Ltd & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that a private employment contract terminable by notice cannot be enforced by injunction to continue employment, limiting the remedy for wrongful termination to damages.
BHAGWATI & ORS v. SHER SINGH & ORS
The Delhi High Court held that a suit for permanent injunction regarding agricultural land is maintainable in civil court and not barred by Section 185 of the Delhi Land Reforms Act, dismissing the defendants' applications for rejection of the plaint.
Prabhat Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for kidnapping for ransom under Section 364A IPC, affirming that the prosecution proved the offence and criminal conspiracy beyond reasonable doubt despite minor contradictions.
Allahabad Bank v. Rajan Malhotra
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bank's review petition challenging the dismissal of its appeal for reinstatement of an employee, holding that issues not raised in the original appeal cannot be introduced at the review stage.
Delhi Transport Corporation v. Jasbir Singh Tokas
The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal, affirming that an employee completing 20 years of service and giving three months' notice is automatically entitled to voluntary retirement under CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972.
Mohan Pal Singh v. Union of India
The High Court dismissed the second appeal, holding that without a certificate from a Government Doctor of civil surgeon rank, the appellant could not validly challenge the Medical Board's findings and claim reinstatement in service.
Sunil Kumar v. State
The High Court of Delhi dismissed Sunil Kumar's criminal appeal by referring to a detailed common judgment delivered in a related case.
Rajiv @ Raj v. State; Sunil Kumar v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence of two appellants for attempted murder under Section 307/34 IPC based on consistent ocular and medical evidence and rejected their claims of false implication.
Surinder Singh @ Raja v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence of six appellants for gang rape under Section 376(g) IPC, affirming the prosecutrix's credible testimony corroborated by medical and forensic evidence despite absence of TIP and minor contradictions.
Surinder Singh @ Raja v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence of six appellants for gang rape under Section 376(g) IPC, affirming that credible prosecutrix testimony corroborated by medical and forensic evidence suffices to prove forcible sexual assault even without a Test Identification Parade.
Surinder Singh @ Raja v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence of six appellants for gang rape under Section 376(g) IPC based on consistent prosecutrix testimony corroborated by medical and forensic evidence.
Surinder Singh @ Raja v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence of six appellants for gang rape under Section 376(g) IPC based on credible prosecutrix testimony corroborated by medical and forensic evidence, rejecting claims of consent and procedural lapses.
Surinder Singh @ Raja v. State
Delhi High Court upheld convictions under Section 376(g) IPC for gang rape, affirming that consistent prosecutrix testimony corroborated by medical and forensic evidence suffices even without a Test Identification Parade.
Butna Devi v. Amit Talwar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the amendment of the written statement to include a counterclaim for possession and balance sale consideration, and held that a suit seeking declaration of a registered sale deed as void for non-payment of consideration is not maintainable.