Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
National Textile Corporation Ltd. v. UOI & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition by UCO Bank for impermissibly seeking to reargue the appeal on new grounds without any error apparent on the face of the record.
Navalokam Samskarika Kendram v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL filed by a third party challenging the denial of the Arjuna Award and doping-related suspension of an athlete, holding that personal grievances cannot be agitated through PILs without the aggrieved individual's participation.
Dr. Madan Mohan Luthra v. Santosh Rani
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of a tenant on the ground of the landlord's bonafide residential requirement supported by medical evidence, dismissing tenant's challenge to the eviction order.
M/s Globe Motors Ltd. v. Official Liquidator
The Delhi High Court allowed the Official Liquidator's application to dissolve M/s Globe Motors Limited under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956, discharging the Liquidator and authorizing transfer of undisbursed dividends to the Reserve Bank of India.
Greenview Sales Pvt Ltd & Ors v. Harcomp Airflex Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Amalgamation under sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956, dispensing with a separate petition for capital reduction and clarifying compliance requirements with RBI and tax authorities.
A J Management Info Services Pvt Ltd v. Wonder Infrabuild Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Amalgamation under sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956 involving Core Investment Companies, confirming vesting of assets and dissolution of transferor companies without winding up.
Trans Valves (India) Private Limited v. TVL Engineers Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Arrangement between Trans Valves (India) Private Limited and TVL Engineers Private Limited under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 after ensuring all procedural and statutory compliances were met.
ASM Merchandisers Private Limited v. Ikta Aromatics Limited
The Delhi High Court approved a Scheme of Amalgamation under sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956, dispensing with meetings of shareholders and creditors based on their written consents.
Yogesh Aggarwal v. Vikas Goyal
The Delhi High Court held that forfeiture of earnest money under a contract is not permissible without pleading and proving actual loss, and decreed recovery of Rs. 45.0 lacs paid by the plaintiffs.
Stork Phobos Electricals Pvt. Ltd. v. Stork Rubber Products Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court allowed the first motion application approving a Scheme of Amalgamation between two companies by dispensing with meetings of shareholders and creditors based on their written consents under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956.
Raj Kumar Varun v. Central Bureau of Investigation
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of a public servant for demanding and accepting bribe under the Prevention of Corruption Act, emphasizing that failure to prove conspiracy does not negate individual guilt and that presumption under Section 20 PC Act applies upon recovery of tainted money.
Indo Rolhard Industries Ltd. v. M. K. Mahajan & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed Company Appeal No. 26 of 2014, relying on the reasoning in a related appeal, thereby upholding the impugned order and disposing of connected applications.
Indo Rolhard Industries Ltd. v. M. K. Mahajan & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the winding up petition admission and directions for advertisement and appointment of Provisional Liquidator, emphasizing the necessity of procedural fairness and the company's opportunity to seek dispensation under Rule 9 before advertisement.
Union of India v. Gulam Mohd. Farooque
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of an NRI for concealing undeclared gold at the airport, emphasizing the evidentiary value of the customs declaration form and rejecting claims of false implication.
Rakesh Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an employee denied financial upgradation under the ACP Scheme due to the employer's failure to provide mandatory promotional training must be granted benefits from the date of eligibility, quashing contradictory departmental orders.
Randhir Singh & Others v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that employees are entitled to 2nd financial upgradation under the ACP Scheme from completion of 24 years of service despite non-completion of pre-promotional course due to employer's failure, quashing contradictory government orders denying such benefits.
Balaram Kispotta & Another v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that employees denied financial upgradation under the ACP Scheme due to employer's failure to detail them for a mandatory course are entitled to benefits from the date of completion of 24 years of service.
Ankur Chhibber v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that an employee denied financial upgradation under the ACP Scheme due to administrative failure to detail him for a promotional course is entitled to benefits from the date of completion of requisite service.
Inder Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed land acquisition appeals filed after inordinate delay, holding that ignorance of law and reliance on erroneous legal advice do not constitute sufficient cause for condonation of delay under the Limitation Act.
M/S National Highways Authority of India v. M/S HCC Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award granting additional costs and loss of profit for contract delays, affirming the tribunal's interpretation of contract clauses and limiting judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.