Delhi High Court

92,849 judgments

Year:

Directorate of Revenue Intelligence v. Mike Chimezie

09 Sep 2014 · Ved Prakash Vaish · 2014:DHC:4513

The Delhi High Court held that re-testing of seized narcotic substances under the NDPS Act is not permissible except in extremely exceptional circumstances with cogent reasons, setting aside the trial court’s order allowing re-testing after four years.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act re-testing re-sampling seized narcotic substances

Directorate of Revenue Intelligence v. Anselen Lyke Nwosu

09 Sep 2014 · Ved Prakash Vaish · 2014:DHC:4512

The Delhi High Court held that re-testing of seized narcotic samples under the NDPS Act is not permissible as a matter of right and can only be allowed in exceptional circumstances with cogent reasons, setting aside the trial court's order permitting re-testing after a long delay.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act re-testing re-sampling contraband

M/S DELHI TRAVELS & TOURS v. EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION

09 Sep 2014 · SURESH KAIT, J. · 2014:DHC:4504

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging ESIC’s refusal to consider the petitioner’s case under the Amnesty Scheme due to non-production of records and upheld the demand for payment.

administrative petition_dismissed Employees State Insurance Corporation New Amnesty Scheme-2014 production of records pre-condition deposit

DTC v. Mohinder Singh

09 Sep 2014 · Suresh Kait, J. · 2014:DHC:4505
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The High Court upheld the Labour Court's order reinstating a dismissed conductor due to insufficient evidence of misconduct and a fair domestic inquiry.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant domestic inquiry natural justice misconduct loss of confidence

Shyam Sunder Wadhawan v. Vivek Arya

09 Sep 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:4506
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that summons service by registered post returned unclaimed and affixation following tenant's refusal constitute valid service under Section 25-B of the Delhi Rent Control Act, dismissing the tenant's challenge to eviction on grounds of improper service.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 25-B bona fide necessity service of summons

Shri Suraj Bhan v. Shri Vijay Prakash Bhardwaj

09 Sep 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:4509

The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a tenant's application to recall an eviction decree due to failure to file the leave to defend application in time, reaffirming that delay cannot be condoned and procedural grounds cannot be raised collaterally.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 leave to defend application bonafide necessity eviction delay condonation

Sangeeta v. Anita Arora

09 Sep 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:4508

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition under Article 227, holding that the tenant must pay rent for the period of unlawful occupation after a decree for possession, and that extraordinary jurisdiction is not to be exercised routinely.

civil petition_dismissed Article 227 Constitution of India Code of Civil Procedure 1908 possession decree mesne profits

Commissioner of Income Tax-Delhi v. Subhash Chand Rastogi

09 Sep 2014 · Sanjiv Khanna; V. Kameswar Rao · 2014:DHC:4524-DB

The Delhi High Court remanded the issue of whether exported Zinc Oxide qualifies as a mineral under Section 80HHC for deduction eligibility, setting aside the Tribunal’s order for failure to consider this crucial question of fact.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 80HHC Income Tax Act 1961 export deduction Zinc Oxide

Firoz Ali & Anr. v. The State & Anr.

09 Sep 2014 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2014:DHC:4529

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498-A IPC

Jagbir v. The State & Anr.

09 Sep 2014 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2014:DHC:4526

The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial disputes Section 498A IPC

Javed Ali & Ors. v. State & Anr.

09 Sep 2014 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2014:DHC:4527

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from matrimonial disputes under Sections 406 and 498-A IPC on the ground of an amicable settlement and divorce between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute non-compoundable offence

Manish Jain & Ors. v. The State & Anr.

09 Sep 2014 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2014:DHC:4525

The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable criminal proceeding arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, emphasizing the inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR matrimonial disputes non-compoundable offences

SHRI RAM COLLEGE OF COMMERCE v. SUNNY GOEL & ORS.

09 Sep 2014 · CHIEF JUSTICE; RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW · 2014:DHC:4498-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the direction to admit a student based on increased re-evaluated marks before the University's last cut-off date, emphasizing that re-evaluation results must have practical effect and cannot be rendered futile.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant re-evaluation admission cut-off supernumerary seats University of Delhi

Arshad Ali v. State & Ors.

09 Sep 2014 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2014:DHC:4528

The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR and criminal proceedings under Sections 279 and 304-A IPC on the ground of an amicable settlement between the petitioner and the deceased's legal representatives, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR non-compoundable offence amicable settlement

Hameeda Begum & Ors. v. National Insurance Company Ltd & Ors.

09 Sep 2014 · Jayant Nath · 2014:DHC:4532

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by applying the correct multiplier based on the deceased's age and upheld inclusion of special allowance and future prospects in income computation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant loss of dependency multiplier personal expenses deduction special allowance

Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Harender Singh & Ors.

09 Sep 2014 · Jayant Nath · 2014:DHC:4537

The Delhi High Court upheld the tribunal's compensation award in a motor accident claim, affirming the assessment of income at Rs.15,000/- per month and a 50% addition for future prospects for a self-employed deceased under 40 years.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant motor accident claim compensation loss of dependency future prospects

Sunita Chauhan @ Gayatri Devi v. Virender Singh Gusain

08 Sep 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:4475

The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition under Article 227 challenging the dismissal of Deposit of Rent petitions filed beyond limitation and held that such petitions post eviction decree are mala fide and not to be routinely restored.

civil petition_dismissed Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Deposit of Rent petition Section 27 Section 28 limitation

Resident Welfare Association v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation

08 Sep 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:4476

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the impleadment of a contra resident welfare association in a suit over community hall rights, holding such impleadment permissible under Order I Rule 10 CPC.

civil petition_dismissed Resident Welfare Association Community Hall Impleadment Order I Rule 10 CPC

M/S Sanya Industries India Private Limited v. Sanya Fibre Private Limited

08 Sep 2014 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2014:DHC:4471

The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between two companies under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, after finding no objections or prejudice, allowing transfer of assets and dissolution of the Transferor Company without winding up.

corporate petition_allowed Scheme of Amalgamation Companies Act 1956 Sections 391 to 394 Official Liquidator

State v. Parvez Ahmed Radoo

08 Sep 2014 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2014:DHC:4483-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal and upheld the acquittal of the accused due to contradictions and procedural deficiencies in the prosecution's case regarding possession of explosives and hawala money linked to terrorism.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Explosives Act, 1884 Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act possession of explosives hawala money