Delhi High Court
92,849 judgments
Vijay @ Monti v. State GNCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of appellants for kidnapping and murder based on circumstantial and forensic evidence, allowing substitution of Section 34 IPC for Section 120B IPC charges, while moderating sentences in default of fine.
M/S MIRKANA ENGINEERING PVT LTD v. MR EINO S MEHTA & ANR
The Delhi High Court held that a tenant is not entitled to suspend rent payment during municipal sealing of leased premises when the lease deed imposes unconditional rent liability and no equitable grounds are pleaded.
M/S MIRKANA ENGINEERING PVT LTD v. MR EINO S MEHTA & ANR
The Delhi High Court held that a tenant is not entitled to suspend rent payment during municipal sealing of leased premises where the lease imposes unconditional rent liability and no equity is pleaded.
Vijay @ Santy v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Vijay @ Santy for murder based on consistent eyewitness and medical evidence, rejecting challenges on place of occurrence and procedural grounds.
M/S R.D GOEL & CO PVT LTD v. M/S OK PLAY INDIA LTD
The Delhi High Court granted conditional leave to defend in a summary suit under Order XXXVII CPC upon deposit of Rs. 12 lakhs, holding that the defendant raised triable issues requiring trial.
Bharti Airtel Ltd v. Airtelasia & Ors
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction to Bharti Airtel Ltd against defendants using the deceptively similar mark "AIRTELASIA" and domain name, holding it to be trademark infringement, passing off, and ordered transfer of the domain name.
Praveen Kumar v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 498-A IPC arising from matrimonial disputes on the ground of an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Paramjeet v. State of NCT Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under the Indian Electricity (Amendment) Act and IPC on the ground of settlement and full payment, relying on its inherent powers to quash non-compoundable offences where the complainant is no longer interested in prosecution.
Lord Buddha Shiksha Pratisthan Saharsa v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition of a medical college seeking renewal of admission permission, holding that serious deficiencies and failure to meet statutory requirements justified denial of renewal and no interim relief could be granted.
State v. Intezar & Anr.
The Delhi High Court convicted a TSR driver for rash and negligent driving causing death but released him on probation and directed victim compensation under statutory schemes, balancing deterrence with individual circumstances.
Triveni Engineering & Industries Ltd v. Union Bank of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a borrower who has settled disputed claims with a bank and obtained a decree against it cannot be classified as a defaulter without notice, and ordered removal of the petitioner’s name from the CIBIL defaulter list.
Deepak Khosla v. Nemo
The Delhi High Court held that letters patent appeals are not maintainable against interlocutory orders in contempt proceedings or against single judge orders under Section 10-F of the Companies Act, dismissing the appellant's challenges as lacking jurisdiction.
Deepak Khosla v. Nemo
The Delhi High Court dismissed letters patent appeals challenging orders in contempt and company law proceedings, holding such appeals non-maintainable under the Contempt of Courts Act and Companies Act, 1956.
JENSON AND NICHOLSON (I) LTD v. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS AND ANR
The Delhi High Court held it has jurisdiction to entertain the writ petition and set aside the IPAB order refusing condonation of delay, remitting the appeal for decision on merits.
Bhoop Singh @ Pappu v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence of the appellant for possession of commercial quantity of Charas under the NDPS Act, affirming procedural compliance and rejecting claims of false implication.
Kamal @ Ram Singh & Anr. v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Kamal for setting fire causing death but acquitted Guddi due to lack of corroboration, emphasizing the need for consistent eyewitness evidence to sustain criminal liability.
State of NCT of Delhi v. Parveen Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal and upheld the acquittal of accused due to insufficient circumstantial evidence and failure to link the recovered firearm to the murder weapon.
SU-KAM POWER SYSTMS LTD v. M/S UNIWORLD TELECOM LIMITED & ORS
The Delhi High Court decreed a recovery suit for Rs. 80,80,086 in favor of the plaintiff under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC due to defendants' failure to file a written statement.
Vashishta Gakhar v. Sanjay Chawla
The Delhi High Court dismissed the defendant's leave to defend in a summary suit for recovery of Rs.22,90,722 based on undisputed documentary evidence and granted a decree in favor of the plaintiff with interest.
Robin @ Bablu v. State of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Robin @ Bablu for murder based on a credible dying declaration corroborated by medical and circumstantial evidence, dismissing his appeal.