Delhi High Court

92,849 judgments

Year:

Smt. Draupadi Devi v. Gulshan Kumar Anand

09 Sep 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:4514

The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of a tenant on landlord's bonafide necessity grounds under the Delhi Rent Control Act, rejecting late-filed defenses and emphasizing landlords' right to relocate business to suitable premises.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 bonafide necessity eviction petition leave to defend application

Dr. Sarla Gupta v. GNCT of Delhi & Ors.

09 Sep 2014 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Vipin Sanghi · 2014:DHC:4515-DB

The Delhi High Court delivered a judgment on writ petitions filed by Dr. Sarla Gupta and others against GNCTD and other respondents on 09.09.2014.

other other Writ Petition Delhi High Court Government of NCT of Delhi Administrative Law

Dr. Mrs. Sapna Channa & Ors. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

09 Sep 2014 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Vipin Sanghi · 2014:DHC:4516-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the denial of permanent absorption to deputationist General Duty Medical Officers under the Delhi Health Service Rules, holding that the power of relaxation cannot be used to introduce new recruitment modes absent statutory provision.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant deputation permanent absorption Delhi Health Service Rules 2009 Rule 8

Tarsem Lal v. UOI & Ors.

09 Sep 2014 · S. RAVINDRA BHAT; VIPIN SANGHI · 2014:DHC:4521-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal’s dismissal of a petition challenging non-inclusion in the CSS Directors Suitability List, holding that suitability, not seniority, governs such appointments under uniform ACC-approved criteria.

administrative petition_dismissed Central Secretariat Service Directors Suitability List Central Establishment Board Annual Confidential Reports

Shanawaz Khan v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Others

09 Sep 2014 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; Siddharth Mridul · 2014:DHC:4495-DB

Delhi High Court held that e-rickshaws are motor vehicles under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and their unregistered operation is illegal, directing authorities to prevent their plying until lawful regulation is enacted.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant e-rickshaw Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 motor vehicle definition

Krishan Kumar @ Monu v. State

09 Sep 2014 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2014:DHC:4496-DB

The Delhi High Court modified the appellants' conviction from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Exception 1 to Section 300 IPC, sentencing them to ten years' rigorous imprisonment considering sudden and grave provocation.

criminal sentence_modified Significant murder culpable homicide not amounting to murder Exception 1 to Section 300 IPC provocation

LT FOODS LTD. v. SACHDEVA & SONS RICE MILLS LTD.

09 Sep 2014 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2014:DHC:4497-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the permissibility of amending a written statement to include a new defense that a trademark is generic, emphasizing a liberal approach to amendments under Order VI Rule 17 CPC.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VI Rule 17 CPC amendment of written statement trademark infringement generic trademark

Rajesh Yadav v. Shree Pal

09 Sep 2014 · Jayant Nath · 2014:DHC:4535

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by increasing future prospects and loss of love and affection while upholding income assessment based on minimum wages due to lack of proof of actual earnings.

civil appeal_allowed Significant compensation enhancement motor accident claim loss of dependency future prospects

KRISHNA KUMARI v. SUNIL KUMAR GOEL AND ANR

09 Sep 2014 · Manmohan Singh · 2014:DHC:4499

The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's application for decree on admissions under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC in a lease dispute, holding that disputed facts and legal issues require a full trial.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order 12 Rule 6 CPC Lease termination Possession suit Admission of facts

World One Solutions Private Limited v. Official Liquidator

09 Sep 2014 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2014:DHC:4500

The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Composite Scheme of Arrangement involving demerger and amalgamation among group companies under sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956, overruling objections on valuation and statutory compliance upon undertakings by the petitioners.

corporate petition_allowed Significant Composite Scheme of Arrangement Companies Act 1956 Amalgamation Demerger

Shubh Sponge Iron Private Limited and Ors. v. Regional Director and Official Liquidator

09 Sep 2014 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2014:DHC:4501

The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Arrangement for amalgamation of multiple companies under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956, after ensuring statutory compliance and addressing regulatory concerns.

corporate petition_allowed Scheme of Arrangement Amalgamation Companies Act 1956 FEMA compliance

Om Kumari v. Sanjeev Kumar Kapoor & Ors.

09 Sep 2014 · G. S. Sistani · 2014:DHC:4533

The Delhi High Court granted a decree on admission under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC in favor of the plaintiff mother claiming ownership of a flat, rejecting defendants' baseless oral claims and ordering their vacation within six months with protective measures.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order 12 Rule 6 CPC decree on admission registered agreement to sell ownership dispute

Indu Nagpal & Anr. v. Surinder Mohan Bhandari

09 Sep 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:4530

The Delhi High Court dismissed tenants' petition challenging eviction on bonafide necessity grounds due to lack of documentary proof of an alleged agreement to sell and upheld the eviction order.

property appeal_dismissed bonafide necessity eviction Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 leave to defend agreement to sell

Neeraj Biala v. The Kingfisher Airlines Ltd.

09 Sep 2014 · G. S. Sistani · 2014:DHC:4536

Delhi High Court held that where salary arrears are undisputed, the dispute is not referable to arbitration and the court has jurisdiction despite an exclusive Mumbai jurisdiction clause, dismissing defendant's leave to defend application under Order 37 CPC.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant territorial jurisdiction arbitration clause Order 37 CPC leave to defend

Ex-Swr Girdhari Lal Yadav v. Union of India

09 Sep 2014 · Kailash Gambhir; Najmi Waziri · 2014:DHC:4531-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging Summary Court Martial proceedings and upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's order, holding that procedural safeguards were complied with and delay barred relief.

administrative petition_dismissed Summary Court Martial Army Rule 115(2) Article 226 plea of guilty

CIT v. Central News Agency Pvt Ltd

09 Sep 2014 · Sanjiv Khanna; V. Kameswar Rao · 2014:DHC:4503-DB

The Delhi High Court remanded for fresh adjudication the issue whether income from sale of mutual fund units is capital gains or business income, emphasizing application of tests from Rewashanker A. Kothari and consideration of all relevant facts.

tax appeal_allowed Significant capital gains business income mutual funds investment vs trading

Razia Begum v. Delhi Development Authority

09 Sep 2014 · Gita Mittal; Sunil Gaur · 2014:DHC:4507-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld dismissal of a suit for declaration and possession as barred by limitation under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC, emphasizing that the plaint and documents showed the suit was time-barred despite the appellant's claim of delayed knowledge.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC Limitation Act 1963 declaration suit possession suit

Delhi Development Authority v. S.P. Singh

09 Sep 2014 · S. RAVINDRA BHAT; VIPIN SANGHI · 2014:DHC:4511-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a public servant subjected to minor penalties can only claim promotion and seniority after the penalty period expires, setting aside the CAT's order restoring seniority from an earlier invalid promotion date.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant promotion seniority minor penalty disciplinary proceedings

Parveen Bhargava v. Jagdish Chander

09 Sep 2014 · G. S. Sistani · 2014:DHC:4534

The Delhi High Court allowed amendment of the plaint to specifically aver readiness and willingness to perform the contract, holding that such averment need be clear in substance and can be amended at an early stage to meet the requirements of Section 16 of the Specific Relief Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance readiness and willingness amendment of plaint Order 6 Rule 17 CPC

Chahat Ram Verma v. Unitech Ltd. & Anr.

09 Sep 2014 · Vibhu Bakhru, J · 2014:DHC:4510

The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court’s award rejecting the petitioner’s claim for promotion and wages as Assistant Store Keeper, holding the issue barred by res judicata and affirming the Labour Court’s factual findings.

labor petition_dismissed Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Labour Court res judicata promotion