Delhi High Court

92,849 judgments

Year:

North Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Mordwaj and Ors.

10 Sep 2014 · Suresh Kait · 2014:DHC:4560

The Delhi High Court held that execution proceedings under Section 33(C)(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act cannot adjudicate disputed claims on pay scales not decided by the Industrial Tribunal and quashed a recovery certificate issued beyond the award's scope.

labor petition_allowed Significant Assured Career Progression Scheme Section 33(C)(1) Industrial Disputes Act execution proceedings Industrial Tribunal award

Madhubala Sharma v. M/S Anand Pratyabhoot Vitt Nigam Ltd.

10 Sep 2014 · Gita Mittal; Sunil Gaur · 2014:DHC:4572-DB

The Delhi High Court held that once a creditor's claim in company liquidation is admitted and disbursed, it cannot be reopened without notice and opportunity, setting aside the order directing refund of amounts recovered without following natural justice.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant company liquidation official liquidator creditor claims natural justice

Vinod Vashisht v. Suresh Chanchal & Ors.

10 Sep 2014 · Najmi Waziri · 2014:DHC:4540

The Delhi High Court held that affidavits supporting pleadings can be amended under Section 151 CPC to correct errors inconsistent with the substantive Written Statement, dismissing the petition challenging such amendment.

civil petition_dismissed Significant affidavit amendment Section 151 CPC Order VI Rule 15(4) CPC Article 227 Constitution

Gopal Dass Gogia v. Shashi Prabha

10 Sep 2014 · Najmi Waziri · 2014:DHC:4542

The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of a tenant on bona fide requirement grounds under the Delhi Rent Control Act, affirming that foreign citizenship does not bar eviction and tenant hardship is not a defense.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 bona fide requirement eviction foreign citizenship

Tata Motors Ltd. v. Legal Metrology Officer Weights & Measures Department Govt. of NCT of Delhi

10 Sep 2014 · Ved Prakash Vaish · 2014:DHC:4561

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash summons under the Legal Metrology Act, holding that objections must be raised before the trial court at the notice framing stage under Section 251 Cr.P.C., and premature interference under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is unwarranted.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. Section 251 Cr.P.C. Legal Metrology Act, 2009 Packaged Commodities Rules

Gopi Chand v. Sabia Naz

10 Sep 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:4567

The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's revision petition and upheld eviction on bonafide necessity grounds where the landlord had no vacant alternative premises.

property appeal_dismissed Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e) bonafide necessity eviction tenancy rights

Deepak Dass & Ors. v. State & Anr.

10 Sep 2014 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2014:DHC:4563

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes on the ground of amicable settlement and mutual divorce, applying its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial disputes Section 498A IPC

Sewa Ram & Ors. v. State & Anr.

10 Sep 2014 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2014:DHC:4562

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 420 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement between parties, allowing compounding subject to costs.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 420 IPC Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR compounding of offences

Hemlata Nambiar and Ors. v. Kishan Kumar alias Kishan Lal and Ors.

10 Sep 2014 · Jayant Nath, J. · 2014:DHC:4569

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by recognizing credible evidence of the deceased's higher income over minimum wages for loss of dependency calculation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 compensation loss of dependency income assessment

Efacec Switchgear India Pvt. Ltd. v. Official Liquidator

10 Sep 2014 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2014:DHC:4558

The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between two companies under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 after ensuring compliance with statutory requirements and absence of objections.

corporate petition_allowed Scheme of Amalgamation Companies Act 1956 Sections 391 to 394 Official Liquidator

M/S M.M.KNITWEARS PVT LTD v. SARL TEXEUROP

10 Sep 2014 · Manmohan Singh · 2014:DHC:4571

The Delhi High Court allowed transfer of execution proceedings to France under Section 44A CPC for enforcement of an Indian decree against immovable property situated in a foreign reciprocating territory.

civil appeal_allowed Significant execution of decree Section 44A CPC reciprocating territory transfer of execution

Nandini Tewari & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.

10 Sep 2014 · The Chief Justice; Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2014:DHC:4544-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking to ban the film 'Finding Fanny' and delete the word 'Fanny', holding that the word's foreign vulgar meaning does not satisfy the Indian legal test of obscenity and freedom of expression cannot be curtailed on such grounds.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant obscenity test freedom of expression film certification public interest litigation

Arghya Kumar Nath v. Prof. D.S. Rawat & Ors.

09 Sep 2014 · Manmohan J · 2014:DHC:4502

The Delhi High Court held that election disputes during an ongoing election process, including nomination rejections, cannot be challenged by writ petition and must be pursued by election petition after election results are declared.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant writ petition election dispute nomination rejection Article 226

Manoj Kumar v. The Commissioner of Police, Delhi Police and Ors.

09 Sep 2014 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Vipin Sanghi · 2014:DHC:4517-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld cancellation of a candidate's appointment due to a dubious driving license, affirming that employers may rely on licensing authority reports and need not independently verify document validity.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant cancellation of candidature driving license validity public employment administrative tribunal jurisdiction

State v. Ashok Kumar Jain

09 Sep 2014 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2014:DHC:4518-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of Ashok Kumar Jain due to inconsistencies in prosecution evidence and lack of corroboration, dismissing the State's appeal.

criminal appeal_dismissed Acquittal Section 307 IPC Material improvements Non-recovery of weapon

Ram Pal Chauhan v. M/S County Apparels and Others

09 Sep 2014 · G. P. Mittal · 2014:DHC:4519

The Delhi High Court held that the Plaintiff's prior use and goodwill in the unregistered trademark 'DEVIN' entitled him to an injunction against Defendant no. 1's passing off of goods under the same mark.

civil appeal_allowed Significant passing off unregistered trademark trademark proprietorship trade marks act 1999

Narender Kumar Arora v. Reserve Bank of India & Ors.

09 Sep 2014 · Vibhu Bakhru · 2014:DHC:4523

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the assignment of debt on the ground that the dispute is pending before an Arbitral Tribunal and judicial interference under Article 226 is inappropriate at this stage.

civil petition_dismissed Significant assignment of debt Non-Performing Asset Reserve Bank of India Guidelines arbitration

Vinod Kumar Khurana v. University of Delhi

09 Sep 2014 · Manmohan · 2014:DHC:4522

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition holding that a retired teacher is not entitled to submit a Ph.D. thesis under Clause 7 of Ordinance VI-B and emphasized the necessity of enrollment and challenging refusal orders.

academic_administrative petition_dismissed Ph.D. thesis submission University Ordinance VI-B enrollment requirement serving teacher

Krishan Kumar @ Monu v. State

09 Sep 2014 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2014:DHC:4494-DB

The Delhi High Court modified the appellants' conviction from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under grave and sudden provocation, reducing their sentence to ten years' rigorous imprisonment.

criminal sentence_modified Significant murder culpable homicide not amounting to murder grave and sudden provocation Section 300 IPC Exception 1

Shri Suraj Bhan v. Shri Vijay Prakash Bhardwaj

09 Sep 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:4520

The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order under the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding that delay in filing leave to defend cannot be condoned, the tenant cannot challenge a partition deed, and service on the tenant's son was valid.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 leave to defend application bona fide necessity eviction partition deed