Delhi High Court
93,075 judgments
The Associated Chambers of Commerce and Industry of India (ASSOCHAM) v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside service tax orders passed without granting a proper hearing, emphasizing the mandatory nature of natural justice principles.
Pradeep Sharma v. Ms Sangita Jangid
The Delhi High Court upheld the grant of maintenance pendente lite to the respondent, assessing the petitioner’s income based on bank statements rather than his affidavit, and dismissed the petition challenging the order.
Ramesh Kumar v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 307 IPC based on a family settlement and compensation, applying its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC after prima facie assessment of the case.
Deepak Kumar & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties and withdrawal of prosecution support.
Taruna Malik v. The State, Govt NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted probate of a duly executed and unchallenged Will under Section 272 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 to the petitioner for her half share in the inherited property.
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited v. Shri R.P. Doharey
The Delhi High Court set aside the CAT's order modifying the penalty date in a disciplinary case, holding that delay caused by CVC directions did not justify altering the penalty imposed after a fair inquiry.
S.P. Saxena v. The Secretary Ministry of Defence & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that terminal benefits including gratuity cannot be granted to a government employee during the pendency of criminal proceedings, even if stayed, and upheld the CAT's refusal to release such benefits until the trial concludes.
WONDERLAND PROPERTIES PVT LTD v. MOONLIGHT CONTINENTAL PVT LTD & ORS
The Delhi High Court held that a ten-day notice period for dispute under an arbitration clause is discretionary, and arbitration proceedings filed within three years of contract termination are not barred by limitation, allowing the appointment of an arbitrator.
Madhusudan v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that failure to issue the mandatory section 6 notification within the prescribed period causes the land acquisition proceedings to lapse, allowing the writ petition accordingly.
Union of India v. Shashi Aggarwal & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's delayed appeal against compensation awarded under the Land Acquisition Act, holding that delay was not satisfactorily explained and the compensation was justified.
Union of India v. Gaje Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's order granting the third MACP financial upgradation to senior railway employees by applying Clause-5 of the MACP Scheme, preventing pay anomalies between seniors and juniors.
Union of India v. Jai Kumar & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's appeal upholding compensation awarded for land acquisition consistent with precedent and imposed costs.
Union of India v. Shashi Aggarwal & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's appeal, upholding the compensation awarded to respondents for land acquired under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, consistent with prior similar cases.
Union of India v. Ishwar Chand & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's appeal upholding compensation awarded for land acquired under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, consistent with prior similar cases.
Union of India v. Ram Singh & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's appeal upholding compensation awarded for land acquired under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, consistent with prior similar awards.
Union of India v. Dharam Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's appeal, upholding the compensation awarded to respondents for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, at rates consistent with similarly situated persons.
Union of India v. Ramesh Kumar & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's delayed appeal against compensation awarded under the Land Acquisition Act, holding that the delay was not satisfactorily explained and the compensation was lawful.
Union of India v. Jitender Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's appeal as time barred due to unexplained delay and upheld the compensation awarded to respondents for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act.
Union of India v. Sumer Chand & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's delayed appeal against a compensation award under the Land Acquisition Act, upholding the compensation granted to respondents as lawful and consistent with precedent.
Union of India v. Jaiwanti & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's appeal as time barred due to unexplained delay and upheld the compensation awarded for land acquisition under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.