Delhi High Court
93,075 judgments
Khem Chand Ramesh Kumar v. Radhey Shyam Goel; Pradeep Transport Company
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of illegal sub-tenants on landlords' bonafide residential and commercial necessity under the Delhi Rent Control Act, dismissing leave to defend applications.
Sanjay Singh Raghuvanshi v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the repatriation of an NSG commando on medical grounds, holding that standing orders mandating repatriation after two medical boards' LMC findings are binding and lawful.
Capt Vijender Singh Chauhan v. M/S Parsvnath Developers Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that vague denials do not amount to admissions under Order XII Rule 6 CPC and dismissed the plaintiff's application for a partial decree for three months' salary in lieu of notice, as no clear admission by the defendant was established.
TR KURIAKOSE v. BIJI KURIAKOSE
The Delhi High Court allowed restoration of a petition dismissed in default upon proof of non-appearance and directed the trial court to dispose of the matter within three months.
Achey Lal v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of murder and rape charges due to insufficient proof of homicidal death and forcible sexual intercourse beyond reasonable doubt.
Tobir Ahmed v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of two appellants for kidnapping a child for ransom under Section 364A IPC, affirming that ransom demand with threat and recovery of the child proved the offence beyond reasonable doubt.
Ram Murat v. M/S. Dynatech Controls (P) Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's award of compensation for unjustified termination, holding that reinstatement with back wages is not automatic and depends on the circumstances and proof of voluntary resignation.
Tobir Ahmed v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of two appellants for kidnapping a child for ransom under Section 364A IPC, affirming that ransom demand coupled with threat and recovery of the child from accused premises suffices for conviction despite minor evidentiary discrepancies.
Amitava Acharjee v. Kulwant Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld and enhanced compensation awards in multiple motor accident claims, emphasizing proper assessment of disability, loss of earnings, and dependency while dismissing insurance company appeals.
Moni Arora & Ors. v. Yashpal Sehgal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the motor accident claim tribunal's award for failure to consider criminal conviction evidence and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication with opportunity for additional evidence.
SHRI HANS RAJ & ANR v. SHRI AJIT SINGH & ORS
The High Court upheld the trial court's order allowing amendment of plaint to claim enhanced damages, emphasizing a liberal approach to amendments under Order VI Rule 17 CPC and refusing to interfere under Article 227.
Rajrani Garg & Another v. Naveen Garg and Others
The Delhi High Court granted possession to the landlord under Order XII Rule 6 CPC based on admitted non-payment of rent and valid termination of tenancy, emphasizing that vague denials amount to admissions.
Through: Mr. Inder Singh, Advocate v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for land acquired in Village Kotla Mahigram from Rs. 13,547 to Rs. 28,000 per bigha based on Supreme Court precedent ensuring just compensation under the Land Acquisition Act.
Ravindra Krishna v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking allotment of an LIG flat due to petitioner’s failure to respond to demand letters, lack of valid change of address communication, and inordinate delay.
The New India Assurance Company Limited v. Kumari and Others
The Delhi High Court held that an insurer can raise defenses under Section 149 of the Motor Vehicles Act before the executing court and set aside the order directing the insurer to deposit the award amount without adjudicating those defenses.
Through: Mr. Inder Singh, Advocate v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for land acquired in Village Kotla Mahigram from ₹13,547 to ₹28,000 per bigha based on the Supreme Court's precedent, allowing the appeals.
Through: Mr. Inder Singh, Advocate v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR
The Delhi High Court enhanced the compensation for land acquired in Village Kotla Mahigram from ₹13,547 to ₹28,000 per bigha, following the Supreme Court's precedent in Shri Mangla Ram.
Rajbala v. Giri Lal @ Girwar Singh
The High Court held that the 30-day limitation under Order XXI Rule 106 CPC applies only if the execution petition was set down for hearing, and upheld the executing court's order allowing restoration beyond that period under inherent powers.
Krishna Chaudhary v. Sharad Sharma
The court held that the petitioner, as the owner, is the landlord entitled to evict the respondent tenant despite fraudulent sale documents, allowing eviction under Section 14D of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958.
Vivek Mehta v. Vijay Sah & Ors.
The High Court held that a plaint disclosing cause of action on its face cannot be rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC and remanded the matter for trial.