Delhi High Court
93,075 judgments
Shri Shiv Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging direct recruitment advertisement, holding that a candidate cannot question the selection process after participating and failing, especially when delayed in challenging prior promotion rejections.
Cachet Real Estates Private Limited and Ors. v. DLF Universal Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between multiple real estate companies and DLF Universal Ltd under sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956 after ensuring compliance with statutory requirements and land ceiling laws.
Manav Mandir Mission Trust v. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging possession and demolition of land claimed by the petitioner, holding that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act only if possession and compensation issues are adjudicated, and unauthorized possession without title is not protected.
Devender Kumar v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking directions for expeditious reference of an industrial dispute but imposed costs on the Union of India for undue delay and allowed the petitioner liberty to challenge the refusal order.
M/S INPLAN v. BANARAS MANUFACTURERS PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the defendant's belated applications to amend pleadings and file additional evidence and documents, emphasizing timely pleadings and preventing delay in a contract recovery suit.
Housing & Urban Development Corporation Limited v. Additional Commissioner of Income Tax
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal deleting the addition of 1.5% administrative expenses on residential quarters, holding that such overhead charges were applicable only to the community centre as per the meeting minutes and no income accrued on residential quarters.
Union of India v. Bal Kishan
The Delhi High Court set aside the CAT's order directing immediate regularisation of a seasonal employee, holding that regularisation must strictly follow the 1997 Scheme's conditions and procedures.
Appellant v. M/S VINOD KUMAR & SONS
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award and dismissed the appeal, affirming limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
M/S Roshan Real Estates Pvt Ltd v. Indira Gandhi National Open University
The Delhi High Court held that Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act cannot be invoked to expand arbitration claims after arbitrator appointment, directing the petitioner to seek relief under Section 23(3) before the arbitrator.
National Insurance Company v. Devender Sotre & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that absence of rash and negligent driving precludes a claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act but allows compensation under Section 163A's no-fault liability, reducing the awarded amount accordingly.
Triputi Pharma & Anr. v. Lincoln Pharmaceuticals Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction to the plaintiffs restraining defendants from using the deceptively similar trademark BODYVITAL and packaging infringing the plaintiffs' exclusive trademark BODYRICH.
Oriental Pathways (Nagpur) Pvt. Ltd. v. National Highways Authority of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award rejecting compensation claims for price escalation under the force majeure clause, holding that increased costs do not constitute force majeure unless performance becomes impossible.
Anita Devi v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the claimant failed to prove the deceased was a bonafide passenger who died due to an untoward incident on the train, thus denying compensation under the Railway Claims Tribunal Act.
Sangeeta and Anr. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the Railway Claims Tribunal's rejection of compensation, holding that the deceased was not a bona fide passenger and died due to being run over while crossing railway tracks, not from an accidental fall from a train.
Rajendra Kumar & Anr. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal seeking compensation for death by run-over, holding that such death does not qualify as an 'untoward incident' under the Railways Act, 1989, and thus no compensation is payable under the Railways Claims Tribunal Act.
Government of NCT of Delhi v. Anil Kumar and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's order directing one-time regularization of full-time temporary Group-D employees with over ten years' service, rejecting GNCTD's challenge based on recruitment rules and redundancy claims.
ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. v. GURDEV MAINI & ORS
Delhi High Court held that the multiplier for compensation in motor accident claims must be based on the deceased's age, dismissed insurer's appeal on contributory negligence and income assessment, and enhanced compensation accordingly.
NATIONAL INSRUANCE CO.LTD. v. DEEP NARAIN YADAV & ORS.
Delhi High Court dismissed insurer's appeals challenging compensation awarded to motor accident victims' dependents, upholding addition of future prospects and multiplier applied as just and reasonable.
Dinesh Prasad Sharma v. C.M.D. BSNL & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a voluntary retirement notice becomes effective by operation of law if no refusal is communicated before expiry of the notice period, entitling the employee to pension and terminal benefits from that date.
Habeeb-ur Rehman & Anr v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Ors
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 325 and 34 IPC arising from a domestic dispute between brothers on the basis of amicable settlement, emphasizing the sparing exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to preserve family harmony.