Delhi High Court

93,075 judgments

Year:

K.K. Modi Investment & Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Apollo International Inc. & Ors.

31 Oct 2014 · Jayant Nath · 2014:DHC:5648

The Delhi High Court held that defendants not party to a shareholders agreement may be bound by its non-compete clause through conduct and lifting of the corporate veil, and are necessary parties to the suit, rejecting their applications to dismiss or delete them.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant corporate veil lifting privity of contract by conduct non-compete clause Order VII Rule 11 CPC

Hitesh Sagar v. Union of India and Ors.

31 Oct 2014 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Vipin Sanghi · 2014:DHC:5643-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the termination of a temporary government employee for lack of requisite experience despite verification of certificates, holding no formal inquiry was necessary when termination is based on unsuitability.

service_law petition_dismissed Significant temporary government employee termination experience certificate verification

Delhi Development Authority v. Rajiv Gupta

31 Oct 2014 · Kailash Gambhir; Najmi Waziri · 2014:DHC:5655-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the allottee's right to allotment of an alternate flat despite delay, holding the DDA liable for deficiency in service and directing allotment with payment.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Development Authority New Pattern Registration Scheme 1979 flat allotment deficiency in service

Bachan Lal Saini v. Harbans Singh

31 Oct 2014 · Sunil Gaur · 2014:DHC:5636

The Delhi High Court held that a suit for recovery of possession filed by an owner does not abate if the property devolves upon a trust during pendency and the plaintiff remains a trustee.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant recovery of possession locus standi trust ownership abatement of suit

Neena Vohra v. Delhi Development Authority

31 Oct 2014 · Sunil Gaur · 2014:DHC:5637

The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal, holding that the appellant cannot raise the issue of misuser charges for the first time at this stage and no substantial question of law arises.

property appeal_dismissed mandatory injunction leasehold to freehold conversion misuser charges estoppel

Kartar Singh v. Pooja

31 Oct 2014 · Sunil Gaur · 2014:DHC:5638

The Delhi High Court dismissed as premature a petition challenging Family Court orders allowing a review petition involving fraud allegations, directing the Family Court to decide the matter in accordance with law.

family petition_dismissed review petition fraud allegations maintainability Family Court

Union of India v. M/S. Navayuga Engineering Co. Ltd. & Anr.

31 Oct 2014 · Jyoti Singh, J. · 2019:DHC:6492
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court held that delay beyond the 120-day period under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot be condoned, and administrative delay does not constitute sufficient cause for such condonation.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34(3) condonation of delay limitation period

SPML INFRA LIMITED v. GRAPHITE INDIA LIMITED

31 Oct 2014 · Jyoti Singh · 2020:DHC:1074

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging an arbitral award due to failure to show sufficient cause for delay beyond the strict limitation period and held that fundamental filing defects render the petition invalid to stop limitation.

civil petition_dismissed Significant condonation of delay Section 34(3) Arbitration and Conciliation Act limitation period sufficient cause

Ram Murat v. M/S. Dynatech Controls (P) Ltd.

30 Oct 2014 · Vibhu BakhrU, J · 2014:DHC:5575

The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's finding of unjustified termination of a workman and affirmed compensation awarded in lieu of reinstatement, emphasizing the employer's burden to prove voluntary resignation.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant illegal termination voluntary resignation compensation in lieu of reinstatement Labour Court award

ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. v. M/S OCEANIC SOLVENT INDUSTRIES LTD.

30 Oct 2014 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2014:DHC:5577

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner’s application for condonation of delay and restoration of an arbitration-related petition, imposing costs due to delay caused by difficulties in inspection and personal reasons.

civil appeal_allowed Significant condonation of delay application for restoration arbitration award inspection of court records

Reserve Bank of India v. B.S. Rawat

30 Oct 2014 · Suresh Kait · 2014:DHC:5591

The Delhi High Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal's reduction of dismissal to discharge for an indebted RBI employee, affirming Regulation 45's applicability but deeming dismissal harsh and disproportionate under the facts.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Regulation 45 RBI Staff Regulations employee indebtedness disciplinary action dismissal from service

Ashok v. Gagan

30 Oct 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:5582

The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of a tenant on the ground of landlord's bonafide necessity for business and office use under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958.

property appeal_dismissed bonafide necessity eviction Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e) landlord-tenant relationship

L K Kaul v. Pradeep Kumar Khanna (HUF) & Ors.

30 Oct 2014 · Kailash Gambhir; Najmi Waziri · 2014:DHC:5597-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal seeking restoration of a suit and condonation of delay, holding that mere assertion of Alzheimer's disease without adequate medical evidence does not constitute sufficient cause to excuse a 548-day delay.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant condonation of delay restoration of suit Alzheimer's disease sufficient cause

Baldev Singh Solanki v. State & Ors.

30 Oct 2014 · Pratibha Rani · 2014:DHC:5595

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the setting aside of summons to police officers, holding that non-registration of FIR does not constitute offences under Sections 120-B or 442 IPC and proper remedy lies under Cr.P.C. provisions, not criminal prosecution without evidence.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant non-registration of FIR summoning of accused Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. Section 120-B IPC

Sh. Sewa Ram & Ors. v. Sh. Ashraf & Ors.

30 Oct 2014 · Jayant Nath · 2014:DHC:5600

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by applying the correct multiplier based on the deceased's age, considering future prospects, and rejecting the set-off of insurance proceeds.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 compensation loss of dependency multiplier

Jitender Kumar @ Jai v. State of Delhi

30 Oct 2014 · Pratibha Rani · 2014:DHC:5594

The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellants of gang rape charges due to insufficient evidence but convicted them for lesser offences of kidnapping and outraging modesty under Sections 366 and 354 IPC, applying Section 222 CrPC to convict for a lesser offence not originally charged.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant gang rape Section 376 IPC Section 366 IPC Section 354 IPC

Ritu Gupta & Anr v. Usha Dhand & Ors

30 Oct 2014 · G. S. Sistani · 2014:DHC:5596

The Delhi High Court held that civil courts have jurisdiction to try suits alleging fraud in sale deeds despite SARFAESI proceedings, and confirmed interim relief maintaining status quo pending trial.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant SARFAESI Act Section 34 SARFAESI civil court jurisdiction fraudulent sale deed

Haryana Petrochemicals Ltd. v. Indian Petrochemicals Ltd.

30 Oct 2014 · Indermeet Kaur · 2014:DHC:5580

The Delhi High Court upheld convictions under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, validating company authorization, legal notice service, and compensation awarded beyond fine under CrPC revisional powers.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Dishonour of cheque Authorization to file complaint Legal notice service

Gakko Bunka Education Society v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation and Anr.

30 Oct 2014 · Manmohan · 2014:DHC:5581

Delhi High Court held that an educational society with income tax exemption under Section 12A is entitled to exemption from additional FAR charges under DDA Notification 2012 and directed refund of charges paid under protest.

administrative petition_allowed Significant additional FAR charges DDA Notification 17th July 2012 income tax exemption Section 12A Income Tax Act

Director of Income Tax (E) v. Indo French Centre

30 Oct 2014 · Sanjiv Khanna; V. Kameswar Rao · 2014:DHC:5593-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the exemption of interest income earned by the Indo French Centre on foreign deposits under a special CBDT order, rejecting Revenue's claim of taxability under Sections 11 and 13 of the Income Tax Act.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act 1961 Section 11 exemption Section 13(1)(d) Section 164(2)