Delhi High Court
93,075 judgments
Vinod v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal upholding the dismissal of a Railway Protection Force employee after a fair departmental enquiry and rejected claims of procedural irregularity and limitation.
Surender Singh & Ors. v. Delhi Transport Corporation
The Delhi High Court held that administrative actions by DTC must comply with natural justice and service rules, setting aside arbitrary orders and directing reconsideration.
Surender Singh & Ors. v. Delhi Transport Corporation
This judgment addresses multiple writ petitions involving employment disputes between Delhi Transport Corporation and its employees, decided by the Delhi High Court in 2014.
Surender Singh & Ors. v. Delhi Transport Corporation
The Delhi High Court emphasized judicial restraint in service matters involving the Delhi Transport Corporation, affirming writ jurisdiction under Article 226 only where fundamental rights are violated or no alternative remedy exists.
Surender Singh & Ors. v. Delhi Transport Corporation
The Delhi High Court clarified the scope of writ jurisdiction in employment disputes involving the Delhi Transport Corporation, emphasizing judicial review for illegality and fundamental rights violations while encouraging exhaustion of alternative remedies.
Delhi Transport Corporation v. Sh. Sanjay Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that repeated medical examinations by independent boards confirming colour blindness justify dismissal of drivers, and a tribunal cannot direct further tests absent illegality or mala fides.
Kutub Singh and Ors. v. Delhi Jal Board and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that holding a post on current duty charge does not confer regular promotion or seniority, and dismissed the petitioners' claim to be regular Assistant Engineers against non-existent reserved vacancies, upholding reservation principles and preventing excess representation.
Sh. Narendra and Ors. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that the petitioners, as later recruits, are entitled to parity in pay scale and designation with earlier Vaccinators under binding Industrial Tribunal awards, striking down arbitrary bifurcation by MCD.
Lachhman @ Raju & Anr v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellants in a dowry death case, holding that the prosecution failed to prove cruelty and dowry demand beyond reasonable doubt and that the presumption under Section 113B Evidence Act is rebuttable on preponderance of probabilities.
Diamond Footstep Pvt Ltd & Anr. v. Unknown
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between three companies under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, dispensing with meetings based on unanimous and majority consents.
Rudolf Exim Private Ltd v. CLC Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed the application under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, dispensing with meetings of shareholders and creditors for a Scheme of Amalgamation based on their written consents.
Jagbir Singh v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging land acquisition proceedings as withdrawn, noting the issue of lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act was pending before a larger bench and granted liberty to file an appropriate petition.
CREST EDUCATION (P) LTD v. CAREER LAUNCHER (I) LTD
The Delhi High Court condoned a 66-day delay in re-filing a Section 34 petition challenging an arbitral award, emphasizing practical flexibility in procedural timelines and curability of defects, while imposing costs for delayed court fee payment.
Sh. Randhir Jain v. Sh. Neeraj Parekh & Anr.
The High Court dismissed a petition under Article 227 challenging a routine procedural order granting further time to file replies, emphasizing that such extraordinary jurisdiction should not be exercised routinely.
Mr. Rakesh Nanda v. Ms. Renu Gupta
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition under Article 227 challenging the order directing the petitioner to file a written statement in an eviction proceeding, holding that the petitioner had been supplied with the best legible copies of documents and that extraordinary jurisdiction should not be used to delay the case.
Rabibul v. State
The Delhi High Court reduced the appellant’s conviction from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304-II IPC, holding that the fatal injury occurred during a sudden quarrel without intent to cause death.
Riyaz Khan v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Riyaz Khan for murder, attempted murder, and robbery based on credible eyewitness identification, recovery of weapon, and corroborative evidence despite non-recovery of stolen property.
G S Dhodi v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective revision of damage charges for unauthorized occupation of government accommodation is impermissible and such charges can only be applied prospectively.
M/S VITA INDUSTRIES v. THE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner’s claim for possession of a larger industrial plot due to delay and laches, directing possession of the downsized plot instead.
Reckitt Benckiser (India) Ltd & Anr. v. Dabur India Ltd.
The Delhi High Court refused interim injunction in a trademark and copyright infringement suit, holding that the defendant's advertisement and fireman device were not deceptively similar to the plaintiffs' registered mark and that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case of passing off or infringement.