Delhi High Court

93,075 judgments

Year:

d82f5ab95f182597610b1009075515fd828e5a515a5652be19fac0742f549480

13 Jan 2015 · Tibht BakhrU · 2015:DHC:11815

The Delhi High Court directed the NDMC to operationalize the Town Vending Committee to adjudicate street vendors' grievances under the Street Vendors Act, 2014, and restrained eviction until due process is followed.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Street Vendors Act 2014 Section 3(3) Town Vending Committee injunction

EDU SMART SERVICES PVT LTD & ANR v. SAI GURUKUL SCHOOL

13 Jan 2015 · S. MURALIDHAR · 2015:DHC:11690

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition and directed the parties to seek interim relief before the appointed arbitrator under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil petition_dismissed Arbitration Arbitrator appointment Interim relief Section 17 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

PLUS CORPORATE VENTURES PVT LTD v. RELIGARE FINVEST LTD & ANR

13 Jan 2015 · S. Muralidhar · 2015:DHC:11689

The Delhi High Court held that interim orders under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act continue during arbitration and disposed of the petitions while allowing parties to rely on pleadings before the arbitral tribunal.

civil petition_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 9 interim relief Section 11 arbitral tribunal appointment Section 17 modification of interim orders

Deepanjana v. Yudhvir Singh Gariya

13 Jan 2015 · Kailash Gambhir; L.S. Mehta · 2015:DHC:11650-DB

The High Court held that executing courts must direct payment of all maintenance arrears accrued till disposal of execution petitions, not just those due at filing, and remanded the matter for appropriate directions.

family appeal_allowed Significant maintenance order execution petition arrears of maintenance Family Courts Act, 1984

G L Sharma v. Shobha Saxena

13 Jan 2015 · Sunita Gupta · 2015:DHC:10751

The Delhi High Court set aside the trial court's acquittal and convicted the accused under Section 138 NI Act, holding that the presumption under Section 139 was not rebutted and legal notice was duly served.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 139 NI Act presumption Cheque dishonour Legal notice service

Jojo Mathew v. State

13 Jan 2015 · S.P. Garg · 2015:DHC:10584

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a cheating case subject to furnishing bond, surety, cooperation with investigation, and payment of Rs. 2 lakhs to the complainant.

criminal appeal_allowed anticipatory bail Section 419 IPC Section 420 IPC cheating

Aman Kumar Harjai v. State & Anr.

13 Jan 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:10590

The High Court held that inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. should not be exercised to quash a complaint before framing notice under Section 251 Cr.P.C., directing the petitioner to raise objections before the trial court.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 251 Cr.P.C. Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of complaint

Krishan Kumar v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)

13 Jan 2015 · Vipin Sanghi · 2015:DHC:10554

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners named in an FIR without specific roles, emphasizing their cooperation with the investigation and directing release on bail upon arrest.

criminal appeal_allowed anticipatory bail Section 438 Cr.P.C. investigation FIR

Rajesh Jain v. CBI

13 Jan 2015 · Vipin Sanghi · 2015:DHC:10553

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to accused directors in a large-scale bank fraud case, emphasizing parity with other accused and the absence of necessity for custodial interrogation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail Section 438 CrPC bank fraud CBI investigation

L & T Finance Limited v. OM Constructions & Anr.

13 Jan 2015 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2015:DHC:342

The Delhi High Court appointed a Receiver under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to repossess hypothecated construction equipment due to loan default, granting interim relief pending arbitration.

civil petition_allowed Significant Section 9 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 loan-cum-hypothecation agreement repossession Receiver appointment

L & T Finance Limited v. Shree Bricks Udyog and Anr.

13 Jan 2015 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2015:DHC:345

The Delhi High Court appointed a receiver under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to repossess hypothecated construction equipment due to loan default pending arbitration.

civil petition_allowed Section 9 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 interim relief receiver appointment hypothecation agreement

L & T Finance Limited v. Ober Construction Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.

13 Jan 2015 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2015:DHC:344

The Delhi High Court appointed a Receiver to repossess hypothecated construction equipment due to loan default, granting interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act pending arbitration.

civil petition_allowed Section 9 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 loan-cum-hypothecation agreement repossession Receiver appointment

Geeta & Ors. v. Dinesh Chander & Ors.

13 Jan 2015 · G. P. Mittal · 2015:DHC:346

The Delhi High Court enhanced motor accident compensation by considering the deceased's actual income with future prospects and held the insurer liable despite vehicle overloading, clarifying principles on income tax deduction and dependency.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident compensation loss of dependency income tax returns future prospects

Anil Kumar Jain & Ors v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr

13 Jan 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:307

The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR against petitioners based on a settlement with the minor victim, emphasizing the welfare of the child and directing custodial and financial arrangements accordingly.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR settlement agreement Section 370 IPC Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act

Anil Kumar v. The State & Anr

13 Jan 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:308

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 363 IPC based on amicable settlement and voluntary marriage of a minor close to majority, emphasizing prevention of abuse of process of law.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 363 IPC amicable settlement minor consent

Sanjeev Kumar Budhiraja & Ors. v. State & Ors.

13 Jan 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:306

The Delhi High Court quashed two cross FIRs arising from a misunderstanding between parties on the basis of an amicable settlement, emphasizing the court's power to end criminal proceedings to secure justice and prevent abuse of process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR amicable settlement cross FIRs abuse of process of law

Sanjeev Kumar Budhiraja & Ors. v. State & Ors.

13 Jan 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:305

The Delhi High Court quashed two cross FIRs arising from a settled dispute, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process and contrary to justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR amicable settlement cross FIRs abuse of process

Manjeet @ American v. State of NCT of Delhi

13 Jan 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:304

Bail was denied to the petitioner involved in a double murder conspiracy and possession of an unauthorized firearm due to the gravity of offences and active participation, distinguishing his case from co-accused granted bail.

criminal appeal_dismissed bail Section 439 CrPC murder criminal conspiracy

Mohd. Abrar v. Prem Chand @ Prem Singh

13 Jan 2015 · V.K. Shali · 2015:DHC:303

The Delhi High Court held that an eviction suit by one legal heir without joining others is maintainable and dismissed the appellant's second appeal for lack of substantial question of law.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant eviction suit legal heirs Family General Power of Attorney tenancy termination

CIT v. Funnay Time Finvest Ltd

13 Jan 2015 · S. Ravindra Bhat; R.K. Gauba · 2015:DHC:302

The Delhi High Court upheld the deletion of unexplained share capital addition under Section 68, emphasizing the Assessing Officer's duty to independently verify evidence beyond uncorroborated statements.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 68 Income Tax unexplained share capital onus of proof reassessment under Section 148