Full Text
Translation output
X
I
$-55, 56 & 62 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 536/2015 & CM 903/2015
SHRl SHYAM INDUSTRIAL TRAINING INSTITUTE Petitioner
I
$-55, 56 & 62 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 536/2015 & CM 903/2015
SHRl SHYAM INDUSTRIAL TRAINING INSTITUTE Petitioner
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondents
W.P.(C) 537/2015 CM 914/2015
MANGAL SINGH INDUSTRIAL TRAINING INSTITUTE Petitioner
MANGAL SINGH INDUSTRIAL TRAINING INSTITUTE Petitioner
VERSUS
W.P.(C) 561/2015 & CM 947/2015
VIBGYOR INDUSTRIAL TRAINING CENTRE Petitioner
VIBGYOR INDUSTRIAL TRAINING CENTRE Petitioner
VERSUS
Pr: Mr Venkita Subramaniam T.R., Mr Rajiv Singh and Mr Raliat Bansal, Advocates.
Mr Rajesh Gogna, CGSC and Ms Noor Anand, Advocate for RL
Mr Rajesh Gogna, CGSC and Ms Noor Anand, Advocate for RL
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAIOIRU
19.01.2015
19.01.2015
CM 904/2015 in W.P.(C) 536/2015
CM 915/2015 in W.P.(C) 537/2015
CM 948/2015 in W.P.fC) 561/2015
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
The application is disposed of.
2015:DHC:11505 2^
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
The application is disposed of.
2015:DHC:11505 2^
W.P.(Q 536/2015, W.P.(Q 537/2015 and W.P.rC) 561/2015
Issue notice. Learned counsel for respondent Nos. 1 & 2 accepts notice.
The petitioners are institutions imparting vocational training in the
State of Uttar Pradesh. A notification dated 01.10.2013 was issued by
Vyavsayik Pariksha Parishad, Aliganj, Luclcnow, U.P. (Respondent No.4), which required the Institutes to update the names of its students on the web portal. It is alleged that although the petitioners attempted to do so but as the web portal was not functioning properly, the names of its students could not be uploaded in time. It is further contended that on this basis the students of petitioners are not being permitted to sit in their vocational Board
Examination, which are scheduled to commence on 21.01.2015. The petitioners had approached the Allahabad High Court by way of a writ petition (Writ - C No. 33221 of 2014), which was disposed of by a direction to respondent No.4 to consider the representation of the petitioners and pass an order with utmost expedition. The petitioners had also approached respondent No.2 with a representation to conduct an inquiry and consider the case of its students. Respondent No.2 had directed respondent Nos. 3 and 4 to conduct an inquiry and send a report in view of the representation made by the petitioners. The learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 states that the reports with respect to certain selective institutions were received but a report in respect of the petitioners has not been received as yet, despite several reminders being sent to respondent Nos. 3 & 4.
Learned counsel for the parties state that the students may be permitted to appear in the examination with a condition that they shall not claim any equities and their results would be subject to the enquiry that may be conducted by the respondent Nos. 3 & 4.
Since it is stated that the inquiry report of respondent Nos. 3 & 4 is awaited, I deem it appropriate that the petitioners' students be permitted to appear in the vocational board examinations. However, it is directed that no equityshall be created in favour of the students and a copy of this order shall be communicated by the petitioners to all the students who are to take the ensuing examination. It is further directed that the results of the students shall be subject to the inquiry conducted by respondent Nos. 3 & 4.
The writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid direction.
Dasti under the signature of Court Master.
VIBHU BAiaiRU, J JANUARY 19, 2015 pkv
Issue notice. Learned counsel for respondent Nos. 1 & 2 accepts notice.
The petitioners are institutions imparting vocational training in the
State of Uttar Pradesh. A notification dated 01.10.2013 was issued by
Vyavsayik Pariksha Parishad, Aliganj, Luclcnow, U.P. (Respondent No.4), which required the Institutes to update the names of its students on the web portal. It is alleged that although the petitioners attempted to do so but as the web portal was not functioning properly, the names of its students could not be uploaded in time. It is further contended that on this basis the students of petitioners are not being permitted to sit in their vocational Board
Examination, which are scheduled to commence on 21.01.2015. The petitioners had approached the Allahabad High Court by way of a writ petition (Writ - C No. 33221 of 2014), which was disposed of by a direction to respondent No.4 to consider the representation of the petitioners and pass an order with utmost expedition. The petitioners had also approached respondent No.2 with a representation to conduct an inquiry and consider the case of its students. Respondent No.2 had directed respondent Nos. 3 and 4 to conduct an inquiry and send a report in view of the representation made by the petitioners. The learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 states that the reports with respect to certain selective institutions were received but a report in respect of the petitioners has not been received as yet, despite several reminders being sent to respondent Nos. 3 & 4.
Learned counsel for the parties state that the students may be permitted to appear in the examination with a condition that they shall not claim any equities and their results would be subject to the enquiry that may be conducted by the respondent Nos. 3 & 4.
Since it is stated that the inquiry report of respondent Nos. 3 & 4 is awaited, I deem it appropriate that the petitioners' students be permitted to appear in the vocational board examinations. However, it is directed that no equityshall be created in favour of the students and a copy of this order shall be communicated by the petitioners to all the students who are to take the ensuing examination. It is further directed that the results of the students shall be subject to the inquiry conducted by respondent Nos. 3 & 4.
The writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid direction.
Dasti under the signature of Court Master.
VIBHU BAiaiRU, J JANUARY 19, 2015 pkv
JUDGMENT