Delhi High Court
93,563 judgments
Alkem Laboratories Ltd v. Sanjay Bhatia & Ors
The Delhi High Court permitted the plaintiff to withdraw the suit with liberty to file a fresh suit due to the need for extensive amendments in the plaint.
Rakesh Kumar Jain v. M/S Stalward Properteis Pvt Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a civil suit by consent following a comprehensive settlement between the parties, with each party bearing its own costs.
State of NCT of Delhi v. Sanjay @ Sonu
The High Court dismissed the leave to appeal against the acquittal in a murder case, holding that the trial court's judgment was a plausible view and no substantial reason existed to interfere.
M/S D.C.M. SHRI RAM CONSOLIDATE LTD v. B.K. GUPTA
The Delhi High Court set aside the Labour Court's award declaring an Assistant Weaving Master a workman, holding that his supervisory role and wage level excluded him from the definition of workman under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act.
Om Prakash & Anr. v. State
The Delhi High Court affirmed convictions under Sections 148 and 308 read with 149 IPC but modified sentences to probation due to settlement and mitigating factors.
Gyan Parkash & Ors. v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the framing of charges under Sections 498A, 304B, 406, and 34 IPC in a dowry death case, holding that at the charge framing stage, the court must accept prosecution material as true and that 'soon before' in Section 304B IPC is a relative term.
Rama Goel v. Moti Gupta
The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff's amendment application post commencement of trial to include subsequent events and additional reliefs, emphasizing liberal amendment principles to decide the real controversy.
Atul Agarwal v. M/S Ascent Infracon Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court granted an ex parte decree in a summary suit for recovery of a loan amount and interest where the defendant failed to appear despite substituted service.
M/S S & S TECHNOCRAFT (P) LTD v. RATHI STEEL LIMITED
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against refusal of leave to defend a suit for steel supply payment, holding that delayed and vague pleas of defective goods and forged documents were sham and the suit was within limitation.
Vijay Prakash Vijay; Raghubir Singh Saini; Surinder Kumar v. Prof Tarun Kumar Dass
The Delhi High Court directed the University of Delhi to deposit awarded gratuity amounts with interest pending appeal, ensuring compliance with the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.
Surinder Mohan Talwar & Ors v. Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Co. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging an arbitral award due to an unconvincing explanation for a 980-day delay in filing, refusing to condone the delay.
Supreme Court in Maharashtra Ekta Hawkers Union and v. Anr., 2013(11) SCALE 329
The Delhi High Court held that disputes regarding street vendors' rights under the Street Vendors Act, 2014 must be decided by the Town Vending Committee, directing NDMC to make the Committee functional and permitting petitioners to file representations before it.
Smt. Vesuta & Ors. v. Rajendersesfgh & Ors.
Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by applying a higher multiplier and increasing non-pecuniary damages under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
M/S A.P. PROCESSORS v. M/S DIAMOND EXPORT & OTHERS
The Delhi High Court recorded a voluntary settlement reached through court annexed mediation, disposed of the suit and counter claim, and granted refund of 50% court fees under Section 16-A of the Court Fees Act, 1870.
Man Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation remains unpaid for over five years, regardless of possession claims.
Dharmendra Prasad Singh & Ors. v. The Chairman, State Bank of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the State Bank of India cannot regularize contractual employees contrary to the binding Supreme Court precedent in Secretary, State of Karnataka v. Umadevi & Ors., and dismissed the petition seeking such regularization.
CHOICE HOTELS INTERNATIONAL INC v. M SANJAY KUMAR AND ANR
The Delhi High Court held that the plaintiff's well-known trademark 'Comfort Inn' was infringed by the defendants' use of 'Raj Comfort Inn' for hotel services, granting interim injunction and affirming protection for trans-border reputation under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
Tulip Engineering Pvt. Ltd. v. Income Tax Officer
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of reassessment proceedings and additions under Section 68 despite absence of notice under Section 143(2), relying on Section 292BB and tangible material from investigation reports.
Commissioner of Income Tax-XIV v. Vivek Aggarwal
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Commissioner of Income Tax's appeals, upholding the ITAT's decision to set aside unjustified income additions against the taxpayer.
Commissioner of Income Tax-XIV v. Vivek Aggarwal
The Delhi High Court heard multiple Income Tax Appeals involving the Commissioner of Income Tax and Vivek Aggarwal, referencing a related decision dated 09.02.2015.