Delhi High Court

93,563 judgments

Year:

Commissioner of Income Tax-XIV v. Vivek Aggarwal

09 Feb 2015 · S. Ravindra Bhat; R.K. Gauba · 2015:DHC:1294-DB

The Delhi High Court heard multiple Income Tax Appeals involving the Commissioner of Income Tax and Vivek Aggarwal, referencing a related decision dated 09.02.2015.

tax other Income Tax Appeal Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi High Court ITA No. 67-69/2014

Commissioner of Income Tax-XIV v. Vivek Aggarwal

09 Feb 2015 · S. Ravindra Bhat; R.K. Gauba · 2015:DHC:1295-DB

The Delhi High Court heard consolidated Income Tax Appeals filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax against orders favoring Vivek Aggarwal on 9th February 2015.

tax other Income Tax Appeal Commissioner of Income Tax Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Delhi High Court

Commissioner of Income Tax-XIV v. Vivek Aggarwal

09 Feb 2015 · S. Ravindra Bhat; R.K. Gauba · 2015:DHC:1296-DB

The Delhi High Court heard multiple Income Tax Appeals filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax against Vivek Aggarwal, relating to tax assessment disputes.

tax other Income Tax Appeals Commissioner of Income Tax Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Delhi High Court

Commissioner of Income Tax-XIV v. Vivek Aggarwal

09 Feb 2015 · S. Ravindra Bhat; R.K. Gauba · 2015:DHC:1297-DB

This judgment concerns multiple Income Tax Appeals before the Delhi High Court decided on 9th February 2015, referencing a related appeal for detailed reasoning.

tax other Income Tax Appeal Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi High Court Tax Assessment

Hill Country Properties Limited v. Union of India

09 Feb 2015 · Deepa Sharma · 2015:DHC:1303

The Delhi High Court restrained coercive recovery proceedings against the petitioner pending hearing of a statutory appeal that could not be heard due to the non-appointment of the Appellate Tribunal's Presiding Officer under the Employees' Provident Fund Act.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Section 7(I) appeal Appellate Tribunal Presiding Officer vacancy

D.T.C. v. Prem Singh

09 Feb 2015 · Deepa Sharma · 2015:DHC:1305

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a departmental enquiry and termination of a driver for rash and negligent driving causing death, applying the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur and distinguishing the standard of proof from criminal proceedings.

labor appeal_allowed Significant domestic enquiry standard of proof res ipsa loquitur departmental misconduct

Kohlapur Zilhashetkariinkari Soot Girni Ltd. v. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner

09 Feb 2015 · Deepa Sharma · 2015:DHC:1304

The Delhi High Court restrained the respondent from initiating coercive recovery measures pending the hearing of the petitioner’s statutory appeal under the Employee’s Provident Fund Act due to the non-appointment of the Appellate Tribunal’s Presiding Officer.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Employee’s Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Section 7A Section 7B Section 7(I)

Santosh Kumar v. The State of Delhi

09 Feb 2015 · S.P. Garg · 2015:DHC:1243

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's criminal appeal as infructuous since he had already served the sentence and paid the fine, without deciding the merits.

criminal appeal_dismissed abduction rape minor Section 363 IPC

Dr. Ms Jyotsna Sharma v. University of Delhi

09 Feb 2015 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2015:DHC:1247

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging acceptance of resignation after an eight-year delay due to insufficient medical evidence of continuous mental incapacity to justify condonation of delay.

constitutional petition_dismissed writ petition resignation acceptance mental incapacity condonation of delay

A Kumar Sharma v. CBI

09 Feb 2015 · Ved Prakash Vaish · 2015:DHC:1244

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings against a panel advocate for alleged bank fraud, holding that mere negligence without evidence of conspiracy does not attract criminal liability.

criminal petition_allowed Significant advocate liability criminal conspiracy negligence legal opinion

HDFC Bank Ltd. v. Sudesh Kumar

09 Feb 2015 · Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:1287

The High Court upheld the validity of the sale of a vehicle pursuant to an unchallenged arbitral award and set aside the trial court's order invalidating the sale and imposing costs.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitral award Section 9 Arbitration Act Interim order Order 40 Rule 3 CPC

Commissioner of Income Tax-XIV v. Vivek Aggarwal

09 Feb 2015 · S. Ravindra Bhat; R.K. Gauba · 2015:DHC:1288-DB
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's order rejecting income additions based on uncorroborated, undated, unsigned documents seized during search, emphasizing the need for credible evidence and limiting block assessment additions to the relevant period.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant block assessment undisclosed income search and seizure Section 132(4A)

Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Sangeeta and Ors.

09 Feb 2015 · G. P. Mittal · 2015:DHC:1298

The Delhi High Court upheld the Claims Tribunal's finding of negligence against the driver of a bus and dismissed the insurance company's appeal, affirming insurer's liability under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act.

motor_accident_claims appeal_dismissed Significant negligence rash driving motor accident claim insurance liability

Rajni Jain & Anr v. Parag Jain

09 Feb 2015 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2015:DHC:1237-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's refusal to reject a plaint for specific performance despite the owner's signature absence on the Agreement to Sell, holding that the plaint disclosed a cause of action and such issues are triable.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC specific performance cause of action Agreement to Sell

Santosh Kumar Singh & Anr v. Union of India; Raja Bai & Anr v. Union of India

09 Feb 2015 · The Chief Justice; Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2015:DHC:1233-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed appeals challenging Union of India guidelines on new petrol outlets, holding the court lacked territorial jurisdiction and that commercial policy decisions of Oil Marketing Companies are not judicially reviewable absent mala fide or arbitrariness.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Article 226 writ petition territorial jurisdiction Oil Marketing Companies

Sona Babbar v. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi

09 Feb 2015 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2015:DHC:1286
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a charge-sheet issued under proper authorization and appointment of an enquiry officer after considering replies cannot be challenged at the initial stage of disciplinary proceedings absent jurisdictional defects or proven bias.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant charge-sheet disciplinary proceedings jurisdiction writ petition

Hoshiyar Singh v. State

09 Feb 2015 · S. P. Garg · 2015:DHC:1262

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of a father for repeatedly raping his minor daughter, relying on credible victim testimony corroborated by medical and forensic evidence, and dismissed the appellant's defence of false implication and alibi.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rape sexual assault Section 376 IPC Section 506 IPC

Santosh Kumar Singh & Anr v. Union of India; Raja Bai & Anr v. Union of India

09 Feb 2015 · The Chief Justice; Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J. · 2015:DHC:1234-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed appeals challenging Union of India's guidelines on new petrol outlets, holding it lacked jurisdiction and that policy decisions of Oil Marketing Companies are not ordinarily subject to judicial review.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Article 226 Constitution of India Oil Marketing Companies retail petrol outlets jurisdiction

Suresh Chand Jain v. Rajesh Jain

09 Feb 2015 · Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:1242

The Delhi High Court allowed the landlord’s eviction petition under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding that the landlord’s bona fide residential requirement must be respected and that availability of alternate accommodation negates eviction only if it is reasonably suitable.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e) bona fide requirement landlord-tenant dispute

Naresh Gautam v. State

09 Feb 2015 · Vipin Sanghi · 2015:DHC:1238

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Sections 307/34 IPC, ruling that minor contradictions in prosecution evidence do not vitiate a case proved beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed attempt to murder Section 307 IPC Section 34 IPC common intention