Delhi High Court
93,877 judgments
Commissioner of Police and Ors. v. Constable (Mounted) Laxmi Narayan
The Delhi High Court set aside the CAT order directing out of turn promotion under a superseded Standing Order, holding that claims must be considered under the applicable Standing Order and that illegal benefits granted to others cannot be claimed under Article 14.
CIT v. Indian Farmer Fertilizer Co-Operative
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 244A of the Income Tax Act, an assessee is entitled only to interest on the refund amount and not to interest on delayed payment of such interest, overruling the ITAT's contrary order.
M.R. Bhangalya v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging pension deduction during re-employment, holding that relevant Office Memoranda must be read together to justify such deductions.
HDFC ERGO GEN. INSURANCE CO. LTD. v. BABLU SAHANI
Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for a deceased homemaker in a motor accident, ruling no deduction for personal expenses and clarifying counsel fee awards under Motor Vehicles Act and High Court Rules.
TATA SONS LTD v. NEIL SOMBUNTHAM & ANR
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction to Tata Sons Ltd restraining defendants from using the 'TATA' trademark in the domain name www.tatamassage.com and ordered transfer of the domain name, holding it to be trademark infringement.
Manish Kumar v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a genuine amicable settlement and mutual divorce, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Sunil Rakheja & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC based on an amicable settlement, reaffirming the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to end futile criminal proceedings in such cases.
Poonam H. Shokeen v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The High Court held that the Revisional Court must hear the proposed accused before dismissing a revision petition challenging dismissal of complaint under Section 203 Cr.P.C., and quashed the impugned order for non-compliance.
Dinesh Sharma v. State (Delhi Admn)
The High Court held that a Metropolitan Magistrate has jurisdiction to take cognizance in absence of a Municipal Magistrate and that limitation issues must be decided by the trial court, dismissing the petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Arvind Madhok v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 420, 468, and 471 IPC based on an amicable settlement between employer and employee, emphasizing the cautious exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Sunil Kumar @ Google v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 308 and 341 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between neighbors, applying the principles governing quashing under Section 482 CrPC.
Deepak Kumar & Ors. v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 406/34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act based on an amicable settlement, applying the principles governing quashing under Section 482 CrPC in matrimonial disputes.
Sunil Kumar v. State (Govt. of NCT) of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the convictions of two accused for dacoity and criminal conspiracy based on credible witness testimony and circumstantial evidence, while reducing their sentences from 10 to 7 years.
Manoj Kumar v. Director of Revenue Intelligence
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner involved in pseudoephedrine trafficking, emphasizing his subordinate role, prolonged custody, and inapplicability of Section 37 NDPS Act to controlled substances.
M/S PRESIDENCY KID LEATHER PVT. LTD. v. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER-II
The Delhi High Court restrained coercive recovery measures against the petitioner until the statutory appeal under the Employee’s Provident Fund Act is heard, due to the non-appointment of the Appellate Tribunal’s Presiding Officer.
Badarpur Thermal Power Station v. Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal Cum Labour Court & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that departmental inquiry can proceed despite pending criminal trial, acquittal on benefit of doubt does not mandate reinstatement, and set aside the Labour Court's award reinstating a daily wage employee dismissed for misconduct.
M/S GRASSMORE TEA ESTATE v. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER-II
The Delhi High Court restrained coercive recovery under the EPF Act pending hearing of a statutory appeal that could not be heard due to the non-appointment of the Appellate Tribunal’s Presiding Officer.
M/S HOTEL RANI CASTLE v. E.P.F. APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AND ANR.
The Delhi High Court restrained coercive recovery measures against the petitioner pending hearing of a statutory appeal that could not be heard due to the non-appointment of the Appellate Tribunal's Presiding Officer.
BSNL v. The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner Bareilly
The Delhi High Court restrained coercive recovery under the EPF Act pending hearing of a statutory appeal that could not be heard due to the non-appointment of the Appellate Tribunal's Presiding Officer.
M/S TUBE EXPANSION EQUIPMENT PVT. LTD. v. ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER-II
The Delhi High Court restrained coercive recovery under EPF Act pending hearing of statutory appeal which was delayed due to non-appointment of the Appellate Tribunal’s Presiding Officer.