Delhi High Court
93,877 judgments
Maneesh Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court restrained recovery proceedings under the EPF Act pending hearing of a statutory appeal, due to the non-appointment of the Appellate Tribunal’s Presiding Officer, protecting the petitioner’s statutory right of appeal.
M/S KUNDAN & SONS v. ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER-II
The Delhi High Court restrained coercive recovery under EPF Act pending hearing of statutory appeal due to non-appointment of the Appellate Tribunal’s Presiding Officer, protecting the petitioner’s statutory right of appeal.
Ajay Kumar Bhardwaj v. DTC
The Delhi High Court held that dismissal of a government servant convicted of criminal offences unrelated to official duty is valid despite pending appeal and interim bail, as departmental protection applies only to acts committed while on duty.
Mohinder Pal Singh v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
The High Court dismissed the petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. holding that inherent powers cannot override statutory bars on revision and that police investigation under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. is warranted only when police assistance is necessary.
Sushil Kumar Kasana v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition under the 1894 Act lapses under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is unpaid for five years, granting subsequent purchasers the right to claim lapse of acquisition.
Sushila @ Babli v. Rambir Singh
The court allowed the decree holders to withdraw their execution petition with leave, reserving the right to file a fresh petition within the limitation period.
Vsaar Fashions Pvt Ltd v. Isha Natural Beauty Products & Wellness Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court allowed impleadment of a co-defendant and disposed of the suit on the basis of a voluntary out of court settlement, granting refund of 50% court fees under Section 16A of the Court Fees Act.
Balli v. Kallo Devi & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the civil suit for non-prosecution due to the plaintiff's repeated absence from hearings.
Basti Ram v. Delhi Development Authority
Acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation remains unpaid for over five years, regardless of possession claims.
M/S RUNWELL (INDIA) PVT. LIMITED v. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation remains unpaid for over five years, regardless of physical possession.
Hans Kumar Jain v. Renu Gandotra @ Poonam
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging acquittal under Section 138 NI Act, holding that the complainant failed to prove delivery of goods and that a security cheque dishonour does not attract criminal liability.
Deputy General Manager Telecom Project, BSNL, Jalandhar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court restrained coercive recovery under EPF Act where the statutory appeal could not be heard due to non-appointment of the Appellate Tribunal's Presiding Officer, protecting the petitioner's statutory right of appeal.
Shiv Raj Singh v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the compulsory retirement penalty imposed on an RPF constable found intoxicated on duty, holding that credible evidence sufficed despite absence of blood test.
Mobinteco Limited v. Hike Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Amalgamation between two transferor companies and a transferee company, dispensing with the requirement of convening meetings of shareholders and creditors as all had given written consent.
Meena Sharma v. Rajiv Kumar & Anr.
The Court held that a tenant must comply with orders under Section 15(1) and statutory obligations under Section 26 of the Delhi Rent Control Act to claim protection under Section 14(2), and remanded the matter for fresh consideration of subsequent rent defaults.
Ministry of Road Transport and Highways Government of India v. DSC Ventures Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that an Arbitral Tribunal cannot grant interim relief extending a concession agreement determinable by efflux of time, and such contracts can only be compensated by damages, not specific performance.
Jagdish Prasad v. State
The Delhi High Court held that when both attesting witnesses to a Will are dead, the Will's execution can be proved under Section 69 of the Indian Evidence Act, allowing a fresh trial to consider such evidence.
The Timberland Company v. House of Fashion & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to Timberland Company against defendants selling counterfeit goods infringing its registered trademarks.
HDFC ERGO GEN. INSURANCE CO. LTD. v. BABLU SAHNI
The Delhi High Court reduced the compensation awarded in a motor accident claim and clarified that counsel’s fees are payable under Delhi High Court Rules, with Claims Tribunals empowered to award costs like a Civil Court.
HDFC ERGO GEN. INSURANCE CO. LTD. v. BABY KHUSHBU
The Delhi High Court reduced the compensation awarded in a motor accident claim and clarified that Claims Tribunals have the power to award counsel’s fees and costs under the Delhi High Court Rules and Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Rules.