Delhi High Court
36,666 judgments
M/S JAY COLOUR COMPANY v. M/S SURENDER KUMAR JAIN
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to summon a GST Department official as a witness despite delay, since the respondent had no objection, emphasizing one effective opportunity to avoid trial delay.
Railtel Corporation of India Limited v. Primatel Fibcom Limited
The Delhi High Court held that where arbitral proceedings have commenced and disputes are known, a separate Section 21 notice is not mandatory for counter claims, allowing appointment of an independent arbitrator to adjudicate the Petitioner’s claims.
Mr. Ashwani Sharma v. Lalit Mohan & Ors
The Delhi High Court held that prior sanction under Section 197 Cr.P.C. is mandatory for prosecuting public servants acting within or in reasonable nexus to their official duties, and non-response to sanction applications does not amount to deemed sanction.
Sammaan Finserv Limited v. Svamaan Financial Services Private Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of two commercial appeals following amicable settlement between the parties and disposed of the matters accordingly.
Mohd. Rashid & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a voluntary settlement between the parties, emphasizing the Court's power to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.
Rajesh Ranjan v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the constitutional validity of Section 20 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, holding that the petitioner failed to establish any substantial legal ground to invalidate the statute.
Vinod Garg v. Kamlesh Mehta
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the rejection of the plaintiff's application for restoration of a commercial suit dismissed for non-prosecution due to inordinate delay and lack of sufficient cause.
Arun Kumar v. Priya Upadhyay Alias Khushi
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court’s maintenance award of Rs. 30,000 per month to the wife and child, rejecting allegations of income concealment and refusing to modify the maintenance amount.
Anil Kumar v. Anju
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's order directing legal heirs to pay alimony with interest from the deceased husband's estate, dismissing the appeal challenging interest liability beyond death.
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax - Central -1 v. Amol Awasthi
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's ruling that reopening assessments under Section 153C must be within the block period reckoned from the AY relevant to the satisfaction note, invalidating reopening for AY 2011-12.
Raj Vardhan Patodia (HUF) v. Registrar of Trade Marks & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal holding that filing a photocopy of evidence affidavit within time followed by the original shortly after satisfies Rule 45 requirements, setting aside the Registry's order deeming the opposition abandoned.
Raj Vardhan Patodia (HUF) v. Registrar of Trade Marks & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that filing a photocopy of evidence within time followed by original upon request complies with Trade Marks Rules, setting aside the Registry’s order dismissing opposition as abandoned.
Raj Vardhan Patodia (HUF) v. Registrar of Trade Marks & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that filing a photocopy of evidence within the prescribed time followed by prompt filing of the original prevents opposition from being deemed abandoned under Rule 45(2) of the Trade Marks Rules, 2017.
Aar Pee Refrigeration and Airconditioning v. Central Public Works Department
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole Arbitrator under the arbitration clause of the contract to adjudicate disputes arising from a public works contract, allowing the petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Geetanjali Kalra & Ors. v. Gaurav Gulati
The High Court allowed the petitioners' application to set aside an ex-parte order under Order IX Rule 7 CPC, holding that sufficient cause was shown for non-appearance and permitting them to contest the suit.
Vikas Sidhu v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court quashed the prison authorities' refusal and directed transfer of a life-convict prisoner to a Semi Open Jail, emphasizing compliance with judicial orders and consideration of good conduct.
Manish @ Mahesh v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld framing of charges under Sections 363/34 IPC against the petitioner for kidnapping a minor, holding that sufficient prima facie material existed at the charge framing stage.
Manish @ Mahesh v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the framing of charges under Sections 363/34 IPC against the petitioner for kidnapping a minor, holding that sufficient prima facie material existed to proceed with trial.
Vida Engg Co v. NBCC (India) Limited & Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing NBCC to release the security deposit without requiring a No Objection Certificate and to consider the petitioner's claim for accrued interest, affirming judicial review over arbitrary State action in contractual disputes.
Shellz India Private Limited v. Starco Metaplast Pvt Ltd
The High Court granted conditional leave to defend in a commercial suit for recovery, holding that a triable issue regarding defective goods raised by the buyer warrants trial despite prior acceptance under the Sale of Goods Act.