Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Lt Col Bharat Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that petitions challenging adverse remarks and seeking promotion do not automatically merit priority hearing over other urgent cases involving Armed Forces personnel and dismissed the petitioner’s request for advancement of hearing.
Lalit Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that no separate finding is required on a charge that merely reiterates other charges and allowed condonation of delay but dismissed the review petition seeking such finding.
Chetan Vats @ Chetan & Ors. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and divorce between the parties.
Sheeba; Mohammed Salik v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the non-evaluation of candidates' answer sheets due to incorrect bubbling of roll numbers, emphasizing strict adherence to procedural requirements in selection exams.
Moazzam Ali & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and dissolution of marriage by Mubarat.
Vicky & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) through S.H.O. Jaitpur & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between estranged spouses, exercising inherent powers to promote reconciliation and prevent abuse of process.
Deepak Minda & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The High Court held that only the Public Prosecutor or the Court can move applications under Section 311 CrPC to recall witnesses, and a private complainant cannot independently do so without statutory permission, setting aside the trial court's order allowing such an application by the complainant.
Rajesh Kumar v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 354 IPC but commuted the sentence to the period already served considering mitigating factors and prolonged trial delay.
Som Nath v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under the Essential Commodities Act but reduced the sentence to the period already served considering mitigating circumstances and prolonged litigation.
Shekh Rafiq v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's bail application in a murder case, holding that a prima facie case exists and the petitioner's conduct and identification by witnesses weigh against bail despite trial delays.
Mohd. Abid v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence of two appellants for gang rape under Section 376D IPC, relying on consistent prosecutrix testimony corroborated by independent witness and medical-forensic evidence.
Sachin Dev Duggal v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Delhi High Court upheld the issuance of Non-Bailable Warrants against a foreign national suspect for non-cooperation in a money laundering investigation, emphasizing proper service of summons and the scope of Section 73 CrPC.
Ajay Kumar Goyal v. Sanjay Goyal
The Delhi High Court allowed an appeal to restrain parties from creating third-party interests in a disputed property pending suit for specific performance, emphasizing preservation of the subject matter despite allegations of forgery.
Union of India v. Deepak Mehra
The Delhi High Court upheld the Railway Claims Tribunal's award of compensation to a passenger injured in a train accident, applying the principle of strict liability under the Railways Act despite technical issues regarding the boarding station.
Nand Kishor and Anr v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial dispute on the ground of amicable settlement between parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.
Saurabh & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement, applying inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS to prevent abuse of court process.
Praveen Kumar & Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a noncompoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Section 498A IPC on the ground of amicable settlement between the parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.
SS 47150F Maj Sneha B Sapkal v. Union of India and Ors
The High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition and disposed of the case accordingly.
Kumar Singh and Sgt. Mritunjay v. 698117 Sgt Surender Singh Rohilla Retd
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of broad-banding relief in disability pension cases but limited its application prospectively from the Supreme Court's ruling date.
Ram Bhajan Yadav v. Delhi Transco Ltd & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that cancellation of provisional appointment on eligibility grounds without issuing notice violates natural justice and directed reconsideration of the appellant's eligibility based on subsequent clarificatory certificate.