Delhi High Court
28,294 judgments
National Insurance Co. Ltd v. Geeta & Ors.
The Delhi High Court partly modified compensation awards in motor accident claims and remanded the issue of Insurance Company's recovery rights against the vehicle owner for further adjudication.
National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Vijay Shanker Mishra
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident death claim by correctly including allowances in income, limiting future prospects to 40%, reducing personal expenses deduction to one-third due to multiple dependents, applying multiplier based on deceased's age, and awarding loss of consortium distinct from love and affection.
Om Prakash v. Devki Nandan Bajaj
The Delhi High Court allowed the landlord's revision petition, holding that bona fide requirement under the DRC Act includes legitimate family needs and the landlord's choice of premises, setting aside the eviction petition's earlier rejection.
Mahua Moitra v. Lokpal of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the Lokpal's sanction under Section 20(7)(a) to file a charge-sheet against a Member of Parliament, clarifying the limited, procedural nature of sanction at this stage and the scope of judicial review.
Nandar Ni Ni v. Commissioner of Customs (Airport and General) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition directing release of seized gold jewellery as genuine used personal effects subject to warehousing charges.
M/S DAVINDER CHICKEN CENTRE v. SALES TAX OFFICER/CLASS II STO, DGST & ANR.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order for lack of opportunity to be heard and remanded the matter pending the Supreme Court's decision on the validity of related GST notifications.
Ameer Ahmad v. The Commissioner of Custom & Ors.
The Delhi High Court ordered release of seized gold bars due to non-issuance of Show Cause Notice within statutory time, subject to payment of customs duty, relying on the Supreme Court's Jatin Ahuja ruling.
Ramdiya Verma v. Commissioner of Customs New Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner’s revision petition setting aside the Customs confiscation order of his gold kada due to lack of proper investigation and credible evidence of prior ownership, ordering its release.
Jangbir Singh v. Commissioner of Customs
The Delhi High Court directed implementation of the Customs appellate order allowing release of seized gold items on payment of redemption fines and upheld penalties imposed for non-declaration at customs.
Pawan Sharma v. The Commissioner of Customs
The Delhi High Court set aside the Customs Department's order confiscating a gold chain and imposing penalty on an iPhone, directing their release without duty or fine under Article 226.
Ranvir Sra v. Commissioner of Customs
The Delhi High Court held that a worn Rolex watch worn by an OCI card holder is a personal effect exempt from customs detention and ordered its release due to lack of procedural compliance.
Nand Kishor Sharma v. Commissioner of Customs
The Delhi High Court held that detention of goods without valid Show Cause Notice and personal hearing under Section 124 of the Customs Act is unlawful and directed release of the detained gold chain.
Mohammad Arif v. Commissioner of Customs
The Delhi High Court held that detention of goods without issuance of a Show Cause Notice within the statutory period under the Customs Act, 1962, is illegal and directed release of the seized gold kada.
Mohammad Khadim Khan v. The Commissioner of Custom & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that detention of goods without issuance of a Show Cause Notice within the statutory period under the Customs Act is impermissible and directed release of the detained gold item subject to payment of Customs duty.
Zubaida Aziz v. The Commissioner of Custom
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file a belated appeal against Customs confiscation of raw gold items, emphasizing the requirement of personal hearing and procedural fairness.
Kapil Kumar & Anr. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR involving non-compoundable offences arising from a commercial dispute on the basis of an amicable settlement, exercising inherent jurisdiction under Section 528 BNSS.
Deepak Kumar and Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR involving non-compoundable offences on the ground of amicable settlement between parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 of BNSS.
Shafiq v. The State (NCT of Delhi); Ali Hasan v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 411 IPC but commuted the one-year sentence to the period already served by the petitioners considering the long delay and mitigating factors.
Anil Varma and Ors. v. Roopa Khanna
The Delhi High Court dismissed the judgment debtor's application seeking stay of auction and setting aside of auction notice, holding the notice valid and the applicant guilty of abusing court process by stalling execution.
Priya Narayanan & Ors. v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed summons issued under Section 21 of the POCSO Act against school authorities, holding that delay in reporting without mala fide and prompt in-house inquiry do not attract punishment under the Act.