Delhi High Court
82,660 judgments
Sanjay Jain v. Manju Jain
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn upon the appellant's request during the hearing.
Manjit Singh v. Parvinderkaur
The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant to withdraw the appeal and directed the Family Court to expedite disposal of the pending divorce petition.
Davinder Pal v. Master Mohit
The Delhi High Court disposed of the maintenance appeal as infructuous following a fresh settlement between parties, directing payment of agreed amounts and cooperation in quashing related criminal proceedings.
Deepak v. State
The High Court dismissed the criminal revision petition as withdrawn, granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh application after verifying his involvement in other cases.
Royal Orchid Hotels Limited v. Vardhman Estates Developers Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes between parties and allowed interim reliefs before the arbitrator.
Commissioner of Income Tax v. Bhushan Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the entitlement to deductions under Sections 80HH and 80I and held that expenditure on master plates is revenue expenditure, remanding the matter for further examination of expenses.
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX v. GULSHAN KUMAR
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revenue's appeals against ITAT orders granting deductions under Sections 80HH and 80I, following a prior ITAT decision on identical issues.
Mata Vaishno Finsec (P) Ltd v. Ravinder Singh Malik
The Delhi High Court condoned delay in filing a leave petition against dismissal of a Section 138 NI Act complaint for non-appearance, emphasizing merits over technicalities and setting aside the dismissal order.
Solan Foodproducts Ltd v. Breweries Engineering Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner one final opportunity to cross-examine the defence witness despite prior closure of evidence, subject to payment of costs.
Hira Prasad Mishra & Ors v. The State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from a commercial dispute following an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C., while imposing costs on the petitioners.
Anita Jain & Ors v. Arti Jain
The High Court allowed the petitioners to withdraw their criminal petition and dismissed it as withdrawn upon no objection from the respondent.
Nisar Ahmed & Anr v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 324, 326, and 34 IPC based on a voluntary settlement between parties, imposing a condition of blood donation by the petitioner.
Sunil Kumar v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and reconciliation between the married parties.
Adarsh Sharma v. Ruchi Sharma
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the impugned order for lack of infirmity but granted liberty to raise all pleas in appropriate proceedings.
Sharad Walia & Ors v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, 506, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties.
Sayyad Asim Akhtar & Anr v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 506, 509, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and withdrawal of complaint by the complainant.
Nabi Alam & Ors v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and pronouncement of Talaq between the parties, exercising its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Daya Shankar Jha v. Rebacca Luca
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Section 138 NI Act based on a bona fide settlement between parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Himanshu Aggarwal & Ors v. The State (Govt of NCT Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 406, 498-A, and 34 IPC in a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Amit Gaba v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual divorce between the parties, holding that continuing criminal proceedings would serve no useful purpose.