Delhi High Court
82,660 judgments
Mohd Yusuf & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC on the basis of amicable settlement between parties, reaffirming the scope of Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process in such cases.
Commissioner of Income Tax-(Central)-I v. Navin Khanna
This judgment records the hearing and decision dates for multiple connected income tax appeals before the Delhi High Court in 2015 without providing substantive details.
Commissioner of Income Tax-(Central)-I v. Navin Khanna
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Commissioner of Income Tax's appeals, affirming that tax assessments must be based on clear evidence and upholding the Tribunal's orders in favor of the respondents.
Commissioner of Income Tax-(Central)-I v. Navin Khanna
The Delhi High Court heard multiple connected Income Tax Appeals involving the Commissioner of Income Tax and various respondents, with the detailed judgment referenced in ITA 180/2015.
Commissioner of Income Tax-(Central)-I v. Navin Khanna
The Delhi High Court emphasized strict compliance with procedural and substantive requirements in Income Tax assessments, referring connected appeals to a detailed ruling in ITA 180/2015 for consistent adjudication.
Commissioner of Income Tax-(Central)-I v. Navin Khanna
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Commissioner of Income Tax's appeals, upholding the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's orders granting relief to the respondents in income tax assessment disputes.
Commissioner of Income Tax-(Central)-I v. Navin Khanna
This judgment concerns multiple Income Tax Appeals filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax against various respondents, heard by the Delhi High Court on April 15, 2015, with detailed reasoning referenced in a related case ITA 180/2015.
Commissioner of Income Tax-(Central)-I v. Navin Khanna
The Delhi High Court disposed of connected Income Tax Appeals filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax against multiple respondents, emphasizing lawful and evidence-based tax assessments under the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Radhey Shyam and Ors. v. Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking compensation for children drowned in open drains, holding the government was not negligent as adequate safety measures existed and the children were trespassers.
Union of India (Ministry of Railways) v. M/S J. Sons Engineering Corporation Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award declaring the contract termination illegal and allowed the respondent's claims, holding that the claims were arbitrable and the petitioners' counterclaims unsustainable.
Ramji Dass Arora v. Sunita Sharma
The Delhi High Court decreed recovery of an admitted advance payment for sale of property, holding that oral evidence cannot contradict a written agreement and the defendant cannot appropriate the advance to repay bank debts under SARFAESI Act.
Union of India v. N. Mohammad
The Delhi High Court upheld the setting aside of a compulsory retirement penalty for failure to supply UPSC advice to the delinquent officer before imposing punishment, reaffirming the Supreme Court's ruling in Union of India v. R.P. Singh (2014) 7 SCC 340.
Union of India v. Gopal Dutt Pandey
The Delhi High Court upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal's finding that failure to notify railway employees of revised pay rules deprived them of exercising their option, dismissing the Union of India's petition.
Rakesh Kumar and Company v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that limited judicial interference is permissible under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, and upheld the arbitral award on disputed contract claims for lack of manifest error or non-application of mind.
Commissioner of Income Tax-(Central)-I v. Arvind Khanna
The Delhi High Court held that assessees must independently prove the creditworthiness of the donor under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act beyond notarized statements and remanded the matter for further examination.
Gammon India Limited v. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of the petitioner's tender bid as technically non-responsive after expert evaluation, emphasizing limited judicial review over commercial contract awards absent arbitrariness or mala fides.
HCL Technologies v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
The Delhi High Court held that while an assessee is not estopped from claiming statutory deductions under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act despite prior non-claim, the appellant failed to prove that 31 software units were separate undertakings, and thus the enhanced deduction claim was rightly disallowed.
Rajpal v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of a public servant for accepting bribe, holding that valid sanction was granted, the prosecution proved demand and acceptance beyond doubt, and procedural irregularities did not vitiate the trial.
Satish Kumar Singh v. State Bank of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal of a contract employee denied permanent absorption by SBI, holding that regularization requires proper selection and performance-based evaluation, distinguishing the Uma Devi precedent.
Ravi Kumar v. Brij Behari Handa
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of a tenant on the landlord's bona fide requirement to open a medical shop, clarifying that size restrictions for chemist shops do not apply to allied medical shops.