Delhi High Court
81,561 judgments
Vikas Dagar v. State Through Public Prosecutor; Rao Satvir Singh v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners named in a mob violence FIR involving murder charges, emphasizing lack of specific allegations and imposing stringent conditions.
Ganga Misra v. Nagalakshmi & Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed the civil suit for default and non-prosecution due to the plaintiff's failure to appear and comply with court orders.
Narayan Kumar v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court refused to quash an FIR under Section 420 IPC arising from a property dispute, allowing investigation to proceed while granting interim protection from arrest to the petitioner.
Sant Nirankari Charitable Foundation v. Satwant Kaur & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the appeal and writ petition as infructuous after the respondent's voluntary retirement and settlement extinguished the dispute over her transfer.
Satish Kumar Singh v. Union Public Service Commission and Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to appear for the Assistant Legal Adviser interview despite age ineligibility caused by withdrawal and re-advertisement of the recruitment, treating the re-advertisement as a continuation of the original process.
Om Prakash v. New Delhi Municipal Council & Anr
The Delhi High Court disposed of multiple writ petitions against NDMC by referring to an earlier order in a connected petition, without imposing costs on the petitioners.
Commissioner of Income Tax-III v. SMCC Construction India Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's ruling that payments for technical knowhow under a license agreement are revenue expenditure and dismissed the Revenue's appeal challenging depreciation claims due to lack of factual determination.
Ashima Singh v. Sundesh Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld and enforced a voluntary settlement in a matrimonial dispute, disposing of all pending proceedings in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the parties.
Vikas Dagar v. State Through Public Prosecutor; Rao Satvir Singh v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners named in a murder FIR based on lack of specific allegations and their non-arrest at the spot, imposing stringent conditions to safeguard investigation.
Zakir Hussain v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes upon amicable settlement between the parties, affirming the High Court's inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to do so in such cases.
Devender @ Titu v. State & Ors.
The High Court of Delhi dismissed the criminal appeal of Devender @ Titu by referring to a detailed common judgment in a related case.
Suresh v. State
The appeal in Criminal Appeal No. 835/2012 was disposed of by referring to a common judgment delivered in another related appeal on the same day.
Naresh v. State
The Delhi High Court disposed of the criminal appeal by referring to a detailed common judgment in a related case without delivering a separate judgment.
Deepak v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions under Section 307/34 IPC based on credible injured witness testimony despite investigative lapses, modifying one appellant's sentence for lesser role.
M/S CAPITAL METERS LIMITED v. M/S S. JOHNFLEX INDUSTRIES
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal seeking to admit old documents at a late stage without plausible explanation, affirming that parties must produce documents timely to prevent abuse of process.
M/S NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUHTORITY OF INDIA v. M/S KNR-PATEL (JV)
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award in a contract dispute involving NHAI, ruling that courts cannot re-appreciate evidence under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act and dismissing the appeal challenging the award.
M/S EXCELLENT INVESTMENT SOLUTION v. STATE
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 420 IPC based on a settlement between parties, affirming the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to quash criminal proceedings in predominantly civil-commercial disputes to secure ends of justice.
Tirlok Chand & Anr. v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed FIR and proceedings under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act based on a genuine compromise between parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process.
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Sanjay Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's finding of 67% functional disability but enhanced future prospects to 50%, increasing compensation in a motor accident claim while dismissing the insurer's appeal.
Mahinder Singh v. Murti Devi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal upholding the dismissal of a suit for injunction as barred by limitation and res judicata, emphasizing that a suit for specific performance is the proper remedy for title disputes based on documents like agreement to sell.