Delhi High Court
81,413 judgments
Munish Sharma & Ors. v. Lalit Sharma & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld an interim injunction restraining transfer of property pending trial on the validity of a Will challenged for undue influence, while dismissing the challenge to a relinquishment deed due to absence of HUF status.
Punjab National Bank & Anr. v. H N Wadhwa
The Delhi High Court upheld the entitlement of an employee to suspension allowance from the date of dismissal set aside by the court until final penalty determination under Bank Regulations.
Kartar Singh v. D.D.A.
The Delhi High Court held that the final dismissal of a writ petition challenging termination bars reopening the issue before the CAT or High Court, and the CAT rightly dismissed the petitioner's claim for reinstatement and discrimination.
Narayan Kumar v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court refused to quash an FIR under Section 420 IPC in a property dispute, emphasizing the plenary power of police investigation and granting interim protection from arrest to the petitioner.
Narayan Kumar v. State & Anrs.
The Delhi High Court quashed a Section 145 CrPC notice for lack of Magistrate's recorded satisfaction about breach of peace, emphasizing the necessity of such satisfaction for valid initiation of proceedings.
Vikas Dagar v. State Through Public Prosecutor; Rao Satvir Singh v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners named in a mob violence FIR involving death, holding that absence of specific allegations and non-arrest at the spot justify bail subject to conditions.
Vinay & Ors. v. The State Govt of NCT Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 324, 341, 506, and 34 IPC based on amicable settlement between parties, applying the principles of Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Himanshu Malhotra & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 427, 452, and 34 IPC based on a mediated settlement, applying the principles governing compromise and inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Vicky Arya v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute based on an amicable mediated settlement, applying the principles of inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Ravinder Bansal & Ors. v. State (Through NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC based on a genuine mediated settlement, applying the principles of Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of court process.
Brij Pal Sharma & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute upon amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Hira Lal & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act on the ground of amicable settlement, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Gaurav Singh & Ors. v. State of (NCT) Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC based on an amicable settlement, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to secure ends of justice.
Saroj Arora & Ors. v. Mohinder Pal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a contempt petition for non-payment under a court order, holding that alternate civil remedies under the CPC must be exhausted before invoking contempt proceedings.
Naveen Gupta & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal proceeding under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes on the ground of amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Union of India v. Sunita Devi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's appeal, upholding the Railway Claims Tribunal's award of compensation for death due to accidental fall from train to a bonafide passenger traveling on a valid railway warrant.
INDOSOLAR LTD v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
The Delhi High Court held that investments made in the base financial year are excluded from discounting in calculating Net Present Value for subsidy eligibility under the Special Incentive Package Scheme, directing recalculation and grant of subsidy to the petitioner.
S.C. Ahuja v. N.D.M.C.
The Delhi High Court upheld that NDMC was justified in denying promotion to the appellant lacking a B.Ed degree as per existing Recruitment Rules, affirming employer discretion in qualification equivalence and validity of appointment of a qualified candidate.
BPTP Limited v. CPI India I Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld the Arbitral Tribunal's interim order directing BPTP to deposit Rs.251.20 crores from sale of real estate projects into escrow, affirming the Tribunal's jurisdiction and rejecting the claim that the order amounted to impermissible specific performance.
BPTP Limited v. CPI India I Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld the Arbitral Tribunal's interim order directing BPTP to deposit disputed sale proceeds into escrow, affirming the tribunal's jurisdiction to grant such interim measures consistent with prior court orders and contractual obligations.