Delhi High Court
81,561 judgments
Anita Devi v. Indian Oil Corporation
The Delhi High Court set aside IOCL's orders de-empaneling Anita Devi for alleged false experience certificate due to violation of natural justice and directed fresh consideration of eligibility and selection including scrutiny of Anju Kumari's qualifications and experience.
Shree Nath Heritage Liquor Pvt. Ltd. v. M/s. Allied Blender & Distillers Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed appeals challenging injunctions restraining use of marks "Collector's Choice" and "Officer's Special" as deceptively similar to the registered trademark "Officer's Choice", emphasizing semantic similarity and likelihood of consumer confusion.
Shree Nath Heritage Liquor Pvt. Ltd. v. M/s. Allied Blender & Distillers Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld interim injunctions restraining use of marks "Collector's Choice" and "Officer's Special" as deceptively similar to the registered trademark "Officer's Choice", emphasizing semantic similarity and consumer confusion.
Paminder Gujral v. Kirnajit Gujral
The Delhi High Court held that orders dismissing transfer petitions under Section 24 of the CPC are interlocutory discretionary orders and not judgments, hence no appeal lies against them under Section 10 of the Delhi High Court Act.
Paminder Gujral & Ors. v. Kirnajit Gujral & Anr.
An order dismissing a transfer petition under Section 24 of the CPC is interlocutory and not appealable under Section 10 of the Delhi High Court Act as it does not qualify as a judgment.
Pappu Ramasare Chourasiya & Ors v. M/S Religare Finvest Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the dismissal of Section 34 objections, holding that proper service of notices and intentional avoidance by appellants validated the ex parte arbitral award.
NTPC v. Hindustan Construction Company Limited
The Delhi High Court held that a qualified statement in a Section 34 petition does not amount to an unequivocal admission of liability restricting the challenge to an arbitral award.
Tarun Chawla & Ors. v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 288, 337, 304, 304-A, and 34 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement, applying the principles governing quashing under Section 482 CrPC while ensuring the offences were not serious enough to preclude such relief.
Mohit Yadav v. State of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 308 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between parties, applying the principles governing the exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Krishan Kant Gupta & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a mediated settlement in a matrimonial dispute, emphasizing the sparing exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.
Prempal Singh Mathur & Ors. v. State (NCT Delhi) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed petitions to quash cross FIRs under IPC and SC/ST Act on the ground of amicable settlement between neighbors, applying principles of Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Prempal Singh Mathur & Ors. v. State (NCT Delhi) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed two cross FIRs under IPC and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act on the ground of amicable settlement between neighbors, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd. v. Tattva Realtors Private Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner's ex parte appointment of a receiver under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to repossess a vehicle securing a defaulted loan, subject to safeguards and arbitration proceedings.
Rajinder Kumar Aggarwal v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that mere deposit of compensation in court does not amount to payment under the 2013 Land Acquisition Act, and acquisition proceedings without possession or payment lapse after five years, with the 2015 Amendment Ordinance applying prospectively.
Riaz Munir Ahmad v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a criminal conviction permits removal from service despite the benefit of probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, dismissing the petition challenging the removal of a university professor.
Samir Chawla v. Sandeep Kapur
The Delhi High Court accepted a court annexed mediation settlement in a summary suit, allowed refund of court fees under Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, and disposed of the suit accordingly.
Bank of Baroda v. AVM Health Care Products Pvt. Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellate tribunal's order remanding the impleadment application for reconsideration, affirming that while the plaintiff is dominus litis, courts can implead necessary parties following due process under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC.
Avinash Tripathi v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the denial of promotion to Assistant Executive Engineers who did not meet the prescribed 'Good' ACR grading benchmark, affirming uniform application of DoPT guidelines and rejecting claims based on administrative deviations.
Paminder Gujral & Ors. v. Kirnajit Gujral & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that an order dismissing a transfer petition under Section 24 CPC is not a judgment and hence not appealable under Section 10(1) of the Delhi High Court Act.
NTPC v. Hindustan Construction Company Limited
The Delhi High Court held that a qualified statement in a Section 34 petition does not amount to an unequivocal admission of liability, allowing the appellant to challenge all claims in the arbitral award.