Delhi High Court
80,117 judgments
M/S CAPITAL METERS LIMITED v. M/S S. JOHNFLEX INDUSTRIES
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal seeking to admit old documents at a late stage without plausible explanation, affirming that parties must produce documents timely to prevent abuse of process.
M/S NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUHTORITY OF INDIA v. M/S KNR-PATEL (JV)
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award in a contract dispute involving NHAI, ruling that courts cannot re-appreciate evidence under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act and dismissing the appeal challenging the award.
M/S EXCELLENT INVESTMENT SOLUTION v. STATE
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 420 IPC based on a settlement between parties, affirming the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to quash criminal proceedings in predominantly civil-commercial disputes to secure ends of justice.
Tirlok Chand & Anr. v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed FIR and proceedings under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act based on a genuine compromise between parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process.
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Sanjay Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's finding of 67% functional disability but enhanced future prospects to 50%, increasing compensation in a motor accident claim while dismissing the insurer's appeal.
Mahinder Singh v. Murti Devi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal upholding the dismissal of a suit for injunction as barred by limitation and res judicata, emphasizing that a suit for specific performance is the proper remedy for title disputes based on documents like agreement to sell.
Shakil Ahmad Varshney v. Dr. Alok Varshney & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the application for condonation of 116 days delay in filing an appeal against a motor accident claim award, holding that the appellant failed to show sufficient cause and bona fide prosecution, thereby dismissing the time-barred appeal.
Munish Sharma & Ors. v. Lalit Sharma & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld an interim injunction restraining transfer of property pending trial on the validity of a Will challenged for undue influence, while dismissing the challenge to a relinquishment deed due to absence of HUF status.
Punjab National Bank & Anr. v. H N Wadhwa
The Delhi High Court upheld the entitlement of an employee to suspension allowance from the date of dismissal set aside by the court until final penalty determination under Bank Regulations.
Kartar Singh v. D.D.A.
The Delhi High Court held that the final dismissal of a writ petition challenging termination bars reopening the issue before the CAT or High Court, and the CAT rightly dismissed the petitioner's claim for reinstatement and discrimination.
Narayan Kumar v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court refused to quash an FIR under Section 420 IPC in a property dispute, emphasizing the plenary power of police investigation and granting interim protection from arrest to the petitioner.
Narayan Kumar v. State & Anrs.
The Delhi High Court quashed a Section 145 CrPC notice for lack of Magistrate's recorded satisfaction about breach of peace, emphasizing the necessity of such satisfaction for valid initiation of proceedings.
Vikas Dagar v. State Through Public Prosecutor; Rao Satvir Singh v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners named in a mob violence FIR involving death, holding that absence of specific allegations and non-arrest at the spot justify bail subject to conditions.
Vinay & Ors. v. The State Govt of NCT Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 324, 341, 506, and 34 IPC based on amicable settlement between parties, applying the principles of Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Himanshu Malhotra & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 427, 452, and 34 IPC based on a mediated settlement, applying the principles governing compromise and inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Vicky Arya v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute based on an amicable mediated settlement, applying the principles of inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Ravinder Bansal & Ors. v. State (Through NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC based on a genuine mediated settlement, applying the principles of Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of court process.
Brij Pal Sharma & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute upon amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Hira Lal & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act on the ground of amicable settlement, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Gaurav Singh & Ors. v. State of (NCT) Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC based on an amicable settlement, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to secure ends of justice.